• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吸入器替换的环境影响:日本国民健康保险索赔数据库的碳足迹与经济计算

The environmental impact of inhaler replacement: A carbon footprint and economic calculation of the National Database of Health Insurance Claims in Japan.

作者信息

Nagasaki Kazuya, Kaji Yuki, Wada Yoshiki, Sasaki Takafumi

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Mito Kyodo General Hospital University of Tsukuba Ibaraki Japan.

Department of General Medicine International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital Chiba Japan.

出版信息

J Gen Fam Med. 2023 Apr 11;24(4):207-214. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.622. eCollection 2023 Jul.

DOI:10.1002/jgf2.622
PMID:37484126
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10357098/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drugs are a major source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from healthcare systems. Pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) have raised concerns over their environmental impact due to GHG emissions. Evaluations and reduction strategies for GHGs have been primarily studied in Europe, but not in other regions, including Japan. Therefore, our objective was to calculate the carbon footprint of inhalers in Japan and evaluate their reduction scenarios.

METHODS

Using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims, our analysis was conducted on inhaler prescriptions in Japan for the fiscal year of 2019. We calculated the number of inhalers used, GHG emissions, and total costs. Next, we simulated the environmental and economic impacts of three reduction scenarios: the first scenario replaced pMDI with dry power inhalers, followed by age-based replacements. In the last scenario, we replaced pMDI with a propellant with a lower global warming potential.

RESULTS

All inhaler-related GHG emissions were 202 ktCOe, of which 90.9% were attributed to pMDI use. Scenario analysis demonstrated that replacing 10% pMDI with DPI would reduce emissions by 6.7%, with a relatively modest increase in cost; substituting 10% of pMDI used by adults (excluding children and older adults) with alternative inhalers would reduce emissions by 6.1%, with a 0.7% increase in cost; and, replacing 10% of pMDI propellants with lower global warming potential would reduce emissions by 9.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Selecting appropriate inhalers can mitigate GHG emissions in Japan, but its impact will be less than in other countries. Nevertheless, collaborative efforts between physicians, patients, and pharmaceutical companies are necessary to reduce GHG emissions.

摘要

背景

药物是医疗保健系统温室气体(GHG)排放的主要来源。由于温室气体排放,压力定量吸入器(pMDIs)引发了人们对其环境影响的担忧。温室气体的评估和减排策略主要在欧洲进行了研究,但在包括日本在内的其他地区尚未开展。因此,我们的目标是计算日本吸入器的碳足迹并评估其减排方案。

方法

利用全国健康保险索赔数据库,我们对2019财年日本的吸入器处方进行了分析。我们计算了吸入器的使用数量、温室气体排放量和总成本。接下来,我们模拟了三种减排方案的环境和经济影响:第一种方案是用干粉吸入器替代压力定量吸入器,随后按年龄进行替代。在最后一种方案中,我们用全球变暖潜能值较低的推进剂替代压力定量吸入器的推进剂。

结果

所有与吸入器相关的温室气体排放量为202千吨二氧化碳当量,其中90.9%归因于压力定量吸入器的使用。情景分析表明,用干粉吸入器替代10%的压力定量吸入器可使排放量减少6.7%,成本相对适度增加;用替代吸入器替代10%成年人(不包括儿童和老年人)使用的压力定量吸入器可使排放量减少6.1%,成本增加0.7%;用全球变暖潜能值较低的推进剂替代10%的压力定量吸入器推进剂可使排放量减少9.3%。

