• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

别换台:心理抗拒、透明度与智能恒温器设置更改的用户接受度。

Don't touch that dial: Psychological reactance, transparency, and user acceptance of smart thermostat setting changes.

机构信息

Department of Engineering Management & Systems Engineering, Missouri University of Science & Technology, Rolla, MO, United States of America.

Department of Psychological Science, Missouri University of Science & Technology, Rolla, MO, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jul 24;18(7):e0289017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289017. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0289017
PMID:37486889
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10365304/
Abstract

Automation inherently removes a certain amount of user control. If perceived as a loss of freedom, users may experience psychological reactance, which is a motivational state that can lead a person to engage in behaviors to reassert their freedom. In an online experiment, participants set up and communicated with a hypothetical smart thermostat. Participants read notifications about a change in the thermostat's setting. Phrasing of notifications was altered across three dimensions: strength of authoritative language, deviation of temperature change from preferences, and whether or not the reason for the change was transparent. Authoritative language, temperatures outside the user's preferences, and lack of transparency induced significantly higher levels of reactance. However, when the system presented a temperature change outside of the user's preferences, reactance was mitigated and user acceptance was higher if the thermostat's operations were transparent. Providing justification may be less likely to induce psychological reactance and increase user acceptance. This supports efforts to use behavioral approaches, such as demand response, to increase sustainability and limit the impacts of climate change.

