Weng Chenghua, Xue Leixi, Wang Qing, Lu Wentian, Xu Jiajun, Liu Zhichun
Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Sanxiang Road No.1055, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215000, P.R. China.
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021 Mar 21;13:1759720X21999564. doi: 10.1177/1759720X21999564. eCollection 2021.
To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to at least one disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD).
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to April 2020. The active drugs included three JAK inhibitors and eight bDMARDs while the control drugs included placebo or conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Outcomes include American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and discontinuations for adverse events (AEs). We estimated summary odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) using network meta-analysis with random effects.
Eighty-eight RCTs with 31,566 patients were included. All JAK inhibitors and bDMARDs were more effective than placebo in ACR20 (ORs ranging between 3.05 and 5.61), DAS28 (WMDs ranging between -1.91 and -0.80) and HAQ-DI (WMDs ranging between -0.34 and -0.21). Tocilizumab, certolizumab pegol and upadacitinib showed relatively good efficacy in these three outcomes according to their relative ranking. Notably, tocilizumab was more effective than other active drugs in DAS28 (WMDs ranging between -1.11 and -0.49). Compared with the lower recommended doses, increasing the doses of JAK inhibitors (baricitinib 4 mg 2 mg, tofacitinib 10 mg 5 mg and upadacitinib 30 mg 15 mg) cannot provide significant additional benefits. In terms of discontinuations for AEs, all active drugs showed no significant difference compared with placebo except certolizumab pegol [OR 1.65, 95% credible interval (CrI) 1.06-2.61] and rituximab (3.17, 1.11-10.80).
Tocilizumab, certolizumab pegol and upadacitinib may have relatively good efficacy in patients with RA after treatment failure with csDMARDs. RA patients taking a JAK inhibitor may have a preference for a lower recommended dose.
评估在类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中,且对至少一种改善病情抗风湿药(DMARD)反应不足的情况下, Janus激酶(JAK)抑制剂与生物改善病情抗风湿药(bDMARD)的疗效和安全性对比。
检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和ClinicalTrials.gov,查找从开始到2020年4月的相关随机对照试验(RCT)。活性药物包括三种JAK抑制剂和八种bDMARD,对照药物包括安慰剂或传统合成改善病情抗风湿药(csDMARD)。结局指标包括美国风湿病学会20%反应率(ACR20)、28个关节疾病活动评分(DAS28)、健康评估问卷残疾指数(HAQ-DI)以及因不良事件(AE)停药情况。我们使用随机效应网络荟萃分析估计汇总比值比(OR)和加权平均差(WMD)。
纳入了88项RCT,共31566例患者。所有JAK抑制剂和bDMARD在ACR20(OR范围为3.05至5.61)、DAS28(WMD范围为-1.91至-0.80)和HAQ-DI(WMD范围为-0.34至-0.21)方面均比安慰剂更有效。根据相对排名,托珠单抗、赛妥珠单抗和乌帕替尼在这三个结局指标上显示出相对较好的疗效。值得注意的是,托珠单抗在DAS28方面比其他活性药物更有效(WMD范围为-1.11至-0.49)。与较低推荐剂量相比,增加JAK抑制剂剂量(巴瑞替尼4mg对2mg、托法替布10mg对5mg和乌帕替尼30mg对15mg)并不能提供显著的额外益处。在因AE停药方面,除赛妥珠单抗[OR 1.65,95%可信区间(CrI)1.06-2.61]和利妥昔单抗(3.17,1.11-10.80)外,所有活性药物与安慰剂相比均无显著差异。
在csDMARD治疗失败的RA患者中,托珠单抗、赛妥珠单抗和乌帕替尼可能具有相对较好的疗效。服用JAK抑制剂的RA患者可能更倾向于较低的推荐剂量。