• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美容满意度和单一颅缝早闭手术治疗后的患者报告结局:系统评价。

Cosmetic satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes following surgical treatment of single-suture craniosynostosis: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Childs Nerv Syst. 2023 Dec;39(12):3571-3581. doi: 10.1007/s00381-023-06063-3. Epub 2023 Jul 21.

DOI:10.1007/s00381-023-06063-3
PMID:37477663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10684623/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study provides a systematic review on cosmetic satisfaction and other patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) of patients who underwent surgical treatment of SSC.

METHODS

A systematic review of all articles published from inception to 1 June 2022 was performed. Articles were included if they reported on subjective assessment of cosmetic satisfaction or other PROMs by patients or their families using questionnaires or interviews.

RESULTS

Twelve articles, describing 724 surgical treatments of SSC, met the inclusion criteria. Cosmetic satisfaction was evaluated in the following ways: 1) use of the VAS score, binary questions or a 5-point scale to rate general, facial or skull appearance; 2) use of an aesthetic outcome staging in which personal opinion was added to the treating surgeon's opinion; and 3) use of an evaluation of anatomical proportions of the skull and face. A trend towards an overall improvement in cosmetic satisfaction following surgical treatment of SSC was observed. Reported PROMs included general health, socioeconomic status, patients' and their families' rating of the normalcy and noticeability of their appearance and how much this bothered them, and patients' answers to the Youth Quality of Life with Facial Differences (YQOL-FD) questionnaire. No clear overall trend of the reported PROMs was identified.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review illuminates that there is a wide variation in outcomes for evaluating cosmetic satisfaction and other PROMs of patients who underwent surgical treatment of SSC, suggesting that further research is needed to develop an inclusive and uniform approach to assess these outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究对接受 SSC 手术治疗的患者的美容满意度和其他患者报告的结局(PROMs)进行了系统评价。

方法

对从成立到 2022 年 6 月 1 日发表的所有文章进行了系统评价。如果文章使用问卷或访谈报告了患者或其家属对美容满意度或其他 PROMs 的主观评估,则将其纳入。

结果

符合纳入标准的文章共有 12 篇,描述了 724 例 SSC 的手术治疗。美容满意度的评估方法如下:1)使用 VAS 评分、二项式问题或 5 分制来评价总体、面部或颅骨外观;2)使用美学结局分期,其中加入了治疗医生的个人意见;3)使用对颅骨和面部解剖比例的评估。观察到 SSC 手术后美容满意度总体呈改善趋势。报告的 PROMs 包括一般健康状况、社会经济状况、患者及其家属对自身外观正常性和可见性的评价以及他们对外观的困扰程度,以及患者对面部差异青少年生活质量问卷(YQOL-FD)的回答。未确定报告的 PROMs 的明确总体趋势。

结论

本系统评价表明,评估接受 SSC 手术治疗的患者的美容满意度和其他 PROMs 的结果存在很大差异,这表明需要进一步研究以开发一种全面和统一的方法来评估这些结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f24/10684623/18b1227a6b71/381_2023_6063_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f24/10684623/18b1227a6b71/381_2023_6063_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f24/10684623/18b1227a6b71/381_2023_6063_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cosmetic satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes following surgical treatment of single-suture craniosynostosis: a systematic review.美容满意度和单一颅缝早闭手术治疗后的患者报告结局:系统评价。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2023 Dec;39(12):3571-3581. doi: 10.1007/s00381-023-06063-3. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
2
Hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth.分娩过程中疼痛管理的催眠疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 19;2016(5):CD009356. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009356.pub3.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
4
Injection sclerotherapy for varicose veins.注射硬化疗法治疗静脉曲张。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 10;12(12):CD001732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001732.pub3.
5
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Communication skills training for mental health professionals working with people with severe mental illness.针对为重度精神疾病患者提供服务的心理健康专业人员的沟通技能培训。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 13;6(6):CD010006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010006.pub2.
10
Delayed antibiotic prescriptions for respiratory infections.呼吸道感染的延迟抗生素处方
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 7;9(9):CD004417. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004417.pub5.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-reported outcome measures more than fifteen years after treatment of sagittal or metopic craniosynostosis: a prospective cohort study.患者报告结局测量在矢状或额眶缝早闭治疗后超过十五年:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2024 Mar;40(3):769-777. doi: 10.1007/s00381-023-06202-w. Epub 2023 Nov 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Craniofacial characteristics and cosmetic satisfaction of patients with sagittal and metopic synostosis: a case-control study using 3D photogrammetric imaging.矢状缝和额缝早闭患者的颅面特征和美容满意度:一项使用三维摄影测量成像的病例对照研究。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2022 Apr;38(4):781-788. doi: 10.1007/s00381-021-05434-y. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
2
Parent and Patient Reported Outcomes for Head Shape in Children Undergoing Surgery for Single Suture Synostosis.家长和患者报告的儿童接受单一颅缝早闭手术后头型结果。
J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(1):19-25. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008117.
3
Do standard surgical techniques lead to satisfying aesthetic results in nonsyndromic sagittal suture synostosis?
标准的外科技术是否能在非综合征性矢状缝早闭中达到满意的美学效果?
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2021 Aug 13;28(5):502-507. doi: 10.3171/2021.4.PEDS2166. Print 2021 Nov 1.
4
Comparison of aesthetic outcomes between open and endoscopically treated sagittal craniosynostosis.冠状缝早闭的开放式与内镜式治疗的美学效果比较。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2021 Jul 30;28(4):432-438. doi: 10.3171/2021.3.PEDS20894. Print 2021 Oct 1.
5
Craniometric Measurements and Surgical Outcomes in Trigonocephaly Patients Who Underwent Surgical Treatment.接受手术治疗的三角头畸形患者的颅骨测量与手术结果
Cureus. 2021 Mar 3;13(3):e13676. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13676.
6
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
7
Assessing Facial Asymmetry in Postoperative Patients With Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis.评估单侧冠状缝早闭术后患者的面部不对称情况。
J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Jun;31(4):1000-1005. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006355.
8
Clinical and aesthetic outcome analysis of a case series of trigonocephaly patients after early fronto-orbital advancement.早期额眶前移治疗三角头畸形患者的临床与美学效果分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Sep;49(9):1115-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.02.017. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
9
A review of the management of single-suture craniosynostosis, past, present, and future.单缝颅缝早闭的治疗回顾:过去、现在与未来
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2019 Dec 1;24(6):622-631. doi: 10.3171/2019.7.PEDS18585.
10
Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies.系统评价中文献检索流程的定义:指导和支持研究的文献综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Aug 14;18(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0545-3.