Mosleh Melika, Roshani Saeed, Coccia Mario
Birmingham Business School, College of Social Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Department of Technology and Entrepreneurship Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
Scientometrics. 2022;127(4):1931-1951. doi: 10.1007/s11192-022-04300-1. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
One of the main problems in scientometrics is to explore the factors that affect the growth of citations in publications to identify best practices of research policy to increase the diffusion of scientific research and knowledge in science and society. The principal purpose of this study is to analyze how research funding affects the citation-based performance of scientific output in vital research fields of life science, which is a critical province (area of knowledge) in science to improve the wellbeing of people. This study uses data from the Scopus database in 2015 (to assess the impact on citations in 2021, after more than 5 years) concerning different disciplines of life science, given by "agricultural and biological sciences", "biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology", "Immunology and microbiology", "neuroscience" and "pharmacology, toxicology and pharmaceutics". Results demonstrate that although journals publish un-funded articles more than funded publications in all disciplines of life science, the fraction of total citations in funded papers is higher than the share in the total number of publications. In short, funded documents receive more citations than un-funded papers in all research fields of life science under study. Findings also support that citations of total (funded + un-funded), funded, and un-funded published papers have a power-law distribution in all five research fields of life science. Original results here reveal a general property in scientific development: funded research has a higher scaling potential than un-funded publications. Critical implications of research policy, systematized in a decision-making matrix, suggest that R&D investments in "Neuroscience" can generate a positive impact of scientific results in science and society-in terms of citations-higher than other research fields in medicine. Overall, then, results here can explain some characteristics driving scientific change and help policymakers and scholars to allocate resources towards research fields that facilitate the development and diffusion of scientific research and knowledge in life science for positive societal impact.
科学计量学的主要问题之一是探索影响出版物中引文增长的因素,以确定研究政策的最佳实践,从而促进科学研究和知识在科学及社会中的传播。本研究的主要目的是分析研究资金如何影响生命科学重要研究领域中基于引文的科研产出表现,生命科学是科学领域中关乎改善人类福祉的关键领域。本研究使用了2015年Scopus数据库的数据(以评估5年多后对2021年引文的影响),涉及生命科学的不同学科,包括“农业与生物科学”、“生物化学、遗传学与分子生物学”、“免疫学与微生物学”、“神经科学”以及“药理学、毒理学与制药学”。结果表明,尽管在生命科学的所有学科中,期刊发表的无资助文章多于有资助的出版物,但有资助论文的总引文中所占比例高于其在出版物总数中的份额。简而言之,在所研究的生命科学的所有研究领域中,有资助的文献比无资助的论文获得更多引用。研究结果还支持,在生命科学的所有五个研究领域中,已发表的总(有资助+无资助)论文、有资助论文和无资助论文的引文都呈现幂律分布。此处的原始结果揭示了科学发展中的一个普遍特性:有资助的研究比无资助的出版物具有更高的扩展潜力。在决策矩阵中系统化的研究政策的关键影响表明,对“神经科学”的研发投资在科学和社会方面(就引文而言)能够产生比医学中的其他研究领域更大的科学成果积极影响。总体而言,此处的结果可以解释推动科学变革的一些特征,并帮助政策制定者和学者将资源分配到有助于生命科学领域科学研究和知识的发展与传播以产生积极社会影响的研究领域。