• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小机器人,大影响:通过简单策略解决可选囚徒困境博弈中的合作难题。

Small bots, big impact: solving the conundrum of cooperation in optional Prisoner's Dilemma game through simple strategies.

机构信息

Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Engineering Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 816-8580, Japan.

School of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J R Soc Interface. 2023 Jul;20(204):20230301. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0301. Epub 2023 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1098/rsif.2023.0301
PMID:37464799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10354466/
Abstract

Cooperation plays a crucial role in both nature and human society, and the conundrum of cooperation attracts the attention from interdisciplinary research. In this study, we investigated the evolution of cooperation in optional Prisoner's Dilemma games by introducing simple bots. We focused on one-shot and anonymous games, where the bots could be programmed to always cooperate, always defect, never participate or choose each action with equal probability. Our results show that cooperative bots facilitate the emergence of cooperation among ordinary players in both well-mixed populations and a regular lattice under weak imitation scenarios. Introducing loner bots has no impact on the emergence of cooperation in well-mixed populations, but it facilitates the dominance of cooperation in regular lattices under strong imitation scenarios. However, too many loner bots on a regular lattice inhibit the spread of cooperation and can eventually result in a breakdown of cooperation. Our findings emphasize the significance of bot design in promoting cooperation and offer useful insights for encouraging cooperation in real-world scenarios.

摘要

合作在自然界和人类社会中都起着至关重要的作用,合作的难题引起了跨学科研究的关注。在这项研究中,我们通过引入简单的机器人,研究了可选囚徒困境游戏中合作的演变。我们专注于单次和匿名游戏,机器人可以被编程为始终合作、始终背叛、从不参与或均等概率选择每个动作。我们的结果表明,合作机器人在弱模仿情景下的均匀混合群体和规则晶格中促进了普通玩家之间合作的出现。引入孤独机器人对均匀混合群体中合作的出现没有影响,但在强模仿情景下,它促进了规则晶格中合作的主导地位。然而,规则晶格上过多的孤独机器人会抑制合作的传播,最终可能导致合作的崩溃。我们的研究结果强调了机器人设计在促进合作方面的重要性,并为鼓励现实场景中的合作提供了有用的见解。

