Division of Women's Community and Population Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, the Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, and the Duke-UNC Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Durham, the Department of Epidemiology and the Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, the Carolina Population Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; the Department of Prevention and Community Health, George Washington Milken Institute of Public Health, Washington, DC; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Aug 1;142(2):350-359. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005225. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
To evaluate whether greater symptom severity can explain higher hysterectomy rates among premenopausal non-Hispanic Black compared with White patients in the U.S. South rather than potential overtreatment of Black patients.
Using electronic health record data from 1,703 patients who underwent hysterectomy in a large health care system in the U.S. South between 2014 and 2017, we assessed symptom severity to account for differences in hysterectomy rates for noncancerous conditions among premenopausal non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White, and Hispanic patients. We used Poisson generalized linear mixed modeling to estimate symptom severity (greater than the 75th percentile on composite symptom severity scores of bleeding, bulk, or pelvic pain) as a function of race-ethnicity. We calculated prevalence ratios (PRs). We controlled for factors both contra-indicating and contributing to hysterectomy.
The overall median age of non-Hispanic White (n=1,050), non-Hispanic Black (n=565), and Hispanic (n=158) patients was 40 years. The White and Black patients were mostly insured (insured greater than 95%), whereas the Hispanic patients were often uninsured (insured 58.9%). White and Black patients were mostly treated outside academic medical centers (nonmedical center: 63.7% and 58.4%, respectively); the opposite was true for Hispanic patients (nonmedical center: 34.2%). Black patients had higher bleeding severity scores compared with Hispanic and White patients (median 8, 7, and 4 respectively) and higher bulk scores (median 3, 1, and 0, respectively), but pain scores differed (median 3, 5, and 4, respectively). Black and Hispanic patients were disproportionately likely to have severe symptoms documented on two or more symptoms (referent: not severe on any symptoms) (adjusted PR [Black vs White] 3.02, 95% CI 2.29-3.99; adjusted PR [Hispanic vs White] 2.61, 95% CI 1.78-3.83). Although Black and Hispanic patients were more likely to experience severe symptoms, we found no racial and ethnic differences in the number of alternative treatments attempted before hysterectomy.
We did not find evidence of overtreatment of Black patients. Our findings suggest potential undertreatment of Black and Hispanic patients with uterine-sparing alternatives earlier in their disease progression.
评估在美国南部,与白人患者相比,非裔绝经前黑人患者的症状严重程度是否更高,导致子宫切除术率更高,而不是黑人患者过度治疗的可能性。
使用美国南部一家大型医疗保健系统在 2014 年至 2017 年间接受子宫切除术的 1703 名患者的电子健康记录数据,我们评估了症状严重程度,以说明非癌症患者的绝经前非裔黑人、非裔白人、和西班牙裔患者之间的子宫切除术率差异。我们使用泊松广义线性混合模型来估计症状严重程度(复合症状严重程度评分中出血、肿块或盆腔疼痛的第 75 个百分位以上)作为种族-民族的函数。我们计算了患病率比(PR)。我们控制了与子宫切除术相反和有助于子宫切除术的因素。
非裔白人(n=1050)、非裔黑人(n=565)和西班牙裔(n=158)患者的总体中位年龄为 40 岁。白人患者和黑人患者大多有保险(保险覆盖率大于 95%),而西班牙裔患者通常没有保险(保险覆盖率 58.9%)。白人患者和黑人患者大多在学术医疗中心之外接受治疗(非医疗中心:分别为 63.7%和 58.4%);而西班牙裔患者则相反(非医疗中心:34.2%)。与西班牙裔和白人患者相比,黑人患者的出血严重程度评分更高(中位数分别为 8、7 和 4),肿块评分也更高(中位数分别为 3、1 和 0),但疼痛评分不同(中位数分别为 3、5 和 4)。有记录表明黑人患者和西班牙裔患者有两种或两种以上症状严重的情况更为常见(参照:没有任何症状严重)(调整后的 PR [黑人 vs 白人] 3.02,95%CI 2.29-3.99;调整后的 PR [西班牙裔 vs 白人] 2.61,95%CI 1.78-3.83)。尽管黑人患者和西班牙裔患者更有可能经历严重的症状,但我们没有发现种族和民族在子宫切除术前尝试替代治疗的数量上存在差异。
我们没有发现对黑人患者过度治疗的证据。我们的研究结果表明,在疾病进展早期,黑人患者和西班牙裔患者对保留子宫的替代治疗方法可能存在潜在的治疗不足。