Diarsvitri Wienta, Yanagihara Angel Anne
Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hang Tuah University, Surabaya 60244, Indonesia.
Department of Tropical Medicine, Medical Microbiology and Pharmacology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, The University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA.
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2023 Jul;11(3):141-146. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2023.98788.1808.
Lethal box jellyfish envenomation has been reported in Indonesia and other countries; therefore, medical students should be equipped with related knowledge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of summative exams by student cohort and gender and determine the factors that contribute to success in the summative exams after novel intensive instruction in box jellyfish envenomation pathophysiology and first aid in undergraduate medical students in Surabaya, Indonesia.
This study used explanatory sequential mixed methods, consisting of a cross-sectional study and interviews. A total population sampling of 203 sixth-semester students was employed. Student cohort, gender, previous semester grade point average (GPA), and English proficiency test (EPT) were considered. All statistical tests were carried out using IBM® SPSS® Statistics version 24.0 for Macintosh. The study was complemented by interviews conducted with 20 students.
The one-way ANOVA test showed that students from the 2016 cohort had significantly higher mean scores in the exam than the 2015 and 2014 cohorts (p=0.002). Independent samples t-test showed that such differences were not gender-specific (p=0.249). In the binary logistic regression, the GPA in the previous semester was the only factor that contributed to success in the summative exam (OR 3.031, 95% CI: 1.520-6.044). All students commented that the lecture and practicum were interesting and beneficial. However, some considered that the language barrier might have prevented them from understanding the topic well.
Results of the summative exam differed by the student cohorts, and previous semester GPA was a predictor of success in the summative exam.
在印度尼西亚和其他国家均有关于致命箱形水母蜇伤的报道;因此,医学生应具备相关知识。本研究的目的是按学生队列和性别评估总结性考试的结果,并确定在印度尼西亚泗水的本科医学生接受箱形水母蜇伤病理生理学和急救的新型强化教学后,促成总结性考试成功的因素。
本研究采用解释性序列混合方法,包括横断面研究和访谈。对203名第六学期学生进行了总体抽样。考虑了学生队列、性别、上一学期的平均绩点(GPA)和英语水平测试(EPT)。所有统计检验均使用适用于Macintosh的IBM® SPSS® Statistics 24.0版本进行。该研究通过对20名学生进行访谈得到补充。
单因素方差分析表明,2016队列的学生在考试中的平均分数显著高于2015和2014队列的学生(p = 0.002)。独立样本t检验表明,这种差异并非性别特异性(p = 0.249)。在二元逻辑回归中,上一学期的GPA是促成总结性考试成功的唯一因素(OR 3.031,95% CI:1.520 - 6.044)。所有学生都表示讲座和实习有趣且有益。然而,一些学生认为语言障碍可能阻碍了他们很好地理解该主题。
总结性考试的结果因学生队列而异,上一学期的GPA是总结性考试成功的一个预测指标。