• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患者临终关怀态度量表波斯语版的翻译及心理计量学验证。

Translation and psychometric validation of the Persian version of palliative care attitudes scale in cancer patients.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, School of Medical Sciences, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Jul 17;22(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01223-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12904-023-01223-3
PMID:37460923
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10351104/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To improve cancer patients' quality of life, palliative care is necessary. The growth of palliative care, along with the assistance of the government and the collaboration of specialists, also relies on the knowledge and attitude of people. In Iran, there is no tool available to gauge patient attitudes about palliative treatment. The Persian version of the Palliative Care Attitude Scale (PCAS-9) was translated and psychometrically validated in this research among cancer patients.

METHODS

This methodological study was conducted in two stages: translation stage and psychometric validation stage. The method of translation was based on that proposed by Polit and Yang. Utilizing a qualitative approach, the scale's face and content validity were investigated. 162 cancer patients who required palliative care based on expert diagnosis participated in the confirmatory factor analysis to establish construct validity. Stability and internal consistency provided evidence of reliability. The data was examined using SPSS18 and AMOS.

RESULTS

The "Palliative Care Attitudes Scale" translated well across cultures. Validity on both the face and the content was acceptable. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed a good fit for the original three-factor structure. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was equal to 0.89, while the internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) reliability of the whole scale was equal to 0.77.

CONCLUSIONS

Persian version of the "Palliative Care Attitudes Scale" was acceptable and adequate in cancer patients. Using this tool makes it easier to assess how patients feel about receiving palliative care and how well training sessions are working to change patients' views.

摘要

简介

为了提高癌症患者的生活质量,姑息治疗是必要的。姑息治疗的发展,以及政府的援助和专家的合作,也依赖于人们的知识和态度。在伊朗,没有衡量患者对姑息治疗态度的工具。本研究在癌症患者中翻译并心理计量学验证了姑息治疗态度量表(PCAS-9)的波斯语版本。

方法

本方法学研究分为两个阶段进行:翻译阶段和心理计量学验证阶段。翻译方法基于 Polit 和 Yang 提出的方法。利用定性方法,研究了量表的表面和内容效度。根据专家诊断,162 名需要姑息治疗的癌症患者参与了验证性因子分析,以建立结构效度。稳定性和内部一致性提供了可靠性的证据。数据使用 SPSS18 和 AMOS 进行检验。

结果

“姑息治疗态度量表”在跨文化背景下翻译良好。表面和内容效度都可以接受。验证性因子分析(CFA)显示,原始的三因素结构拟合良好。组内相关系数(ICC)等于 0.89,而整个量表的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha)信度等于 0.77。

结论

癌症患者的“姑息治疗态度量表”的波斯语版本是可以接受的,也是足够的。使用这个工具可以更容易地评估患者对接受姑息治疗的感受,以及培训课程在改变患者观点方面的效果如何。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cb7/10351104/a8af0d4b6b68/12904_2023_1223_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cb7/10351104/a8af0d4b6b68/12904_2023_1223_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cb7/10351104/a8af0d4b6b68/12904_2023_1223_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Translation and psychometric validation of the Persian version of palliative care attitudes scale in cancer patients.癌症患者临终关怀态度量表波斯语版的翻译及心理计量学验证。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Jul 17;22(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01223-3.
2
Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of "good death inventory- short Form" from the perspective of family-members of cancer patients.从癌症患者家属的角度出发,翻译并心理计量评估“良好死亡清单-短式”的波斯语版本。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Sep 2;11(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01305-0.
3
Psychometric Properties of the 'Patients' Perspective of the Quality of Palliative Care Scale'.“患者对姑息治疗质量的看法量表”的心理测量特性
Indian J Palliat Care. 2022 Jan-Mar;28(1):64-74. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_72_2021. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
4
Italian Version of Cancer Dyspnea Scale: Cultural-Linguistic and Clinical Validation in Patients With Advanced Cancer Disease in Palliative Care Settings.癌症呼吸困难量表的意大利语版本:在姑息治疗环境中晚期癌症患者中的文化语言和临床验证。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Mar;61(3):571-578.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
5
Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the UCLA Geriatrics Attitudes Scale (UCLA-GAS).《UCLA 老年医学态度量表(UCLA-GAS)波斯语版的心理测量特性》。
Curr Aging Sci. 2022 Aug 4;15(3):259-265. doi: 10.2174/1874609815666220419104512.
6
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the attitude scale for home care: a study of reliability and validity.波斯语版家庭护理态度量表的心理测量学特性:信度和效度研究。
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2022 Jan-Mar;41(1):76-90. doi: 10.1080/01621424.2021.1972891. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
7
Translation and psychometric evaluation of the persian version of the "Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale".《护理专业自我效能量表》波斯语版本的翻译及心理测量学评估
BMC Nurs. 2023 Jan 25;22(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01182-3.
8
Translation and psychometric evaluation of the reflective capacity scale in Iranian medical education.伊朗医学教育中反思能力量表的翻译与心理计量学评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Oct 27;23(1):809. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04791-3.
9
Psychometrics of the Persian version of the program in palliative care education and practice questionnaire (German revised - PPCEP-GR).姑息治疗教育与实践问卷(德国修订版 - PPCEP-GR)波斯文版的心理测量学。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Jun 23;22(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01196-3.
10
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE).老年人体力活动量表(PASE)波斯文版的心理测量特性。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jun 23;21(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02337-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer in Iran 2008 to 2025: Recent incidence trends and short-term predictions of the future burden.伊朗癌症发病情况 2008 年至 2025 年:近期发病趋势和未来负担的短期预测。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Aug 1;149(3):594-605. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33574. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
2
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3
Models of Palliative Care Delivery for Patients With Cancer.
癌症患者姑息治疗的提供模式。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar 20;38(9):852-865. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02123. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
4
Palliative care referral in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock in the United States.美国 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者的姑息治疗转介。
Heart Lung. 2020 Jan-Feb;49(1):25-29. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
5
Development and Validation of the Palliative Care Attitudes Scale (PCAS-9): A Measure of Patient Attitudes Toward Palliative Care.《舒缓医疗态度量表(PCAS-9)的编制与验证:患者对舒缓医疗态度的测量工具》
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Feb;59(2):293-301.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.09.008. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
6
Utilization of Palliative Care for Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: A 15-Year National Perspective on Trends, Disparities, Predictors, and Outcomes.姑息治疗在急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克中的应用:基于全国15年的趋势、差异、预测因素及结局分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Aug 6;8(15):e011954. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.011954. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
7
Utilization of palliative care in patients hospitalized with heart failure: A contemporary national perspective.心力衰竭住院患者姑息治疗的应用:当代全国视角。
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Jan;42(1):136-142. doi: 10.1002/clc.23119. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
8
Development and Initial Psychometric Properties of a Questionnaire to Assess Competence in Palliative Care: Palliative Care Competence Framework Questionnaire.一份用于评估姑息治疗能力的问卷的编制及初步心理测量学特性:姑息治疗能力框架问卷
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Oct;35(10):1304-1308. doi: 10.1177/1049909118772565. Epub 2018 May 6.
9
Communication about palliative care: A phenomenological study exploring patient views and responses to its discussion.关于姑息治疗的沟通:一项探索患者对其讨论的看法和反应的现象学研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;32(1):133-142. doi: 10.1177/0269216317735247. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
10
Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity.工具评估中的信度和效度的心理测量特性。
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017 Jul-Sep;26(3):649-659. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022.