Sambashivaiah Sucharita, Cope Mark, Mukherjea Ratna, Selvam Sumithra, George Nivya, Kuriyan Rebecca, Kurpad Anura V
Department of Physiology, St John's Medical College, Bengaluru, India.
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc., St Louis, MO, USA.
J Nutr Metab. 2023 Jul 10;2023:2622057. doi: 10.1155/2023/2622057. eCollection 2023.
Milk and legumes are good source of protein foods used to sustain muscle mass, but their effects on postprandial glucose homeostasis and energy metabolism may be different. This is relevant, for example, in the dietetic response to obesity or diabetes, where the intake of high-quality protein is often increased significantly. The objective of this study was to characterize the acute effect of whey and soy protein (15% vs. 30%) on glucose homeostasis, energy metabolism, and satiety. Healthy, normal body mass index (BMI) Indian adult males aged 20-35 years ( = 15) received 4 test meals (2 proteins (soy vs. whey) and 2 doses (15% vs. 30% protein: energy ratio)). Blood samples were collected serially after the meal to calculate the incremental area under the curve for plasma glucose and insulin. Energy expenditure and substrate oxidation were measured after the meal. Satiety was measured with a visual analogue scale. The insulin response, represented by the incremental area under the curve, was significantly higher for the 30% whey compared to the 30% soy protein meal ( < 0.01) but was not significantly different between the 15% protein doses. There were no differences in the plasma glucose response across protein sources or doses. The mean peak fat and carbohydrate oxidation, satiety, and energy expenditure did not differ between the protein sources and doses. In conclusion, at higher doses, whey protein has a greater insulinogenic response, compared to soy protein, and exhibits a dose-response effect. However, at lower doses, whey and soy protein elicit similar insulinogenic responses, making them equally effective protein sources in relation to glucose homoeostasis.
牛奶和豆类是用于维持肌肉量的优质蛋白质食物来源,但它们对餐后葡萄糖稳态和能量代谢的影响可能有所不同。例如,这在肥胖或糖尿病的饮食反应中具有相关性,因为在这些情况下,优质蛋白质的摄入量通常会显著增加。本研究的目的是描述乳清蛋白和大豆蛋白(15%与30%)对葡萄糖稳态、能量代谢和饱腹感的急性影响。20至35岁健康、正常体重指数(BMI)的印度成年男性(n = 15)接受了4次测试餐(2种蛋白质(大豆与乳清)和2种剂量(蛋白质:能量比为15%与30%))。餐后连续采集血样以计算血浆葡萄糖和胰岛素的曲线下增量面积。餐后测量能量消耗和底物氧化。用视觉模拟量表测量饱腹感。以曲线下增量面积表示的胰岛素反应,30%乳清蛋白餐比30%大豆蛋白餐显著更高(P < 0.01),但15%蛋白质剂量之间无显著差异。不同蛋白质来源或剂量的血浆葡萄糖反应无差异。蛋白质来源和剂量之间的平均峰值脂肪和碳水化合物氧化、饱腹感及能量消耗无差异。总之,在较高剂量下,与大豆蛋白相比,乳清蛋白具有更大的胰岛素生成反应,并呈现剂量反应效应。然而,在较低剂量下,乳清蛋白和大豆蛋白引发相似的胰岛素生成反应,使其在葡萄糖稳态方面成为同样有效的蛋白质来源。