• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本版肿瘤学家信任量表完整版和简版的验证

Validation of the Japanese version of the full and short form Trust in Oncologist Scale.

作者信息

Asai Mariko, Fujimori Maiko, Kamo Yuiko, Hillen Marij A, Oishi Takayuki, Miyashita Mitsunori, Mori Masanori, Morita Tatsuya, Uchitomi Yosuke

机构信息

Division of Survivorship Research, National Cancer Centre Institute for Cancer Control, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Medical Psychology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Palliat Support Care. 2023 Jul 25:1-8. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523000937.

DOI:10.1017/S1478951523000937
PMID:37489279
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to validate the Japanese versions of the Trust in Oncologist Scale (TiOS-J) and the TiOS-Short Form (TiOS-SF-J).

METHODS

A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted among cancer patients in Japan. The forward-backward translation method was used to develop the TiOS-J. The web-based survey was mailed to 633 people, of whom 309 responded. After 2 weeks, 103 among the 156 first-time respondents completed the second survey to verify the reliability of the retest method. The validity was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Spearman's correlation coefficients between the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-Japanese, willingness to recommend the oncologist, trust in health care, and number of oncological consultations. To evaluate reliability, Cronbach's and test-retest correlation were calculated.

RESULTS

The theoretically driven four-factor model and the EFA-driven one-factor model of the full-form TiOS-J (18 items) did not result in an acceptable fit; however, CFA supported the one-dimensionality of the 5 items from the TiOS-SF-J ( (5) = 12.36,  = 0.03, goodness-of-fit index = 0.984, adjusted goodness-of-fit index = 0.952, comparative fit index = 0.991, and root mean square error of approximation = 0.069). With regard to the reliability of TiOS-J and TiOS-SF-J, the Cronbach's alpha values were 0.94 and 0.89, respectively; the test-retest values were 0.82 and 0.78.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

This study indicated that the TiOS-J and TiOS-SF-J are valid and reliable instruments for measuring patients' trust in their oncologists and can be used to assess trust in oncologists for both clinical and research purposes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证日本版肿瘤学家信任量表(TiOS-J)和TiOS简表(TiOS-SF-J)。

方法

在日本癌症患者中开展了一项基于网络的横断面调查。采用前后翻译法开发TiOS-J。通过网络调查向633人发送问卷,其中309人回复。两周后,156名首次回复者中的103人完成了第二次调查,以验证重测法的可靠性。通过探索性因素分析(EFA)、验证性因素分析(CFA)、患者满意度问卷-日本版、推荐肿瘤学家的意愿、对医疗保健的信任以及肿瘤咨询次数之间的斯皮尔曼相关系数来评估效度。为评估信度,计算了克朗巴哈系数和重测相关性。

结果

TiOS-J完整版(18项)的理论驱动四因素模型和EFA驱动单因素模型拟合度均不理想;然而,CFA支持TiOS-SF-J中5个条目的一维性(χ²(5)=12.36,p = 0.03,拟合优度指数 = 0.984,调整后拟合优度指数 = 0.952,比较拟合指数 = 0.991,近似均方根误差 = 0.069)。关于TiOS-J和TiOS-SF-J的信度,克朗巴哈α系数分别为0.94和0.89;重测值分别为0.82和分别为0.78。

结果的意义

本研究表明,TiOS-J和TiOS-SF-J是测量患者对肿瘤学家信任程度的有效且可靠工具,可用于临床和研究目的的肿瘤学家信任评估。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Japanese version of the full and short form Trust in Oncologist Scale.日本版肿瘤学家信任量表完整版和简版的验证
Palliat Support Care. 2023 Jul 25:1-8. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523000937.
2
Validation of the Italian version of the full and abbreviated Trust in Oncologist Scale.验证完整和简化的信任肿瘤学家量表的意大利语版本。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Jan;30(1):e13334. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13334. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
3
Assessing cancer patients' trust in their oncologist: development and validation of the Trust in Oncologist Scale (TiOS).评估癌症患者对肿瘤医生的信任:信任肿瘤医生量表(TiOS)的编制与验证。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Aug;20(8):1787-95. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1276-8. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
4
Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-J) for evaluating oncologist consultations.用于评估肿瘤学家会诊的日本版患者满意度调查问卷(PSQ-J)的有效性和可靠性。
PEC Innov. 2023 May 18;2:100166. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100166. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Development and validation of an abbreviated version of the Trust in Oncologist Scale-the Trust in Oncologist Scale-short form (TiOS-SF).肿瘤学家信任量表简版——肿瘤学家信任量表简式(TiOS-SF)的开发与验证
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Mar;25(3):855-861. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3473-y. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
6
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
7
Validation of the English version of the Trust in Oncologist Scale (TiOS).信度在肿瘤学家量表(TiOS)的英文版本的验证。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Apr;91(1):25-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.004. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
8
The reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Daily Record of Severity of Problems (J-DRSP) and Development of a Short-Form version (J-DRSP (SF)) to assess symptoms of premenstrual syndrome among Japanese women.《日本版问题严重程度每日记录量表》(J-DRSP)的信效度及简版(J-DRSP (SF))的编制:用于评估日本女性经前综合征症状
Biopsychosoc Med. 2021 Mar 18;15(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13030-021-00208-z.
9
Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the career competencies questionnaire for nurses: a cross-sectional study.护士职业能力问卷日文版的心理测量学特性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Sep 27;21(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01035-5.
10
Validity, reliability, and assessment sensitivity of the Japanese version of the short-form McGill pain questionnaire 2 in Japanese patients with neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain.日本版简化麦吉尔疼痛问卷2在日本神经性和非神经性疼痛患者中的效度、信度及评估敏感性
Pain Med. 2014 Nov;15(11):1930-7. doi: 10.1111/pme.12468. Epub 2014 Jun 14.