• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乌帕替尼对类风湿关节炎患者消化事件风险的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Impact of upadacitinib on the risk of digestive events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Liu-Yan Nie, Kun Zhao, Cheng Xu, Ming-Hao Liu, Xue-Xiao Jin, Yong-Mei Han

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

Center for Rehabilitation Medicine, Rehabilitation & Sports Medicine Research Institute of Zhejiang Province, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Jun 4;9(6):e17002. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17002. eCollection 2023 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17002
PMID:37484342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10361017/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is an effective treatment option for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but its use has been associated with an increased risk of digestive events. This systematic review aimed to investigate the risk of digestive events in RA patients treated with UPA.

METHODS

Systematic searches of electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE) from inception to September 2022 were conducted to locate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared UPA with control treatment and reported digestive events in RA patients. We pooled data using the random-effects model and meta-analysis was conducted by Stata software.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed, with a total of 6103 patients. Compared with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), pooled analysis of 8 trials revealed no statistical difference in hepatic disorder (HD) risk and gastrointestinal (GI) perforation (GIP) risk ((OR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.56, I = 0.00%); OR = 4.49, 95% CI 0.56 to 35.93, I = 0.00%)). When we considered the influence of UPA on the grade of liver enzymes, the data indicated that grade 3 and 4 elevations in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were infrequent. Additionally, a dose-dependent impact of UPA on the risks of HD was not observed. The results suggested no interaction by dose of drug, or indication for treatment of GIP risk.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that RA patients receiving UPA compared with csDMARDs had no significant increased risk associated with digestive events. Further long-term research of emerging data is urgently needed to gain a better understanding of the association between UPA and digestive events in the RA population.

摘要

背景

乌帕替尼(UPA)是一种口服的 Janus 激酶(JAK)抑制剂,是类风湿关节炎(RA)的一种有效治疗选择,但其使用与消化事件风险增加有关。本系统评价旨在调查接受 UPA 治疗的 RA 患者发生消化事件的风险。

方法

对电子数据库(PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 EMBASE)从创建至 2022 年 9 月进行系统检索,以查找比较 UPA 与对照治疗并报告 RA 患者消化事件的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们使用随机效应模型汇总数据,并通过 Stata 软件进行荟萃分析。

结果

10 项 RCT 符合纳入标准并进行了分析,共有 6103 名患者。与传统合成抗风湿药物(csDMARDs)相比,对 8 项试验的汇总分析显示,肝脏疾病(HD)风险和胃肠道(GI)穿孔(GIP)风险无统计学差异((OR = 1.16,95%CI 0.86 至 1.56,I = 0.00%);OR = 4.49,95%CI 0.56 至 35.93,I = 0.00%))。当我们考虑 UPA 对肝酶水平的影响时,数据表明天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)和丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)3 级和 4 级升高并不常见。此外,未观察到 UPA 对 HD 风险有剂量依赖性影响。结果表明药物剂量与 GIP 风险的治疗指征之间无相互作用。

