Morgan Ethan, Dyar Christina, Feinstein Brian A, Rose Karen
College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Infectious Disease Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
J Homosex. 2024 Aug 23;71(10):2287-2299. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2023.2233656. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
Over the next two decades, the number of caregivers is expected to climb dramatically alongside a rise in older adults, particularly sexual and gender minority (SGM) older adults, yet little research has assessed differences between SGM and non-SGM care partners. Data for these analyses come from the Columbus Healthy Aging Project ( = 79). This study was designed to assess several domains of health among adults aged ≥50 years in Columbus, Ohio, US. Multivariable regression models were used to examine the likelihood of being a care partner, the SGM identity of the primary care recipient, and caregiver strain. In our sample, 227 (28.6%) participants self-identified as care partners for at least one individual. Compared to heterosexuals, gay/lesbian (aOR = 8.38; 95% CI: 5.29, 13.29) participants were more likely to be care partners but did not experience elevated caregiver strain. Bisexual individuals (aIRR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.11, 2.61) reported greater caregiver strain, while those identifying as a different sexual identity reported lower caregiver strain (aIRR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.96). In turn, caregiver strain was reduced significantly when the care recipient identified as a member of the SGM community (aIRR = 0.67: 95% CI: 0.55, 0.80). These results suggest that SGM care partners may be at risk of unique stressors which may contribute to extant health disparities.
在接下来的二十年里,随着老年人数量的增加,尤其是性取向和性别少数群体(SGM)老年人数量的增加,预计护理人员的数量将急剧攀升。然而,很少有研究评估SGM护理伙伴与非SGM护理伙伴之间的差异。这些分析的数据来自哥伦布健康老龄化项目(n = 79)。本研究旨在评估美国俄亥俄州哥伦布市50岁及以上成年人的几个健康领域。使用多变量回归模型来检验成为护理伙伴的可能性、主要护理对象的SGM身份以及护理人员的压力。在我们的样本中,227名(28.6%)参与者自我认定为至少一个人的护理伙伴。与异性恋者相比,男同性恋/女同性恋者(调整后的比值比 = 8.38;95%置信区间:5.29,13.29)成为护理伙伴的可能性更大,但并未经历更高的护理人员压力。双性恋者(调整后的发病率比值比 = 1.70,95%置信区间:1.11,2.61)报告的护理人员压力更大,而那些认定为不同性取向身份的人报告的护理人员压力较低(调整后的发病率比值比 = 0.46,95%置信区间:0.23,0.96)。反过来,当护理对象被认定为SGM社区成员时,护理人员的压力会显著降低(调整后的发病率比值比 = 0.67:95%置信区间:0.55,0.80)。这些结果表明,SGM护理伙伴可能面临独特的压力源风险,这可能导致现存的健康差距。