相似文献

1
Small bots, big impact: solving the conundrum of cooperation in optional Prisoner's Dilemma game through simple strategies.小机器人,大影响:通过简单策略解决可选囚徒困境博弈中的合作难题。
J R Soc Interface. 2023 Jul;20(204):20230301. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0301. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
2
Cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game with probabilistic abstention.具有概率弃权的空间囚徒困境博弈中的合作。
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 28;8(1):14531. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32933-x.
3
Impact of social reward on the evolution of cooperation in voluntary prisoner's dilemma.社会奖励对自愿囚徒困境中合作演变的影响
Biosystems. 2023 Jan;223:104821. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2022.104821. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
4
Complex pathways to cooperation emergent from asymmetry in heterogeneous populations.从异质群体的不对称中涌现出合作的复杂途径。
Chaos. 2024 Feb 1;34(2). doi: 10.1063/5.0188177.
5
Sequential interactions-in which one player plays first and another responds-promote cooperation in evolutionary-dynamical simulations of single-shot Prisoner's Dilemma and Snowdrift games.在单次囚徒困境和雪堆博弈的进化动力学模拟中,顺序交互(一个玩家先玩,另一个玩家响应)促进了合作。
J Theor Biol. 2018 Sep 7;452:69-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 21.
6
The promoting effect of adaptive persistence aspiration on the cooperation based on the consideration of payoff and environment in prisoner's dilemma game.在囚徒困境博弈中,基于收益和环境考量,适应性持续抱负对合作的促进作用。
Biosystems. 2023 Apr;226:104868. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2023.104868. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
7
The consequences of switching strategies in a two-player iterated survival game.在两人重复生存博弈中转换策略的后果。
J Math Biol. 2021 Feb 6;82(3):17. doi: 10.1007/s00285-021-01569-3.
8
Emergence of super cooperation of prisoner's dilemma games on scale-free networks.无标度网络上囚徒困境博弈的超级合作现象
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 2;10(2):e0116429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116429. eCollection 2015.
9
Evolutionary escape from the prisoner's dilemma.从囚徒困境中实现进化逃逸。
J Theor Biol. 2007 Apr 7;245(3):411-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.10.011. Epub 2006 Oct 18.
10
Prosocial punishment bots breed social punishment in human players.亲社会惩罚机器人在人类玩家中培养社会惩罚行为。
J R Soc Interface. 2024 Mar;21(212):20240019. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0019. Epub 2024 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolution of trust in the -player trust game with transformation incentive mechanism.具有转化激励机制的-玩家信任博弈中信任的演变
J R Soc Interface. 2025 Mar;22(224):20240726. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0726. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
2
Cooperative bots exhibit nuanced effects on cooperation across strategic frameworks.合作型机器人在不同战略框架下对合作呈现出细微的影响。
J R Soc Interface. 2025 Jan;22(222):20240427. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0427. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
3
Investigating the impact of environmental feedback on the optional prisoner's dilemma for insights into cyclic dominance and evolution of cooperation.研究环境反馈对可选囚徒困境的影响,以洞察循环优势与合作的演变。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Oct 23;11(10):240717. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240717. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Emergence of cooperation in the one-shot Prisoner's dilemma through Discriminatory and Samaritan AIs.通过歧视性和利他性 AI,实现一次性囚徒困境中的合作。
J R Soc Interface. 2024 Sep;21(218):20240212. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0212. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
5
Enhancing social cohesion with cooperative bots in societies of greedy, mobile individuals.在由贪婪、流动的个体组成的社会中,利用合作机器人增强社会凝聚力。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jun 5;3(6):pgae223. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae223. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
The art of compensation: How hybrid teams solve collective-risk dilemmas.补偿的艺术:混合团队如何解决集体风险困境。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 9;19(2):e0297213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297213. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Delegation to artificial agents fosters prosocial behaviors in the collective risk dilemma.授权给人工智能代理有助于促进集体风险困境中的亲社会行为。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 19;12(1):8492. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11518-9.
2
Early exclusion leads to cyclical cooperation in repeated group interactions.早期排除导致重复群体互动中的周期性合作。
J R Soc Interface. 2022 Mar;19(188):20210755. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0755. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
3
Artificial intelligence development races in heterogeneous settings.人工智能在异构环境中竞相发展。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 2;12(1):1723. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05729-3.
4
Emotion expressions shape human social norms and reputations.情感表达塑造人类社会规范和声誉。
iScience. 2021 Feb 4;24(3):102141. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102141. eCollection 2021 Mar 19.
5
Interdisciplinary Case Study: Understanding the Cooperation of Humans and Robots through the Collaboration of Social and Computer Scientists.跨学科案例研究:通过社会科学家与计算机科学家的合作理解人与机器人的协作
iScience. 2020 Nov 3;23(12):101680. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101680. eCollection 2020 Dec 18.
6
Network Engineering Using Autonomous Agents Increases Cooperation in Human Groups.使用自主智能体的网络工程可增强人类群体中的合作。
iScience. 2020 Aug 6;23(9):101438. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101438.
7
The evolution of trust and trustworthiness.信任与诚信的演变。
J R Soc Interface. 2020 Aug;17(169):20200491. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0491. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
8
Experimental evidence for tipping points in social convention.社会规范转折点的实验证据。
Science. 2018 Jun 8;360(6393):1116-1119. doi: 10.1126/science.aas8827.
9
Locally noisy autonomous agents improve global human coordination in network experiments.在网络实验中,局部有噪声的自主主体可改善全球人类协调。
Nature. 2017 May 17;545(7654):370-374. doi: 10.1038/nature22332.
10
Multiagent cooperation and competition with deep reinforcement learning.基于深度强化学习的多智能体合作与竞争
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 5;12(4):e0172395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172395. eCollection 2017.