• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转绿:向更环保的呼吸医疗保健转变的影响——荷兰处方数据的碳和成本分析。

Turning green: the impact of changing to more eco-friendly respiratory healthcare - a carbon and cost analysis of Dutch prescription data.

机构信息

National Health Care Institute, Diemen, The Netherlands.

Respiratory Medicine, Van Weel-Bethesda Hospital, Middelharnis, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 14;12(6):e055546. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055546.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055546
PMID:35701064
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9198801/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and soft mist inhalers have a substantially lower global warming potential than pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs). To help mitigate climate change, we assessed the potential emission reduction in CO equivalents when replacing pMDIs by non-propellant inhalers (NPIs) in Dutch respiratory healthcare and estimated the associated cost.

DESIGN

We performed a descriptive analysis of prescription data from two national databases of two independent governmental bodies. First, we calculated the number of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma that were using inhalation medication (2020). Second, we calculated the number and total of daily defined doses of pMDIs and NPIs including DPIs and soft mist inhalers, as well as the number of dispensed spacers per patient (2020). Third, we estimated the potential emission reduction in CO equivalents if 70% of patients would switch from using pMDIs to using NPIs. Fourth, we performed a budget impact analysis.

SETTING

Dutch respiratory healthcare.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The carbon footprint of current inhalation medication and the environmental and financial impact of replacing pMDIs with NPIs.

RESULTS

In 2020, 1.4 million patients used inhalers for COPD or asthma treatment. A total of 364 million defined daily doses from inhalers were dispensed of which 49.6% were dispensed through pMDIs. We estimated that this could be reduced by 70% which would lead to an annual reduction in greenhouse gas emission of 63 million kg.CO2 equivalents saving at best EUR 49.1 million per year.

CONCLUSIONS

In the Netherlands, substitution of pMDIs to NPIs for eligible patients is theoretically safe and in accordance with medical guidelines, while reducing greenhouse gas emission by 63 million kg.CO2 equivalents on average and saving at best EUR 49.1 million per year. This study confirms the potential climate and economic benefit of delivering a more eco-friendly respiratory care.

摘要

目的

干粉吸入器(DPIs)和软雾吸入器的全球变暖潜能值明显低于压力定量吸入器(pMDIs)。为了帮助减轻气候变化,我们评估了当用非推进式吸入器(NPIs)替代 pMDIs 时,以 CO 当量计的潜在减排量,并估计了相关成本。

设计

我们对来自两个独立政府机构的两个国家数据库的处方数据进行了描述性分析。首先,我们计算了使用吸入药物的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和哮喘患者人数(2020 年)。其次,我们计算了 pMDIs 和 NPIs(包括 DPIs 和软雾吸入器)的每日规定剂量数和总数,以及每位患者的定量吸入器数(2020 年)。第三,我们估计了如果 70%的患者从使用 pMDIs 改为使用 NPIs,那么 CO 当量的潜在减排量。第四,我们进行了预算影响分析。

设置

荷兰呼吸保健。

主要和次要结果

当前吸入药物的碳足迹,以及用 NPIs 替代 pMDIs 的环境和财务影响。

结果

2020 年,有 140 万患者使用吸入器治疗 COPD 或哮喘。共分发了 3.64 亿次吸入剂量,其中 49.6% 通过 pMDIs 分发。我们估计,这一比例可减少 70%,从而使温室气体年排放量减少 6300 万公斤.CO2 当量,每年最多可节省 4910 万欧元。

结论

在荷兰,为符合条件的患者替代 pMDIs 为 NPIs 在理论上是安全的,且符合医疗指南,同时平均减少 6300 万公斤.CO2 当量的温室气体排放,每年最多可节省 4910 万欧元。本研究证实了提供更环保的呼吸护理具有潜在的气候和经济效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1690/9198801/9026f81838f3/bmjopen-2021-055546f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1690/9198801/9026f81838f3/bmjopen-2021-055546f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1690/9198801/9026f81838f3/bmjopen-2021-055546f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Turning green: the impact of changing to more eco-friendly respiratory healthcare - a carbon and cost analysis of Dutch prescription data.转绿:向更环保的呼吸医疗保健转变的影响——荷兰处方数据的碳和成本分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 14;12(6):e055546. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055546.
2
Reducing carbon footprint of inhalers: analysis of climate and clinical implications of different scenarios in five European countries.减少吸入器的碳足迹:在五个欧洲国家分析不同方案的气候和临床影响。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021 Dec;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001071.
3
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
4
Thoughtful prescription of inhaled medication has the potential to reduce inhaler-related greenhouse gas emissions by 85.深思熟虑地开具吸入性药物处方,有可能将与吸入器相关的温室气体排放量减少 85%。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024 Sep 1;11(1):e001782. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001782.
5
[Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by inhaler choice in the therapy of asthma and COPD patients].[通过选择吸入器减少哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者治疗中的温室气体排放]
Pneumologie. 2022 May;76(5):321-329. doi: 10.1055/a-1771-5292. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
6
The environmental impact of inhaled therapy: making informed treatment choices.吸入疗法的环境影响:做出明智的治疗选择。
Eur Respir J. 2022 Jul 21;60(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02106-2021. Print 2022 Jul.
7
Impact of Asthma Inhalers on Global Climate: A Systematic Review of Their Carbon Footprint and Clinical Outcomes in Spain.哮喘吸入器对全球气候的影响:西班牙哮喘吸入器碳足迹及其临床结果的系统评价。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2023 Jul 27;33(4):250-262. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0887. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
8
Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Respiratory Treatments: Results from the SABA CARBON International Study.呼吸治疗的温室气体排放:来自 SABA CARBON 国际研究的结果。
Adv Ther. 2023 Nov;40(11):4836-4856. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02663-2. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
9
A narrative review on the Synchrobreathe™: A novel breath-actuated pressurised metered-dose inhaler for the treatment of obstructive airway diseases.关于 Synchrobreathe™的叙述性综述:一种新型的呼吸驱动的压力定量吸入器,用于治疗阻塞性气道疾病。
Respir Med. 2023 Nov-Dec;219:107435. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107435. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
10
Climate change in healthcare: Exploring the potential role of inhaler prescribing.医疗保健中的气候变化:探索吸入器处方的潜在作用。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020 Dec;8(6):e00675. doi: 10.1002/prp2.675.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of environmental impact in healthcare providers' choices of inhalers for treatment of asthma and COPD: a discrete choice experiment.环境影响在医疗服务提供者选择用于治疗哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病的吸入器方面的作用:一项离散选择实验。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Sep 3;26(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02941-8.
2
Prescriber Attitudes Towards Prescribing 'Green' Inhalers in Secondary Care.二级医疗保健机构中开处方者对开具“绿色”吸入器的态度。
Cureus. 2025 Jul 29;17(7):e88986. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88986. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Trends in inhaler use and associated carbon footprint: a sales data-based study in Europe.

