Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 May 2;63(5):1251-1258. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead368.
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a leading cause of death in patients with SSc. The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of pericardial effusion in patients with SSc-PH.
Pulmonary Hypertension Assessment and Recognition of Outcomes in Scleroderma (PHAROS) is a prospective multicentre registry which enrolled patients with newly diagnosed SSc-PH from 2005 to 2016. The prognostic impact of pericardial effusion status, including those who ever or never had pericardial effusion, and those who had persistent or intermittent pericardial effusion, was analysed. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, log-rank test, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression were performed.
Of the 335 patients with SSc-PH diagnosed by right heart catheterization and documentation of pericardial effusion presence or absence on echocardiogram, 166 (50%) ever had pericardial effusion. Ever having pericardial effusion was not predictive of survival (log-rank test P = 0.49). Of the 245 SSc-PH patients who had at least two echocardiograms, 44% had a change in pericardial effusion status over an average of 4.3 years of follow up. Having a persistent pericardial effusion was an independent predictor of survival [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR)=2.34, 95% CI 1.20, 4.64, P = 0.002], while intermittent pericardial effusion was not a predictor of survival (aHR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.52, 1.56, P = 0.68), in a multivariable-adjusted analysis.
Persistent pericardial effusion, but not ever having had pericardial effusion or intermittent pericardial effusion, was independently associated with poorer survival. Incorporating information from serial echocardiograms may help clinicians better prognosticate survival in their SSc-PH patients.
肺动脉高压(PH)是硬皮病(SSc)患者死亡的主要原因。本研究旨在确定心包积液对 SSc-PH 患者的预后意义。
肺动脉高压评估和硬皮病患者预后识别(PHAROS)是一项前瞻性多中心登记研究,纳入了 2005 年至 2016 年期间新诊断为 SSc-PH 的患者。分析了心包积液状态的预后影响,包括曾有或从未有心包积液、持续或间歇性心包积液的患者。进行 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析、对数秩检验和多变量 Cox 比例风险回归。
在通过右心导管检查诊断为 SSc-PH 且超声心动图记录有心包积液存在或不存在的 335 例患者中,166 例(50%)曾有心包积液。曾有心包积液与生存无关(对数秩检验 P=0.49)。在至少有两次超声心动图检查的 245 例 SSc-PH 患者中,44%的患者在平均 4.3 年的随访中有心包积液状态的变化。持续存在的心包积液是生存的独立预测因素[调整后的危险比(aHR)=2.34,95%可信区间 1.204.64,P=0.002],而间歇性心包积液不是生存的预测因素(aHR=0.89,95%可信区间 0.521.56,P=0.68),在多变量调整分析中。
持续存在的心包积液,而不是曾有心包积液或间歇性心包积液,与较差的生存独立相关。从系列超声心动图中获取信息可能有助于临床医生更好地预测其 SSc-PH 患者的生存情况。