Suppr超能文献

成人身体素养评估:系统综述。

Physical literacy assessment in adults: A systematic review.

机构信息

Faculdade de Educação Física e Desporto, Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias, Lisboa, Portugal.

Programa Nacional de Promoção da Atividade Física, Direcção-Geral da Saúde, Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jul 14;18(7):e0288541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288541. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Physical literacy is a multidimensional construct that has been defined and interpreted in various ways, one of the most common being "the motivation, confidence, physical competence, knowledge and understanding to maintain physical activity throughout the life course". Although its improvement can positively affect many behavioral, psychological, social, and physical variables, debate remains over an appropriate method of collecting empirical physical literacy data. This systematic review sought to identify and critically evaluate all primary studies (published and unpublished, regardless of design or language) that assessed physical literacy in adults or have proposed measurement criteria. Relevant studies were identified by searching four databases (Pubmed, SportDiscus, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science), scanning reference lists of included articles, and manual cross-referencing of bibliographies cited in prior reviews. The final search was concluded on July 15, 2022. Thirty-one studies, published from 2016 to 2022, were analyzed. We found seven instruments measuring physical literacy in adults, of which six were questionnaires. The Perceived Physical Literacy Instrument was the first developed for adults and the most adopted. The included studies approached physical literacy definition in two ways: by pre-defining domains and assessing them discretely (through pre-validated or self-constructed instruments) and by defining domains as sub-scales after factorial analyses. We found a fair use of objective and subjective measures to assess different domains. The wide use of instruments developed for other purposes in combined assessments suggests the need for further instrument development and the potential oversimplification of the holistic concept, which may not result in a better understanding of physical literacy. Quality and usability characteristics of measurements were generally insufficiently reported. This lack of data makes it impossible to compare and make robust conclusions. We could not identify if any of the existing physical literacy assessments for adults is appropriate for large-scale/epidemiological studies.

摘要

身体素养是一个多维度的概念,其定义和解释方式多种多样,其中最常见的一种定义为“在整个生命历程中保持身体活动的动力、信心、身体能力、知识和理解”。尽管身体素养的提高可以积极影响许多行为、心理、社会和身体变量,但对于收集身体素养实证数据的适当方法仍存在争议。本系统评价旨在确定和批判性评估所有评估成年人身体素养的原始研究(无论设计或语言如何,无论是否发表),或提出测量标准的研究。通过在四个数据库(PubMed、SportDiscus、APA PsycINFO、Web of Science)中进行搜索、分析纳入文章的参考文献列表以及手动交叉引用之前综述中引用的参考文献来确定相关研究。最后一次搜索于 2022 年 7 月 15 日结束。分析了 2016 年至 2022 年发表的 31 项研究。我们发现有 7 种用于评估成年人身体素养的工具,其中 6 种是问卷。感知身体素养工具是第一个为成年人开发的工具,也是应用最广泛的工具。纳入的研究从两种方式接近身体素养的定义:通过预先定义领域并对其进行离散评估(通过预先验证或自行构建的工具)和通过在因子分析后将领域定义为子量表。我们发现,使用客观和主观测量来评估不同领域的方法较为合理。将为其他目的开发的工具在综合评估中广泛使用表明需要进一步开发工具,以及可能对整体概念的过度简化,这可能不会导致对身体素养的更好理解。测量的质量和可用性特征通常未得到充分报告。缺乏这些数据使得无法进行比较和得出稳健的结论。我们无法确定成年人现有的身体素养评估工具中是否有任何一种适合大规模/流行病学研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d925/10348568/f586b063e7c6/pone.0288541.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验