Zhang C, Maga A M
Center for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.
Division of Craniofacial Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.
Integr Org Biol. 2023 Jul 7;5(1):obad024. doi: 10.1093/iob/obad024. eCollection 2023.
Acquiring accurate 3D biological models efficiently and economically is important for morphological data collection and analysis in organismal biology. In recent years, structure-from-motion (SFM) photogrammetry has become increasingly popular in biological research due to its flexibility and being relatively low cost. SFM photogrammetry registers 2D images for reconstructing camera positions as the basis for 3D modeling and texturing. However, most studies of organismal biology still relied on commercial software to reconstruct the 3D model from photographs, which impeded the adoption of this workflow in our field due the blocking issues such as cost and affordability. Also, prior investigations in photogrammetry did not sufficiently assess the geometric accuracy of the models reconstructed. Consequently, this study has two goals. First, we presented an affordable and highly flexible SFM photogrammetry pipeline based on the open-source package OpenDroneMap (ODM) and its user interface WebODM. Second, we assessed the geometric accuracy of the photogrammetric models acquired from the ODM pipeline by comparing them to the models acquired via microCT scanning, the de facto method to image skeleton. Our sample comprised 15 (mountain beaver) skulls. Using models derived from microCT scans of the samples as reference, our results showed that the geometry of the models derived from ODM was sufficiently accurate for gross metric and morphometric analysis as the measurement errors are usually around or below 2%, and morphometric analysis captured consistent patterns of shape variations in both modalities. However, subtle but distinct differences between the photogrammetric and microCT-derived 3D models could affect the landmark placement, which in return affected the downstream shape analysis, especially when the variance within a sample is relatively small. At the minimum, we strongly advise not combining 3D models derived from these two modalities for geometric morphometric analysis. Our findings can be indictive of similar issues in other SFM photogrammetry tools since the underlying pipelines are similar. We recommend that users run a pilot test of geometric accuracy before using photogrammetric models for morphometric analysis. For the research community, we provide detailed guidance on using our pipeline for building 3D models from photographs.
高效且经济地获取精确的三维生物模型对于生物形态学数据的收集和分析至关重要。近年来,基于运动结构(SFM)的摄影测量法因其灵活性和相对较低的成本在生物学研究中越来越受欢迎。SFM摄影测量法通过配准二维图像来重建相机位置,以此作为三维建模和纹理映射的基础。然而,大多数生物形态学研究仍依赖商业软件从照片中重建三维模型,由于成本和可及性等阻碍问题,这妨碍了该工作流程在我们领域的应用。此外,先前摄影测量的研究并未充分评估所重建模型的几何精度。因此,本研究有两个目标。首先,我们基于开源软件包OpenDroneMap(ODM)及其用户界面WebODM,提出了一种经济实惠且高度灵活的SFM摄影测量流程。其次,我们通过将ODM流程获取的摄影测量模型与通过显微CT扫描(成像骨骼的实际方法)获取的模型进行比较来评估这些模型的几何精度。我们的样本包括15个(山地海狸)头骨。以样本的显微CT扫描所得模型作为参考,我们的结果表明,ODM所得模型的几何形状对于总体度量和形态测量分析而言足够精确,因为测量误差通常在2%左右或低于2%,并且形态测量分析在两种模式下均捕捉到了一致的形状变化模式。然而,摄影测量法和显微CT所得三维模型之间细微但明显的差异可能会影响地标点的放置,进而影响下游的形状分析,尤其是当样本内的方差相对较小时。至少,我们强烈建议不要将这两种模式所得的三维模型用于几何形态测量分析。由于底层流程相似,我们的研究结果可能预示着其他SFM摄影测量工具中存在类似问题。我们建议用户在将摄影测量模型用于形态测量分析之前进行几何精度的预测试。对于研究群体,我们提供了关于使用我们的流程从照片构建三维模型的详细指南。