Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858 Côte-Des-Neiges Road, 3Rd Floor, Montreal, Québec, H3S 1Z1, Canada.
School of Rehabilitation Science, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Jul 20;24(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02085-7.
Family physicians had to deliver care remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic. Their efforts highlighted the importance of developing a primary care telemedicine (TM) model. TM has the potential to provide a high-quality option for primary care delivery. However, it poses unique challenges for older adults. Our aim was therefore to explore the effects of TM and the determinants of its use in primary care for older adults.
In this systematic mixed studies review, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINHAL, AgeLine, DARE, Cochrane Library, and clinical trials research registers were searched for articles in English, French or Russian. Two reviewers performed study selection, data extraction and assessment of study quality. TM's effects were reported through the tabulation of key variables. TM use determinants were interpreted using thematic analysis based on Chang's framework. All data were integrated using a joint display matrix.
From 3,328 references identified, 20 studies were included. They used either phone (n = 8), videoconference (n = 9) or both (n = 3). Among studies reporting positive outcomes in TM experience, 'user habit or preferences' was the most cited barrier and 'location and travel time' was the most cited facilitator. Only one study reported negative outcomes in TM experience and reported 'comfort with patient communication' and 'user interface, intended use or usability' as barriers, and 'technology skills and knowledge' and 'location and travel time' as facilitators. Among studies reporting positive outcomes in service use and usability, no barrier or facilitator was cited more than once. Only one study reported a positive outcome in health-related and behavioural outcomes.
TM in older adults' primary care generally led to positive experiences, high satisfaction and generated an interest towards alternative healthcare delivery model. Future research should explore its efficacy on clinical, health-related and healthcare services use.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,家庭医生不得不远程提供医疗服务。他们的努力突显了开发初级保健远程医疗 (TM) 模式的重要性。TM 有可能为初级保健提供高质量的选择。然而,它给老年人带来了独特的挑战。因此,我们的目的是探讨 TM 的效果及其在老年人初级保健中的使用决定因素。
在这项系统的混合研究综述中,我们在英语、法语或俄语的 MEDLINE、PsycINFO、EMBASE、CINHAL、AgeLine、DARE、Cochrane 图书馆和临床试验研究登记处搜索了文章。两名审查员进行了研究选择、数据提取和研究质量评估。通过列表现有变量报告 TM 的效果。根据 Chang 的框架,使用主题分析来解释 TM 使用的决定因素。所有数据都使用联合展示矩阵进行整合。
从 3328 篇参考文献中,共纳入了 20 项研究。它们使用电话(n=8)、视频会议(n=9)或两者兼用(n=3)。在报告 TM 体验积极结果的研究中,“用户习惯或偏好”是被引用最多的障碍,“地点和旅行时间”是被引用最多的促进因素。只有一项研究报告了 TM 体验的负面结果,报告了“与患者沟通的舒适度”和“用户界面、预期用途或可用性”作为障碍,以及“技术技能和知识”和“地点和旅行时间”作为促进因素。在报告服务使用和可用性积极结果的研究中,没有一个障碍或促进因素被引用超过一次。只有一项研究报告了在健康相关和行为结果方面的积极结果。
老年人初级保健中的 TM 通常会带来积极的体验、高度的满意度,并引起对替代医疗服务提供模式的兴趣。未来的研究应该探索其在临床、健康相关和医疗服务使用方面的疗效。