School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 24;11(6):e049390. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049390.
Pathways to diagnosis for women with endometriosis are frequently characterised with delays. Internationally, women face significant barriers and times to diagnosis. The prolonged time without a diagnosis may result in treatment delay, with clinical implications of chronic pain and an unknown effect on fertility outcomes. As delays in diagnosis extend, those suffering from endometriosis incur more cost and frequently experience a reduction in quality of life. The scoping review described in this protocol will (1) map current international scientific peer-reviewed and grey literature investigating pathways, timing, and delay of diagnosis of endometriosis, (2) define common concepts used in the literature, and (3) identify gaps for future examination and intervention development.
This protocol outlines a scoping review to investigate the current research focused on pathways, timing, and delays in endometriosis diagnosis. The scoping review uses the Joanna Briggs Institute Methodology. The researchers applied the Population, Concept, Context approach to form the research questions. A search string of key terms and Medical Subject Headings will be used to systematically search the PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. We will also search ClinicalTrials.gov and grey literature sources. The original search was performed in July 2020, and it will be rerun prior to the manuscript submission. Finally, the reference lists of included works will be reviewed for additional studies. The search results will be screened and reviewed according to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data will be extracted from the studies identified for final inclusion using a predetermined tool. The resulting data will be analysed to report the state of the science.
The proposed scoping review does not require review or approval by an ethical board. The researchers will disseminate the study results via conference presentations and publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
子宫内膜异位症患者的诊断途径常常存在延迟。在国际上,女性面临着巨大的诊断障碍和时间压力。长时间没有得到诊断可能导致治疗延迟,从而导致慢性疼痛,并对生育结果产生未知影响。随着诊断延迟的延长,患有子宫内膜异位症的患者会承担更多的成本,并经常经历生活质量的下降。本方案中描述的范围综述将(1)绘制当前国际科学同行评议和灰色文献调查子宫内膜异位症途径、时间和诊断延迟的情况,(2)定义文献中使用的常见概念,(3)确定未来检查和干预发展的空白。
本方案概述了一项范围综述,旨在调查当前专注于子宫内膜异位症诊断途径、时间和延迟的研究。该范围综述使用了 Joanna Briggs 研究所方法。研究人员应用人口、概念、背景方法来形成研究问题。将使用关键词和医学主题词搜索字符串系统地搜索 PubMed、CINAHL、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 数据库。我们还将搜索 ClinicalTrials.gov 和灰色文献来源。最初的搜索是在 2020 年 7 月进行的,在提交手稿之前将重新进行搜索。最后,将审查纳入作品的参考文献列表以获取其他研究。将根据预定的纳入和排除标准筛选和审查搜索结果。将使用预定的工具从确定最终纳入的研究中提取数据。将对所得数据进行分析,以报告科学现状。
拟议的范围综述不需要伦理委员会的审查或批准。研究人员将通过会议演讲和在同行评议期刊上发表来传播研究结果。