• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

叶片结构特征介导高粱在未受侵害条件下对高粱蚜虫的先天物理抗性。

Leaf structural traits mediating pre-existing physical innate resistance to sorghum aphid in sorghum under uninfested conditions.

机构信息

Department of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA.

Cropping Systems Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Lubbock, TX, 79415, USA.

出版信息

Planta. 2023 Jul 20;258(2):46. doi: 10.1007/s00425-023-04194-0.

DOI:10.1007/s00425-023-04194-0
PMID:37468707
Abstract

We found four indicative traits of innate immunity. Sorghum-resistant varieties had a greater trichome, stomatal and chloroplast density, and smaller mesophyll intercellular width than susceptible varieties. The sorghum aphid (SA), Melanaphis sorghi (Theobald), can severely reduce sorghum yield. The contribution of structural traits to SA resistance has not been extensively studied. Moreover, the current screening method for resistance is inherently subjective for resistance and requires infestation in plants. Quantifying the microanatomical basis of innate SA resistance is crucial for developing reliable screening tools requiring no infestation. The goal of this study was to identify structural traits linked to physical innate SA resistance in sorghum. We conducted controlled environment and field experiments under no SA infestation conditions, with two resistant (R. LBK1 and R. Tx2783) and two susceptible (R. Tx7000 and R. Tx430) varieties. Leaf tissues collected at the fifth leaf stage in the controlled environment experiment were analyzed for the epidermal and mesophyll traits using light and transmission electron microscopy. Leaf tissues collected at physiological maturity in the field experiment were analyzed for surface traits using scanning electron microscopy. Our results showed that stomatal density, trichome density, trichome length, and chloroplast density are key leaf structural traits indicative of physical innate SA resistance. We found that resistant varieties had a greater density of trichomes (39%), stomata (31%), and chloroplast (42%), and smaller mesophyll intercellular width (- 52%) than susceptible varieties. However, the chloroplast, mitochondria, and epidermal cell ultrastructural traits were ineffective indicators of SA resistance. Our findings provide the foundation for developing an objective high-throughput method for SA resistance screening. We suggest a follow-up validation experiment to confirm our outcomes under SA infestation conditions.

摘要

我们发现了先天免疫的四个指示特征。与感病品种相比,高粱抗性品种的表皮毛、气孔和叶绿体密度更大,叶肉细胞间隙更小。高粱蚜虫(SA),麦二叉蚜(Melanaphis sorghi),可以严重降低高粱产量。结构特征对 SA 抗性的贡献尚未得到广泛研究。此外,目前的抗性筛选方法对于抗性来说具有内在的主观性,并且需要在植物上进行侵染。量化先天 SA 抗性的微观解剖基础对于开发不需要侵染的可靠筛选工具至关重要。本研究的目的是确定与高粱物理先天 SA 抗性相关的结构特征。我们在没有 SA 侵染的条件下进行了受控环境和田间实验,使用了两个抗性(R. LBK1 和 R. Tx2783)和两个感病(R. Tx7000 和 R. Tx430)品种。在受控环境实验中,从第五叶期采集叶片组织,使用光镜和透射电子显微镜分析表皮和叶肉特征。在田间实验中,从生理成熟时采集叶片组织,使用扫描电子显微镜分析表面特征。我们的结果表明,气孔密度、表皮毛密度、表皮毛长度和叶绿体密度是指示物理先天 SA 抗性的关键叶片结构特征。我们发现,抗性品种的表皮毛(39%)、气孔(31%)和叶绿体(42%)密度较大,叶肉细胞间隙较小(-52%),而感病品种则较小。然而,叶绿体、线粒体和表皮细胞超微结构特征不是 SA 抗性的有效指标。我们的发现为开发客观的高通量 SA 抗性筛选方法奠定了基础。我们建议进行后续验证实验,以确认我们在 SA 侵染条件下的结果。

