• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于评估肿瘤学家会诊的日本版患者满意度调查问卷(PSQ-J)的有效性和可靠性。

Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-J) for evaluating oncologist consultations.

作者信息

Kamo Yuiko, Fujimori Maiko, Asai Mariko, Oishi Takayuki, Mori Masanori, Miyashita Mitsunori, Morita Tatsuya, Uchitomi Yosuke

机构信息

Department Division of Supportive Care, Survivorship and Translational Research, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Medical Psychology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

PEC Innov. 2023 May 18;2:100166. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100166. eCollection 2023 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100166
PMID:37384155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10294039/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop the Japanese version of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-J) and examine its validity and reliability.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted among cancer patients in Japan. The PSQ-J was developed following the forward-backward translation method, using a numerical rating scale. Data on patient characteristics and psychometric scales, like the PSQ-J, willingness to recommend an oncologist to others, trust in the healthcare system, uncertainty, and the Physician Compassion Questionnaire were collected. Validity was examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and by calculating the correlations between the total PSQ-J score and the criterion variables. Reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha and test-retest score correlations at a two-week interval.

RESULTS

The first and second surveys were conducted on 309 and 107 patients, respectively. One-dimensionality and model fit were verified using factor analyses. The PSQ-J was significantly associated with other comparable scales. Cronbach's alpha was 0.962; the correlation between the PSQ-J test-retest scores was 0.835 ( < .001).

CONCLUSION

The current study indicates that the PSQ-J can be valid and reliable for assessing satisfaction with oncologist consultation.

INNOVATION

The PSQ-J enables the effective assessment of patient satisfaction with oncologist consultations, leading to better practice reflecting the patient's viewpoint.

摘要

目的

开发患者满意度问卷的日语版本(PSQ-J)并检验其有效性和可靠性。

方法

在日本的癌症患者中进行了一项基于网络的横断面调查。PSQ-J采用前后翻译法开发,使用数字评分量表。收集了患者特征和心理测量量表的数据,如PSQ-J、向他人推荐肿瘤学家的意愿、对医疗系统的信任、不确定性以及医生同情心问卷。通过探索性和验证性因素分析以及计算PSQ-J总分与标准变量之间的相关性来检验有效性。通过Cronbach's alpha和两周间隔的重测分数相关性来确认可靠性。

结果

第一次和第二次调查分别对309名和107名患者进行。使用因素分析验证了单维度性和模型拟合。PSQ-J与其他可比量表显著相关。Cronbach's alpha为0.962;PSQ-J重测分数之间的相关性为0.835(<0.001)。

结论

当前研究表明,PSQ-J在评估对肿瘤学家咨询的满意度方面具有有效性和可靠性。

创新点

PSQ-J能够有效评估患者对肿瘤学家咨询的满意度,从而促使实践更好地反映患者观点。

相似文献

1
Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-J) for evaluating oncologist consultations.用于评估肿瘤学家会诊的日本版患者满意度调查问卷(PSQ-J)的有效性和可靠性。
PEC Innov. 2023 May 18;2:100166. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100166. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Validation of the Japanese version of the full and short form Trust in Oncologist Scale.日本版肿瘤学家信任量表完整版和简版的验证
Palliat Support Care. 2023 Jul 25:1-8. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523000937.
3
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
4
Development of the Persian patient satisfaction questionnaire.波斯语患者满意度调查问卷的编制
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2018 Oct 8;31(8):988-999. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-06-2017-0101.
5
Psychosomatic symptoms questionnaire (PSQ-39): a psychometric study among general population of Iranian adults.心身症状问卷 (PSQ-39):伊朗成年人一般人群中的心理测量学研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 May 25;21(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03278-z.
6
Assessing cancer patients' trust in their oncologist: development and validation of the Trust in Oncologist Scale (TiOS).评估癌症患者对肿瘤医生的信任:信任肿瘤医生量表(TiOS)的编制与验证。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Aug;20(8):1787-95. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1276-8. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
7
Validation of the Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire for Brazilian adult burn patients.巴西成年烧伤患者感知污名化问卷的验证
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 30;13(1):e0190747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190747. eCollection 2018.
8
Validation of a patient satisfaction questionnaire for services provided in Spanish community pharmacies.验证西班牙语社区药店提供的服务的患者满意度问卷。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2011 Dec;33(6):949-57. doi: 10.1007/s11096-011-9566-2. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
9
Validation of the Italian version of the full and abbreviated Trust in Oncologist Scale.验证完整和简化的信任肿瘤学家量表的意大利语版本。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Jan;30(1):e13334. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13334. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
10
The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): development of a Japanese version.女性性功能指数(FSFI):日本版的开发。
J Sex Med. 2011 Aug;8(8):2246-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02267.x. Epub 2011 Apr 14.

本文引用的文献

1
The Association Between Patient Satisfaction and Patient-Reported Health Outcomes.患者满意度与患者报告的健康结果之间的关联。
J Patient Exp. 2019 Sep;6(3):201-209. doi: 10.1177/2374373518795414. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
2
Explicit prognostic disclosure to Asian women with breast cancer: A randomized, scripted video-vignette study (J-SUPPORT1601).明确告知亚洲乳腺癌女性预后信息:一项随机、脚本视频短片研究(J-SUPPORT1601)。
Cancer. 2019 Oct 1;125(19):3320-3329. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32327. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
3
Patient-rated physician empathy and patient satisfaction during pain clinic consultations.患者评估的医师同理心与疼痛诊疗咨询中的患者满意度。
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Nov;188(4):1379-1384. doi: 10.1007/s11845-019-01999-5. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
4
Bifactor analysis confirmation of the factorial structure of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G).癌症治疗功能评估通用版(FACT-G)因子结构的双因素分析验证
Psychooncology. 2019 May;28(5):1149-1152. doi: 10.1002/pon.5062. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
5
Patient satisfaction: Concept analysis in the healthcare context.患者满意度:医疗保健环境下的概念分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Apr;102(4):790-796. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
6
Training for Medical Oncologists on Shared Decision-Making About Palliative Chemotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.对姑息化疗决策共享的医学肿瘤学家进行培训:一项随机对照试验。
Oncologist. 2019 Feb;24(2):259-265. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0090. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
7
Which Physicians' Behaviors on Death Pronouncement Affect Family-Perceived Physician Compassion? A Randomized, Scripted, Video-Vignette Study.哪些医生在宣告死亡时的行为会影响家属感知到的医生的同情心?一项随机、脚本化、视频短片研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Feb;55(2):189-197.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.08.029. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
8
Development and validation of an abbreviated version of the Trust in Oncologist Scale-the Trust in Oncologist Scale-short form (TiOS-SF).肿瘤学家信任量表简版——肿瘤学家信任量表简式(TiOS-SF)的开发与验证
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Mar;25(3):855-861. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3473-y. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
9
Patient Perception of Physician Compassion After a More Optimistic vs a Less Optimistic Message: A Randomized Clinical Trial.患者对医生传递更乐观与不那么乐观信息后的同情心感知:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 May;1(2):176-83. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.297.
10
Randomised controlled trial of a brief intervention targeting predominantly non-verbal communication in general practice consultations.在全科医疗咨询中针对主要非语言沟通的简短干预措施的随机对照试验。
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Jun;65(635):e351-6. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X685237.