结论

我们的结果表明,与 csDMARDs 相比,接受 UPA 治疗的 RA 患者发生消化事件的风险没有显著增加。迫切需要对新出现的数据进行进一步的长期研究,以更好地了解 UPA 与 RA 人群消化事件之间的关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80de/10361017/f3c681c74215/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80de/10361017/a3ea3d549e89/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80de/10361017/f3c681c74215/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80de/10361017/a3ea3d549e89/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80de/10361017/f3c681c74215/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of upadacitinib on the risk of digestive events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.乌帕替尼对类风湿关节炎患者消化事件风险的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 4;9(6):e17002. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17002. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Comparative efficacy of five approved Janus kinase inhibitors as monotherapy and combination therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.五种已获批的 Janus 激酶抑制剂作为单药治疗及联合治疗中重度活动性类风湿关节炎患者的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网状荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Apr 24;15:1387585. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1387585. eCollection 2024.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Comparative efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.类风湿关节炎中Janus激酶抑制剂与生物改善病情抗风湿药的疗效及安全性比较:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021 Mar 21;13:1759720X21999564. doi: 10.1177/1759720X21999564. eCollection 2021.
5
Effectiveness and safety of 99Tc-methylene diphosphonate as a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) in combination with conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 randomized controlled trials.99锝-亚甲基二膦酸盐作为一种改善病情抗风湿药(DMARD)与传统合成(cs)DMARD联合用于治疗类风湿关节炎的有效性和安全性:34项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 26;9(11):e21691. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21691. eCollection 2023 Nov.
6
Patient-reported outcomes of upadacitinib versus abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 12- and 24-week results of a phase 3 trial.接受生物改善病情抗风湿药物治疗反应不佳的类风湿关节炎患者中,upadacitinib 对比 abatacept 的患者报告结局:一项 3 期试验的 12 周和 24 周结果。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2022 Jun 24;24(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s13075-022-02813-x.
7
Impact of Upadacitinib on Laboratory Parameters and Related Adverse Events in Patients with RA: Integrated Data Up to 6.5 Years.乌帕替尼对类风湿关节炎患者实验室指标及相关不良事件的影响:长达6.5年的综合数据
Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Feb;11(1):157-175. doi: 10.1007/s40744-023-00624-3. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
8
Impact of Janus kinase inhibitors on risk of cardiovascular events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Janus 激酶抑制剂对类风湿关节炎患者心血管事件风险的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Aug;78(8):1048-1054. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214846. Epub 2019 May 14.
9
Incidence and risk factors for herpes zoster in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving upadacitinib: a pooled analysis of six phase III clinical trials.接受乌帕替尼治疗的类风湿关节炎患者带状疱疹的发生率和风险因素:六项 III 期临床试验的汇总分析。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Feb;81(2):206-213. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220822. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
10
Malignancy in the Upadacitinib Clinical Trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis, and Non-radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis.乌帕替尼治疗类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎、强直性脊柱炎和非放射性中轴型脊柱关节炎临床试验中的恶性肿瘤情况
Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Feb;11(1):97-112. doi: 10.1007/s40744-023-00621-6. Epub 2023 Nov 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Oral Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs with Antineoplastic Potential: a Review.具有抗肿瘤潜力的口服传统合成抗风湿药物:综述
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Apr;12(4):835-860. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00713-1. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
2
Safety of JAK inhibitors: focus on cardiovascular and thromboembolic events.JAK抑制剂的安全性:关注心血管和血栓栓塞事件。
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2022 Mar;18(3):233-244. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2022.2039630. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
3
Long-term safety and efficacy of upadacitinib or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results through 3 years from the SELECT-COMPARE study.
upadacitinib 或阿达木单抗治疗类风湿关节炎患者的长期安全性和疗效:SELECT-COMPARE 研究 3 年结果。
RMD Open. 2022 Feb;8(1). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002012.
4
Effect of JAK inhibitors on high- and low-density lipoprotein in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.JAK抑制剂对类风湿关节炎患者高密度脂蛋白和低密度脂蛋白的影响:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Mar;41(3):677-688. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-06003-z. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
5
Properties of FDA-approved small molecule protein kinase inhibitors: A 2022 update.FDA 批准的小分子蛋白激酶抑制剂的特性:2022 年更新。
Pharmacol Res. 2022 Jan;175:106037. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.106037. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
6
Upadacitinib in patients from China, Brazil, and South Korea with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to conventional therapy.在对常规治疗反应不足的中国、巴西和韩国的类风湿关节炎患者中使用 upadacitinib。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2021 Dec;24(12):1530-1539. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14235. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
7
The Safety Profile of Upadacitinib in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Japan.乌帕替尼在日本类风湿关节炎患者中的安全性特征。
Drug Saf. 2021 Jun;44(6):711-722. doi: 10.1007/s40264-021-01067-x. Epub 2021 May 27.
8
The safety of JAK-1 inhibitors.JAK-1 抑制剂的安全性。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 May 5;60(Suppl 2):ii24-ii30. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa895.
9
The Risk of Infections Associated With JAK Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.类风湿关节炎中 JAK 抑制剂相关感染风险:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Mar 1;28(2):e407-e414. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000001749.
10
Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib over 84 weeks in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (SELECT-SUNRISE).在日本类风湿关节炎患者中(SELECT-SUNRISE),乌帕替尼治疗 84 周的疗效和安全性。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 Jan 6;23(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02387-6.