Suppr超能文献

高压脉冲射频治疗原发性三叉神经痛的有效性和安全性:一项多中心、随机、双盲、对照研究。

Effectiveness and safety of high-voltage pulsed radiofrequency to treat patients with primary trigeminal neuralgia: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Headache Pain. 2023 Jul 18;24(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s10194-023-01629-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a debilitating pain disorder that still lacks an ideal treatment option. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF), especially with high output voltage, is a novel and minimally invasive technique. PRF is regarded a promising treatment option for TN patients who respond poorly to medical treatment; however, the available evidence still lacks high quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Our study aimed to evaluate the long-term (1 year and 2 years) effects and safety of high-voltage PRF in primary TN patients and provide stronger evidence for TN treatment options.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter, double-blind, RCT in adults (aged 18-75 years) with primary TN who responded poorly to drug therapy or were unable to tolerate the side effects of drug. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either high voltage PRF or nerve block with steroid and local anesthetic drugs. The primary endpoint was the 1-year response rate. This trial has been registered in the clinicaltrials.gov website (registration number: NCT03131466).

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-two patients were screened for enrollment between April 28th,2017 and September1st, 2019, among whom, 28 were excluded. One hundred and thirty-four participants were randomly assigned to either receive high voltage PRF (n = 67) or nerve block (n = 67). The proportion of patients with a positive response at 1-year after the procedure in the PRF group was significantly higher than that in the nerve block group in the intention-to-treat population (73.1% vs. 32.8%, p < 0.001). There was no difference between groups in the incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support that high voltage PRF could be a preferred interventional choice prior to receiving more invasive surgical treatment or neuro-destructive treatment for TN patients who have poor responses to medical treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Our study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (trial registration number: NCT03131466).

摘要

背景

三叉神经痛(TN)是一种使人虚弱的疼痛障碍,目前仍缺乏理想的治疗方法。脉冲射频(PRF),特别是高输出电压,是一种新的微创技术。PRF 被认为是对药物治疗反应不佳或无法耐受药物副作用的 TN 患者的一种有前途的治疗选择;然而,现有的证据仍然缺乏高质量的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们的研究旨在评估高电压 PRF 在原发性 TN 患者中的长期(1 年和 2 年)疗效和安全性,并为 TN 治疗方法提供更有力的证据。

方法

我们在对药物治疗反应不佳或无法耐受药物副作用的原发性 TN 成年患者(18-75 岁)中进行了一项多中心、双盲、RCT。符合条件的参与者被随机分配(1:1)接受高电压 PRF 或类固醇和局部麻醉药物的神经阻滞。主要终点是 1 年的反应率。该试验已在 clinicaltrials.gov 网站(注册号:NCT03131466)注册。

结果

2017 年 4 月 28 日至 2019 年 9 月 1 日期间,共筛选了 162 名患者入组,其中 28 名被排除。134 名参与者被随机分配接受高电压 PRF(n=67)或神经阻滞(n=67)。意向治疗人群中,PRF 组在治疗后 1 年时阳性反应的患者比例明显高于神经阻滞组(73.1%比 32.8%,p<0.001)。两组不良反应发生率无差异。

结论

我们的研究结果支持,对于对药物治疗反应不佳的 TN 患者,高电压 PRF 可能是一种首选的介入治疗选择,可在接受更具侵袭性的手术治疗或神经破坏性治疗之前使用。

试验注册

我们的研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(试验注册号:NCT03131466)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12f0/10353218/3a13e77bd2e8/10194_2023_1629_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验