• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别患者对公共医疗服务不平等的认知:来自印度一个行政区的证据。

Identifying Patient Perceptions of Inequality in Public Health Care Services: Evidence From a Single Indian Administrative District.

作者信息

Biswas Barnali, Roy Piyal Basu

机构信息

Department of Geography, Cooch Behar Panchanan Barma University, Cooch Behar, India.

出版信息

J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2023 Jul 18;10(3):121-127. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.2013. eCollection 2023 Summer.

DOI:10.17294/2330-0698.2013
PMID:37483556
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10358969/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Assessment of patient experiences is an essential step to revamp patient-centered care and identify systemic effectiveness as part of universal health coverage. This paper analyzes the variation of health care at different levels of the public health care system in India by measuring patients' experience with the care they have received in the Alipurduar district of India.

METHODS

From May 2021 to April 2022, stratified sampling technique was applied to collect primary data from 450 patients having different health problems from different levels of the public health care system. In addition, Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey results were used to evaluate patient experience, with the reliability of questions measured by Cronbach's alpha. Collected data were categorized with the help of exploratory factor analysis; after which, analysis of variance and post-hoc tests were applied to understand specific variations in patient experiences.

RESULTS

This study identified that the services delivered in the health centers were not suitable (6.160 out of 10) to fulfill the needs of the patients. Among the three domains of health care services - namely, proficiency, tangibility, and information - the experience of patients significantly varied (P<0.001) when comparing primary, secondary, and tertiary levels of the public health care system.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving services from the centers under the tertiary level have expressed lesser satisfaction than those patients who have received care at primary or secondary levels because of excessive patient load, inadequate manpower, and other infrastructure deficits at the tertiary level.

摘要

目的

评估患者体验是改进以患者为中心的医疗服务并确定作为全民健康覆盖一部分的系统有效性的重要步骤。本文通过衡量印度阿里布尔杜阿尔地区患者接受医疗服务的体验,分析了印度公共医疗系统不同层面医疗服务的差异。

方法

2021年5月至2022年4月,采用分层抽样技术从公共医疗系统不同层面患有不同健康问题的450名患者中收集原始数据。此外,利用医疗服务提供者和系统消费者评估(CAHPS)调查结果来评估患者体验,问题的可靠性通过克朗巴哈系数进行衡量。收集到的数据借助探索性因素分析进行分类;之后,应用方差分析和事后检验来了解患者体验的具体差异。

结果

本研究发现,健康中心提供的服务(满分10分,得6.160分)无法满足患者需求。在医疗服务的三个领域——即专业性、有形性和信息方面——比较公共医疗系统的初级、二级和三级层面时,患者的体验存在显著差异(P<0.001)。

结论

由于三级层面患者负担过重、人力不足以及其他基础设施短缺,在三级层面中心接受服务的患者比在初级或二级层面接受治疗的患者满意度更低。

相似文献

1
Identifying Patient Perceptions of Inequality in Public Health Care Services: Evidence From a Single Indian Administrative District.识别患者对公共医疗服务不平等的认知:来自印度一个行政区的证据。
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2023 Jul 18;10(3):121-127. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.2013. eCollection 2023 Summer.
2
A Study on the Experience of Patients regarding the Quality of Healthcare services provided in the Alipurduar District of India.印度阿利普尔都尔地区患者对医疗服务质量体验的研究。
J Healthc Qual Res. 2020 Jul-Aug;35(4):237-244. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
3
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Evaluation of the consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems in-center hemodialysis survey.医疗机构和中心血液透析患者评估调查。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Jun 6;9(6):1099-108. doi: 10.2215/CJN.10121013. Epub 2014 May 15.
6
Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures?360度反馈调查结果与患者满意度指标有关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 May;473(5):1590-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3981-3.
7
[Patient-centered medicine for tuberculosis medical services].[以患者为中心的结核病医疗服务]
Kekkaku. 2012 Dec;87(12):795-808.
8
9
Access to care for childhood cancers in India: perspectives of health care providers and the implications for universal health coverage.印度儿童癌症的医疗服务可及性:卫生保健提供者的观点及其对全民健康覆盖的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 3;20(1):1641. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09758-3.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Outbreak prone communicable diseases of public health importance in the northern districts of West Bengal - Current status & the way forward.孟加拉邦西部北部地区具有公共卫生重要性的易暴发传染病 - 当前状况和未来方向。
Indian J Med Res. 2021 Mar;153(3):358-366. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_607_21.
2
A Study on the Experience of Patients regarding the Quality of Healthcare services provided in the Alipurduar District of India.印度阿利普尔都尔地区患者对医疗服务质量体验的研究。
J Healthc Qual Res. 2020 Jul-Aug;35(4):237-244. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
3
Patient Experience in Primary Care: A Systematic Review of CG-CAHPS Surveys.基层医疗中的患者体验:CG-CAHPS 调查的系统评价
J Patient Exp. 2019 Jun;6(2):93-102. doi: 10.1177/2374373518793143. Epub 2018 Aug 12.
4
Differences in Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group Survey Scores by Recency of the Last Visit: Implications for Comparability of Periodic and Continuous Sampling.消费者对医疗保健提供者和系统临床医生和小组调查评分的评估差异按最近一次就诊时间的不同:对定期和连续抽样可比性的影响。
Med Care. 2019 Dec;57(12):e80-e86. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001134.
5
Strategies for Ensuring Quality Health Care in India: Experiences From the Field.印度确保优质医疗保健的策略:实地经验
Indian J Community Med. 2019 Jan-Mar;44(1):1-3. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_65_19.
6
Universal health coverage in India: Progress achieved & the way forward.印度的全民健康覆盖:已取得的进展及未来方向。
Indian J Med Res. 2018 Apr;147(4):327-329. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_616_18.
7
Perceived challenges to achieving universal health coverage: a cross-sectional survey of social health insurance managers/administrators in China.实现全民健康覆盖面临的感知挑战:对中国社会医疗保险管理人员/行政人员的横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 2;7(5):e014425. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014425.
8
Inequality and the health-care system in the USA.美国的不平等与医疗保健系统。
Lancet. 2017 Apr 8;389(10077):1431-1441. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30398-7.
9
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
10
Health systems in India.印度的卫生系统。
J Perinatol. 2016 Dec;36(s3):S9-S12. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.184.