结论

选择合适的吸入器可以减轻日本的温室气体排放,但其影响将小于其他国家。尽管如此,医生、患者和制药公司之间的合作努力对于减少温室气体排放是必要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03f5/10357098/49f82b1c113b/JGF2-24-207-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03f5/10357098/49f82b1c113b/JGF2-24-207-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03f5/10357098/49f82b1c113b/JGF2-24-207-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The environmental impact of inhaler replacement: A carbon footprint and economic calculation of the National Database of Health Insurance Claims in Japan.吸入器替换的环境影响:日本国民健康保险索赔数据库的碳足迹与经济计算
J Gen Fam Med. 2023 Apr 11;24(4):207-214. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.622. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Respiratory Treatments: Results from the SABA CARBON International Study.呼吸治疗的温室气体排放:来自 SABA CARBON 国际研究的结果。
Adv Ther. 2023 Nov;40(11):4836-4856. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02663-2. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
3
[Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by inhaler choice in the therapy of asthma and COPD patients].[通过选择吸入器减少哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者治疗中的温室气体排放]
Pneumologie. 2022 May;76(5):321-329. doi: 10.1055/a-1771-5292. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
4
Impact of choice of inhalers for asthma care on global carbon footprint and societal costs: a long-term economic evaluation.哮喘护理中吸入器选择对全球碳足迹和社会成本的影响:一项长期经济评估。
J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):940-953. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2088196.
5
Reducing carbon footprint of inhalers: analysis of climate and clinical implications of different scenarios in five European countries.减少吸入器的碳足迹:在五个欧洲国家分析不同方案的气候和临床影响。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021 Dec;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001071.
6
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
7
Impact of inhalers used in the treatment of respiratory diseases on global warming.治疗呼吸疾病的吸入器对全球变暖的影响。
Adv Respir Med. 2021;89(4):427-438. doi: 10.5603/ARM.a2021.0092.
8
Costs of switching to low global warming potential inhalers. An economic and carbon footprint analysis of NHS prescription data in England.切换至低全球变暖潜势吸入器的成本。基于英格兰国民保健服务处方数据的经济和碳足迹分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 29;9(10):e028763. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028763.
9
Can we minimize carbon footprint by using "greener" inhalers and improve clinical outcome at the same time in asthma therapy?在哮喘治疗中,我们能否通过使用“更环保”的吸入器来最小化碳足迹,同时改善临床结果?
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2021 Aug 16;49(292):252-254.
10
Carbon footprint of inhalers in COPD therapy in 2018 and 2019 in Poland in response to the Kigali amendment.2018 年和 2019 年波兰应对《基加利修正案》对 COPD 治疗中吸入器的碳足迹。
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2020 Dec 22;48(288):391-393.

引用本文的文献

1
Inhaler sustainability in asthma and COPD care: a systematic review.哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病护理中吸入器的可持续性:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 25;15(7):e098052. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098052.
2
[Inhaled Respiratory Therapy and Global Warming].[吸入式呼吸治疗与全球变暖]
Farm Comunitarios. 2025 Feb 23;17(2):21-29. doi: 10.33620/FC.2173-9218.(2025).11. eCollection 2025 Apr 15.
3
Strategies and tactics to reduce the impact of healthcare on climate change: systematic review.减少医疗保健对气候变化影响的策略和方法:系统评价。

本文引用的文献

1
Turning green: the impact of changing to more eco-friendly respiratory healthcare - a carbon and cost analysis of Dutch prescription data.转绿:向更环保的呼吸医疗保健转变的影响——荷兰处方数据的碳和成本分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 14;12(6):e055546. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055546.
2
Effects of switching from a metered dose inhaler to a dry powder inhaler on climate emissions and asthma control: post-hoc analysis.从计量吸入器切换至干粉吸入器对气候排放物和哮喘控制的影响:事后分析。
Thorax. 2022 Dec;77(12):1187-1192. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-218088. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
3
The environmental impact of inhaled therapy: making informed treatment choices.
BMJ. 2024 Oct 8;387:e081284. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081284.
吸入疗法的环境影响:做出明智的治疗选择。
Eur Respir J. 2022 Jul 21;60(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02106-2021. Print 2022 Jul.
4
Reducing carbon footprint of inhalers: analysis of climate and clinical implications of different scenarios in five European countries.减少吸入器的碳足迹:在五个欧洲国家分析不同方案的气候和临床影响。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021 Dec;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001071.
5
The environmental impact of inhalers for asthma: A green challenge and a golden opportunity.哮喘吸入器的环境影响:绿色挑战与黄金机遇。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jul;88(7):3016-3022. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15135. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
6
Impact of inhalers used in the treatment of respiratory diseases on global warming.治疗呼吸疾病的吸入器对全球变暖的影响。
Adv Respir Med. 2021;89(4):427-438. doi: 10.5603/ARM.a2021.0092.
7
Call for Emergency Action to Limit Global Temperature Increases, Restore Biodiversity, and Protect Health.呼吁采取紧急行动限制全球气温上升、恢复生物多样性并保护健康。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 16;385(12):1134-1137. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2113200. Epub 2021 Sep 5.
8
Health effects of climate change: an overview of systematic reviews.气候变化对健康的影响:系统综述概述。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 9;11(6):e046333. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046333.
9
Health care's response to climate change: a carbon footprint assessment of the NHS in England.医疗保健应对气候变化:英格兰国民保健制度的碳足迹评估。
Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Feb;5(2):e84-e92. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30271-0.
10
Inhaler devices in asthma and COPD patients - a prospective cross-sectional study on inhaler preferences and error rates.哮喘和 COPD 患者的吸入器设备 - 关于吸入器偏好和错误率的前瞻性横断面研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2020 Aug 20;20(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-01246-z.