Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Department of Population Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Feb;22(2):315-323.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.07.009. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: While renin-angiotensin system inhibition lowers the hepatic venous gradient, the effect on more clinically meaningful endpoints is less studied. We aimed to quantify the relationship between renin-angiotensin system inhibition and liver-related events (LREs) among adults with compensated cirrhosis.
In this national cohort study using the Optum database, we quantified the association between angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) use and LREs (hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, or variceal bleeding) among patients with cirrhosis between 2009 and 2019. Selective beta-blocker (SBB) users served as the comparator group. We used demographic and clinical features to calculate inverse-probability treatment weighting-weighted cumulative incidences, absolute risk differences, and Cox proportional hazard ratios.
Among 4214 adults with cirrhosis, 3155 were ACE inhibitor/ARB users and 1059 were SBB users. In inverse probability treatment weighting-weighted analyses, ACE inhibitor/ARB (vs SBB) users had lower 5-year cumulative incidence (30.6% [95% confidence interval (CI), 27.8% to 33.2%] vs 41.3% [95% CI, 34.0% to 47.7%]; absolute risk difference, -10.7% [95% CI, -18.1% to -3.6%]) and lower risk of LREs (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.80). There was a dose-response relationship: compared with SBB use, ACE inhibitor/ARB prescriptions ≥1 defined daily dose (aHR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.76) were associated with a greater risk reduction compared with <1 defined daily dose (aHR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.07). Results were robust across sensitivity analyses such as comparing ACE inhibitor/ARB users with nonusers and as-treated analysis.
In this national cohort study, ACE inhibitor/ARB use was associated with significantly lower risk of LREs in patients with compensated cirrhosis. These results provide support for a randomized clinical trial to confirm clinical benefit.
虽然肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制作用可降低肝静脉梯度,但对更有临床意义的终点的影响研究较少。本研究旨在定量评估血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)在代偿性肝硬化成人中与肝脏相关事件(LREs)之间的关系。
本项全国性队列研究使用 Optum 数据库,在 2009 年至 2019 年期间,评估了 ACE 抑制剂/ARB 使用者与肝硬化患者 LREs(肝细胞癌、肝移植、腹水、肝性脑病或静脉曲张出血)之间的关系。选择性β受体阻滞剂(SBB)使用者作为对照组。使用人口统计学和临床特征计算逆概率治疗权重加权累积发生率、绝对风险差异和 Cox 比例风险比。
在 4214 例肝硬化成人中,3155 例为 ACE 抑制剂/ARB 使用者,1059 例为 SBB 使用者。在逆概率治疗权重加权分析中,ACE 抑制剂/ARB(与 SBB 相比)使用者的 5 年累积发生率较低(30.6%[95%置信区间(CI),27.8%至 33.2%] vs 41.3%[95% CI,34.0%至 47.7%];绝对风险差异,-10.7%[95% CI,-18.1%至-3.6%]),LREs 风险较低(调整后的危险比[aHR],0.69;95%CI,0.60 至 0.80)。存在剂量反应关系:与 SBB 相比,ACE 抑制剂/ARB 处方≥1 个定义日剂量(aHR,0.65;95%CI,0.56 至 0.76)与较低的风险降低相关,而<1 个定义日剂量(aHR,0.87;95%CI,0.71 至 1.07)。在比较 ACE 抑制剂/ARB 使用者与非使用者的敏感性分析以及治疗分析中,结果均具有稳健性。
在这项全国性队列研究中,ACE 抑制剂/ARB 治疗与代偿性肝硬化患者 LREs 的风险显著降低相关。这些结果为随机临床试验证实临床获益提供了支持。