Pelentritou Andria, Nguissi Nathalie Ata Nguepnjo, Iten Manuela, Haenggi Matthias, Zubler Frederic, Rossetti Andrea O, De Lucia Marzia
Laboratoire de Recherche en Neuroimagerie (LREN), University Hospital (CHUV) & University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Brain Commun. 2023 Jun 28;5(4):fcad190. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad190. eCollection 2023.
Early prognostication of long-term outcome of comatose patients after cardiac arrest remains challenging. Electroencephalography-based power spectra after cardiac arrest have been shown to help with the identification of patients with favourable outcome during the first day of coma. Here, we aim at comparing the power spectra prognostic value during the first and second day after coma onset following cardiac arrest and to investigate the impact of sedation on prognostication. In this cohort observational study, we included comatose patients ( = 91) after cardiac arrest for whom resting-state electroencephalography was collected on the first and second day after cardiac arrest in four Swiss hospitals. We evaluated whether the average power spectra values at 4.6-15.2 Hz were predictive of patients' outcome based on the best cerebral performance category score at 3 months, with scores ranging from 1 to 5 and dichotomized as favourable (1-2) and unfavourable (3-5). We assessed the effect of sedation and its interaction with the electroencephalography-based power spectra on patient outcome prediction through a generalized linear mixed model. Power spectra values provided 100% positive predictive value (95% confidence intervals: 0.81-1.00) on the first day of coma, with correctly predicted 18 out of 45 favourable outcome patients. On the second day, power spectra values were not predictive of patients' outcome (positive predictive value: 0.46, 95% confidence intervals: 0.19-0.75). On the first day, we did not find evidence of any significant contribution of sedative infusion rates to the patient outcome prediction ( > 0.05). Comatose patients' outcome prediction based on electroencephalographic power spectra is higher on the first compared with the second day after cardiac arrest. Sedation does not appear to impact patient outcome prediction.
心脏骤停后昏迷患者长期预后的早期预测仍然具有挑战性。心脏骤停后基于脑电图的功率谱已被证明有助于识别昏迷首日预后良好的患者。在此,我们旨在比较心脏骤停后昏迷发作首日和次日功率谱的预后价值,并研究镇静对预后预测的影响。在这项队列观察性研究中,我们纳入了瑞士四家医院心脏骤停后昏迷的患者(n = 91),在心脏骤停后的首日和次日收集其静息状态脑电图。我们根据3个月时最佳脑功能类别评分评估4.6 - 15.2 Hz的平均功率谱值是否能预测患者的预后,评分范围为1至5分,分为良好(1 - 2分)和不良(3 - 5分)两类。我们通过广义线性混合模型评估镇静及其与基于脑电图的功率谱对患者预后预测的相互作用。功率谱值在昏迷首日提供了100%的阳性预测值(95%置信区间:0.81 - 1.00),45例预后良好的患者中有18例被正确预测。在次日,功率谱值不能预测患者的预后(阳性预测值:0.46,95%置信区间:0.19 - 0.75)。在首日,我们没有发现镇静剂输注速率对患者预后预测有任何显著贡献的证据(P > 0.05)。与心脏骤停后的次日相比,基于脑电图功率谱对昏迷患者的预后预测在首日更高。镇静似乎不影响患者的预后预测。