Suppr超能文献

额部双电极经颅直流电刺激方案可能不会影响联合侧抑制 Go/No-Go 任务的表现。

Frontal two-electrode transcranial direct current stimulation protocols may not affect performance on a combined flanker Go/No-Go task.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Health Centre, University of Szeged, Semmelweis u. 6, Szeged, Hungary.

Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon CRNL U1028 UMR5292, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, INSERM, 95 Boulevard Pinel, 69500, Bron, France.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 24;13(1):11901. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39161-y.

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been tested to modulate cognitive control or response inhibition using various electrode montages. However, electrode montages and current polarities have not been systematically compared when examining tDCS effects on cognitive control and response inhibition. In this randomized, sham-controlled study, 38 healthy volunteers were randomly grouped into receiving one session of sham, anodal, and cathodal each in an electrode montage that targeted either the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or the fronto-medial (FM) region. Participants performed a combined flanker Go/No-Go task during stimulation. No effect of tDCS was found in the DLPFC and FM groups neither using anodal nor cathodal stimulation. No major adverse effects of tDCS were identified using either montage or stimulation type and the two groups did not differ in terms of the reported sensations. The present study suggests that single-session tDCS delivered in two two-electrode montages might not affect cognitive control or response inhibition, despite using widely popular stimulation parameters. This is in line with the heterogeneous findings in the field and calls for further systematic research to exclude less reliable methods from those with more pronounced effects, identify the determinants of responsiveness, and develop optimal ways to utilize this technique.

摘要

经颅直流电刺激 (tDCS) 已被用于通过各种电极配置来调节认知控制或反应抑制。然而,当研究 tDCS 对认知控制和反应抑制的影响时,电极配置和电流极性尚未得到系统比较。在这项随机、假刺激对照研究中,38 名健康志愿者被随机分为三组,分别接受一次假刺激、阳极刺激和阴极刺激,电极配置分别针对背外侧前额叶皮层 (DLPFC) 或额-内侧 (FM) 区域。参与者在刺激期间执行联合侧抑制 Go/No-Go 任务。无论是阳极刺激还是阴极刺激,tDCS 在 DLPFC 和 FM 组中均未产生影响。两种刺激类型和电极配置均未发现 tDCS 的主要不良影响,且两组在报告的感觉方面没有差异。本研究表明,尽管使用了广泛流行的刺激参数,但在两种双电极配置中进行单次 tDCS 可能不会影响认知控制或反应抑制。这与该领域的异质发现一致,并呼吁进一步进行系统研究,排除效果不明显的方法,确定反应性的决定因素,并开发利用该技术的最佳方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e51/10366169/3e7b0aa5dc53/41598_2023_39161_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验