摘要

自动化本质上会减少用户的一些控制权。如果用户认为这是失去自由,他们可能会体验到心理抗拒,这是一种动机状态,可能导致人们采取行为来重申自己的自由。在一项在线实验中,参与者设置并与一个假设的智能恒温器进行了交流。参与者阅读了关于恒温器设置变化的通知。通知的措辞在三个维度上进行了改变:权威性语言的强度、温度变化与偏好的偏离程度,以及改变的原因是否透明。权威性语言、超出用户偏好的温度和缺乏透明度会显著增加抗拒感。然而,当系统呈现出超出用户偏好的温度变化时,如果恒温器的操作是透明的,那么抗拒感会减轻,用户接受度会更高。提供理由不太可能引起心理抗拒,并提高用户接受度。这支持了使用行为方法(如需求响应)来提高可持续性和限制气候变化影响的努力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6230/10365304/602c160ae7be/pone.0289017.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6230/10365304/c250a91afd93/pone.0289017.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6230/10365304/8e76f1ac1c0c/pone.0289017.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6230/10365304/d813fe04fecc/pone.0289017.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6230/10365304/8e7167551697/pone.0289017.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6230/10365304/63e541a364de/pone.0289017.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6230/10365304/a1ced313d5e6/pone.0289017.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6230/10365304/602c160ae7be/pone.0289017.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6230/10365304/c250a91afd93/pone.0289017.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6230/10365304/8e76f1ac1c0c/pone.0289017.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6230/10365304/d813fe04fecc/pone.0289017.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6230/10365304/8e7167551697/pone.0289017.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6230/10365304/63e541a364de/pone.0289017.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6230/10365304/a1ced313d5e6/pone.0289017.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6230/10365304/602c160ae7be/pone.0289017.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Don't touch that dial: Psychological reactance, transparency, and user acceptance of smart thermostat setting changes.别换台:心理抗拒、透明度与智能恒温器设置更改的用户接受度。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 24;18(7):e0289017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289017. eCollection 2023.
2
The Utility of Choice-Enhancing Language in Emergency Preparedness Messages: An Application of Psychological Reactance Theory.选择增强型语言在应急准备信息中的效用:心理抗拒理论的应用。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021 Jun;15(3):282-285. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.11. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
3
Effects of Freedom Restoration, Language Variety, and Issue Type on Psychological Reactance.自由恢复、语言多样性和问题类型对心理抗拒的影响。
Health Commun. 2020 Oct;35(11):1316-1327. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2019.1631565. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
4
Psychological reactance: examination across age, ethnicity, and gender.心理抗拒:跨年龄、种族和性别的考察
Am J Psychol. 2007 Spring;120(1):15-24.
5
Pathways to informed choices: The impact of freedom of choice and two-sided messages on psychological reactance and vaccination intentions among individuals who express concerns.知情选择的途径:选择自由和双面信息对表达担忧的个体的心理抗拒和接种意愿的影响。
Vaccine. 2023 Oct 6;41(42):6272-6280. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.08.016. Epub 2023 Sep 3.
6
Explaining Self and Vicarious Reactance: A Process Model Approach.解释自我及替代性反抗:一种过程模型方法
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Apr;42(4):458-70. doi: 10.1177/0146167216634055.
7
A close examination of trait reactance and issue involvement as moderators of psychological reactance theory.特质反应和问题涉入对心理抗拒理论的调节作用的深入考察。
J Health Commun. 2011 Jul;16(6):660-79. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.551989. Epub 2011 May 24.
8
Freedom as Right or Privilege? Comparing the Effect of Power Distance on Psychological Reactance Between China and the United States.自由是权利还是特权?中关权力距离对心理抗拒影响的比较
Health Commun. 2024 Jun;39(7):1320-1332. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2212138. Epub 2023 May 15.
9
Trust in smart systems: sharing driving goals and giving information to increase trustworthiness and acceptability of smart systems in cars.对智能系统的信任:分享驾驶目标和提供信息,以提高智能系统在汽车中的可信度和可接受性。
Hum Factors. 2012 Oct;54(5):799-810. doi: 10.1177/0018720812443825.
10
Anger Expression Moderates the Effects of Psychological Reactance to Sexual Health Messages.愤怒表达调节了对性健康信息的心理抗拒的影响。
Health Commun. 2017 Dec;32(12):1491-1500. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1230811. Epub 2016 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
The emotional and motivational costs of poorly delivered academic feedback.学术反馈传达不当所带来的情感和动机方面的代价。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 30;16:1585447. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1585447. eCollection 2025.
2
Sustaining Situational Assessment in Electrical Network Power Control.电网功率控制中的持续态势评估
Hum Factors. 2025 Mar;67(3):185-195. doi: 10.1177/00187208241272072. Epub 2024 Aug 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Age-related framing effects: Why vaccination against COVID-19 should be promoted differently in younger and older adults.与年龄相关的框架效应:为何应对年轻人和老年人采取不同方式推广新冠疫苗接种
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2021 Dec;27(4):669-678. doi: 10.1037/xap0000378. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
2
Development and Testing of Psychological Conflict Resolution Strategies for Assertive Robots to Resolve Human-Robot Goal Conflict.用于自主机器人解决人机目标冲突的心理冲突解决策略的开发与测试
Front Robot AI. 2021 Jan 26;7:591448. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2020.591448. eCollection 2020.
3
Effects of Robot Facial Characteristics and Gender in Persuasive Human-Robot Interaction.
机器人面部特征和性别在人机说服性交互中的作用
Front Robot AI. 2018 Jun 21;5:73. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00073. eCollection 2018.
4
Human Performance Benefits of The Automation Transparency Design Principle : Validation and Variation.自动化透明度设计原则对人类绩效的益处:验证与变化
Hum Factors. 2021 May;63(3):379-401. doi: 10.1177/0018720819887252. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
5
Anti-Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Messages Elicit Reactance: Effects on Attitudes and Policy Preferences.反含糖饮料信息引发抵触情绪:对态度和政策偏好的影响。
J Health Commun. 2018;23(8):703-711. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2018.1511012. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
6
Optimizing electricity consumption: A case of function learning.优化电力消耗:一个函数学习的案例。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2015 Dec;21(4):326-41. doi: 10.1037/xap0000056. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
7
Legitimate vs. illegitimate restrictions - a motivational and physiological approach investigating reactance processes.合法限制与非法限制——一种研究反抗过程的动机与生理方法
Front Psychol. 2015 May 18;6:632. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00632. eCollection 2015.
8
Psychometric properties of the Hong psychological reactance scale.香港心理抗拒量表的心理测量特性。
J Pers Assess. 2005 Aug;85(1):74-81. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8501_07.