相似文献

1
Leaf structural traits mediating pre-existing physical innate resistance to sorghum aphid in sorghum under uninfested conditions.叶片结构特征介导高粱在未受侵害条件下对高粱蚜虫的先天物理抗性。
Planta. 2023 Jul 20;258(2):46. doi: 10.1007/s00425-023-04194-0.
2
Combining transcriptome and metabolome analysis to understand the response of sorghum to Melanaphis sacchari.结合转录组和代谢组分析理解高粱对麦长管蚜的响应。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Jun 11;24(1):529. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05229-8.
3
Genome-wide association mapping of resistance to the sorghum aphid in Sorghum bicolor.全基因组关联分析鉴定高粱抗高粱蚜的位点。
Genomics. 2022 Jul;114(4):110408. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2022.110408. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
4
Detecting sorghum aphid infestation in grain sorghum using leaf spectral response.利用叶片光谱响应检测高粱上的高粱蚜虫侵害。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 18;14(1):14053. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64841-8.
5
Sugarcane Aphid Population Growth, Plant Injury, and Natural Enemies on Selected Grain Sorghum Hybrids in Texas and Louisiana.德克萨斯州和路易斯安那州部分高粱杂交品种上甘蔗蚜的种群增长、植株损伤及天敌情况
J Econ Entomol. 2017 Oct 1;110(5):2109-2118. doi: 10.1093/jee/tox204.
6
Elevated production of reactive oxygen species is related to host plant resistance to sugarcane aphid in sorghum.活性氧的产生增加与高粱对甘蔗蚜虫的寄主植物抗性有关。
Plant Signal Behav. 2021 Feb 1;16(2):1849523. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2020.1849523. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
7
Revealing Differential Expression of Phytohormones in Sorghum in Response to Aphid Attack Using the Metabolomics Approach.利用代谢组学方法揭示高粱对蚜虫攻击的激素差异表达。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 9;23(22):13782. doi: 10.3390/ijms232213782.
8
Differential responses of sorghum genotypes to sugarcane aphid feeding.高粱基因型对甘蔗蚜虫取食的差异反应。
Planta. 2020 Jul 3;252(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s00425-020-03419-w.
9
Global Responses of Resistant and Susceptible Sorghum () to Sugarcane Aphid ().抗性和敏感高粱对甘蔗蚜的全球响应
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Feb 22;10:145. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00145. eCollection 2019.
10
Systemic regulation of leaf anatomical structure, photosynthetic performance, and high-light tolerance in sorghum.高粱叶片解剖结构、光合性能和高光耐受性的系统调控。
Plant Physiol. 2011 Mar;155(3):1416-24. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.172213. Epub 2011 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Sorghum aphid/greenbug: current research and control strategies to accelerate the breeding of aphid-resistant sorghum.高粱蚜/麦二叉蚜:加速抗蚜高粱育种的当前研究与防治策略
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jun 3;16:1588702. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1588702. eCollection 2025.
2
Aphid Resistance Evaluation and Constitutive Resistance Analysis of Eighteen Lilies.十八种百合的蚜虫抗性评价及组成抗性分析
Insects. 2023 Dec 8;14(12):936. doi: 10.3390/insects14120936.

本文引用的文献

1
Common resistance mechanisms are deployed by plants against sap-feeding herbivorous insects: insights from a meta-analysis and systematic review.植物对吸食汁液的植食性昆虫通常会产生抗性机制:来自荟萃分析和系统评价的见解。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 25;12(1):17836. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20741-3.
2
Phloem: At the center of action in plant defense against aphids.韧皮部:在植物抵御蚜虫的防御反应的中心起作用。
J Plant Physiol. 2022 Jun;273:153695. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2022.153695. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
3
Aphid Resistance in Affects the Feeding Behavior of Pea-Adapted and Non-Pea-Adapted Biotypes of Differently.
抗蚜性对适应豌豆和不适应豌豆的不同生物型的取食行为有不同影响。
Insects. 2022 Mar 8;13(3):268. doi: 10.3390/insects13030268.
4
High-throughput imaging of fresh-frozen plant reproductive samples in a variable pressure SEM.在可变压力扫描电子显微镜中对新鲜冷冻植物生殖样本进行高通量成像。
MethodsX. 2021 May 18;8:101392. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101392. eCollection 2021.
5
Seed-to-seed early-season cold resiliency in sorghum.高粱种子间的早期抗寒能力
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 8;11(1):7801. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87450-1.
6
Location, location, location: Feeding site affects aphid performance by altering access and quality of nutrients.位置、位置、位置:取食点通过改变营养物质的可及性和质量来影响蚜虫的表现。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 4;16(2):e0245380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245380. eCollection 2021.
7
Glandular trichome-derived sesquiterpenes of wild tomato accessions (Solanum habrochaites) affect aphid performance and feeding behavior.腺毛衍生的倍半萜烯影响野生番茄品系(Solanum habrochaites)上蚜虫的表现和取食行为。
Phytochemistry. 2020 Dec;180:112532. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2020.112532. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
8
Characterisation of bird cherry-oat aphid ( L.) behaviour and aphid host preference in relation to partially resistant and susceptible wheat landraces.欧洲谷物蚜(鸟樱桃燕麦蚜)行为及蚜虫寄主偏好与部分抗性和感病小麦地方品种关系的特征分析
Ann Appl Biol. 2020 Sep;177(2):184-194. doi: 10.1111/aab.12616. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
9
Mutations in Two Aphid-Regulated -1,3-Glucanase Genes by CRISPR/Cas9 Do Not Increase Barley Resistance to L.通过CRISPR/Cas9技术对两个蚜虫调控的β-1,3-葡聚糖酶基因进行突变并不会增强大麦对叶锈菌的抗性
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jul 9;11:1043. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01043. eCollection 2020.
10
Plant Cell Walls: Impact on Nutrient Bioaccessibility and Digestibility.植物细胞壁:对营养物质生物可及性和消化率的影响
Foods. 2020 Feb 16;9(2):201. doi: 10.3390/foods9020201.