本文引用的文献

1
Views of health professionals on climate change and health: a multinational survey study.卫生专业人员对气候变化与健康的看法:一项多国调查研究。
Lancet Planet Health. 2021 May;5(5):e316-e323. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00053-X. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
2
Climate change, environmental sustainability and health care quality.气候变化、环境可持续性与医疗保健质量。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Mar 5;33(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa036.
3
Environmental Awareness for Patients with COPD Undergoing Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Is It of Added Value?
吸入器使用趋势及相关碳足迹:一项基于欧洲销售数据的研究
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025 Sep 1;12(1):e002424. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002424.
4
Inhaler sustainability in asthma and COPD care: a systematic review.哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病护理中吸入器的可持续性:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 25;15(7):e098052. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098052.
5
Are we ready for climate-friendly inhaler prescription and usage? A qualitative study among primary and secondary care patients, healthcare professionals and healthcare insurers in the Netherlands.我们是否做好准备应对气候友好型吸入器的处方和使用?荷兰初级和二级护理患者、医疗保健专业人员及医疗保险公司的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 3;15(7):e086484. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086484.
6
How to reduce carbon footprints in asthma.如何减少哮喘中的碳足迹。
ERJ Open Res. 2025 Jun 23;11(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00032-2025. eCollection 2025 May.
7
[Inhaled Respiratory Therapy and Global Warming].[吸入式呼吸治疗与全球变暖]
Farm Comunitarios. 2025 Feb 23;17(2):21-29. doi: 10.33620/FC.2173-9218.(2025).11. eCollection 2025 Apr 15.
8
Strategies and tactics to reduce the impact of healthcare on climate change: systematic review.减少医疗保健对气候变化影响的策略和方法:系统评价。
BMJ. 2024 Oct 8;387:e081284. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081284.
9
Reductions in inhaler greenhouse gas emissions by addressing care gaps in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an analysis.解决哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病护理缺口以减少吸入器温室气体排放:一项分析。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2023 Sep;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001716.
10
Sustainability as an Intrinsic Moral Concern for Solidaristic Health Care.将可持续性视为团结医疗保健的内在道德关注点。
Health Care Anal. 2024 Dec;32(4):261-271. doi: 10.1007/s10728-023-00469-5. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺康复治疗中的环境意识:是否有附加价值?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 29;17(21):7968. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217968.
4
Climate change in healthcare: Exploring the potential role of inhaler prescribing.医疗保健中的气候变化:探索吸入器处方的潜在作用。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020 Dec;8(6):e00675. doi: 10.1002/prp2.675.
5
A pathway to net zero emissions for healthcare.医疗保健领域实现净零排放的途径。
BMJ. 2020 Oct 1;371:m3785. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3785.
6
The environmental footprint of health care: a global assessment.医疗保健的环境足迹:全球评估。
Lancet Planet Health. 2020 Jul;4(7):e271-e279. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30121-2.
7
Carbon footprint impact of the choice of inhalers for asthma and COPD.哮喘和 COPD 患者吸入器选择的碳足迹影响。
Thorax. 2020 Jan;75(1):82-84. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-213744. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
8
Costs of switching to low global warming potential inhalers. An economic and carbon footprint analysis of NHS prescription data in England.切换至低全球变暖潜势吸入器的成本。基于英格兰国民保健服务处方数据的经济和碳足迹分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 29;9(10):e028763. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028763.
9
Sustainability in quality improvement: redefining value.质量改进中的可持续性:重新定义价值。
Future Healthc J. 2018 Jun;5(2):88-93. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.5-2-88.
10
The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: from 25 years of inaction to a global transformation for public health.《柳叶刀》健康与气候变化倒计时:从25年的不作为到全球公共卫生转型。
Lancet. 2018 Feb 10;391(10120):581-630. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32464-9. Epub 2017 Oct 30.