Moussa Mohamad K, Lefevre Nicolas, Valentin Eugenie, Meyer Alain, Grimaud Olivier, Bohu Yoan, Gerometta Antoinne, Khiami Frederic, Hardy Alexandre
Department of Sports Surgery, Clinique du Sport, 75005, Paris, France.
J Exp Orthop. 2023 Jul 24;10(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00639-3.
To evaluate the effectiveness of dynamic intermittent compression cryotherapy (DICC) (CryoNov®) with an intravenous nefopam-based pain management protocol (DCIVNPP) in reducing post-operative pain following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) compared to static compression cryotherapy (SCC) (Igloo®) and oral Nefopam.
This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data including 676 patients who underwent primary ACLR in 2022. Patients were either in the DCIVNPP group or in the SCC (control group), and were matched for age, sex, and Lysholm and Tegner scores (338 per arm). The primary outcome was pain on the visual analogue scale (VAS), analyzed in relation to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds for VAS. The secondary outcome was side effects.
Postoperative pain in the DCIVNPP group was less severe on the VAS than in the control group (p < 0.05). The maximum difference in the VAS between groups was 0.57, which is less than the MCID threshold for VAS. The DCIVNPP group crossed the PASS threshold for VAS on Day 3, sooner than the control group. The side effect profiles were similar in both groups except for higher rates of dizziness and malaise in the DCIVNPP group, and higher rates of abdominal pain in the control group. Most of the side effects decreased over time in both groups, with no significant side effects after Day 3.
DCIVNPP effectively allows for faster pain recovery than in the control group. The difference in side effects between the protocols may be due to mode of administration of nefopam.
III.
评估动态间歇性加压冷冻疗法(DICC)(CryoNov®)联合基于奈福泮的静脉疼痛管理方案(DCIVNPP)与静态加压冷冻疗法(SCC)(Igloo®)及口服奈福泮相比,在减轻前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)后疼痛方面的有效性。
这是一项对前瞻性收集数据的回顾性分析,纳入了2022年接受初次ACLR的676例患者。患者分为DCIVNPP组或SCC组(对照组),并根据年龄、性别、Lysholm和Tegner评分进行匹配(每组338例)。主要结局指标是视觉模拟量表(VAS)上的疼痛程度,根据VAS的最小临床重要差异(MCID)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS)阈值进行分析。次要结局指标是副作用。
DCIVNPP组术后VAS疼痛程度低于对照组(p < 0.05)。两组VAS的最大差异为0.57,小于VAS的MCID阈值。DCIVNPP组在第3天达到VAS的PASS阈值,比对照组更早。除DCIVNPP组头晕和不适发生率较高,对照组腹痛发生率较高外,两组副作用情况相似。两组的大多数副作用随时间减少,第3天后无明显副作用。
DCIVNPP比对照组能更有效地实现更快的疼痛恢复。两种方案副作用的差异可能归因于奈福泮的给药方式。
III级