• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物流行病学的核心概念:指示性混杂和活性对照物的作用。

Core concepts in pharmacoepidemiology: Confounding by indication and the role of active comparators.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022 Mar;31(3):261-269. doi: 10.1002/pds.5407. Epub 2022 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1002/pds.5407
PMID:35019190
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9121653/
Abstract

Confounding by indication poses a significant threat to the validity of nonexperimental studies assessing effectiveness and safety of medical interventions. While no different from other forms of confounding in theory, confounding by indication often requires specific methods to address the bias it creates in addition to common epidemiological adjustment or restriction methods. Clinical indication influencing treatment prescription is patient-specific and complex, making it challenging to measure within nonexperimental research. Restriction of the study population to patients with the indication for treatment would effectively mitigate confounding by indication and bring about comparability between exposure and comparator populations with respect to probability of the exposure. Active comparators are often an effective practical solution to restrict the study population in this manner when indication cannot be measured accurately. This article discusses various forms of confounding by indication, the utility of active comparators for nonexperimental studies of treatment effects, and the active comparator, new user (ACNU) study design to implicitly condition on indication. Considerations for selecting active comparators and conducting an ACNU study design are discussed to enable increased adoption of these methods, improve quality of nonexperimental studies, and ultimately strengthen our evidence base for intended and unintended treatment effects in relevant target populations.

摘要

意向性混杂对评估医疗干预措施的有效性和安全性的非实验性研究的有效性构成了重大威胁。虽然从理论上讲与其他形式的混杂没有区别,但意向性混杂通常需要特定的方法来解决它在除了常见的流行病学调整或限制方法之外所产生的偏差。影响治疗处方的临床指征是特定于患者的且复杂的,这使得在非实验性研究中难以测量。将研究人群限制为具有治疗指征的患者将有效地减轻意向性混杂,并使暴露组和对照组人群在暴露的可能性方面具有可比性。当无法准确测量指征时,主动对照剂通常是一种有效的实用方法,可以通过这种方式限制研究人群。本文讨论了各种形式的意向性混杂,以及主动对照剂在治疗效果的非实验性研究中的效用,以及主动对照剂、新使用者(ACNU)研究设计,以隐含地对指征进行条件处理。讨论了选择主动对照剂和进行 ACNU 研究设计的注意事项,以促进这些方法的更多采用,提高非实验性研究的质量,并最终加强我们在相关目标人群中对预期和非预期治疗效果的证据基础。

相似文献

1
Core concepts in pharmacoepidemiology: Confounding by indication and the role of active comparators.药物流行病学的核心概念:指示性混杂和活性对照物的作用。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022 Mar;31(3):261-269. doi: 10.1002/pds.5407. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
2
Extreme restriction design as a method for reducing confounding by indication in pharmacoepidemiologic research.极端限制设计作为一种在药物流行病学研究中减少混杂偏倚的方法。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Jan;29 Suppl 1:26-34. doi: 10.1002/pds.4708. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
3
Core concepts in pharmacoepidemiology: Key biases arising in pharmacoepidemiologic studies.药物流行病学的核心概念:药物流行病学研究中出现的主要偏倚。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2023 Jan;32(1):9-18. doi: 10.1002/pds.5547. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
4
The Healthy User Effect in Pharmacoepidemiology.药物流行病学中的健康用户效应。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 11. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae358.
5
Confounding and control of confounding in nonexperimental studies of medications in patients with CKD.CKD 患者药物非实验性研究中的混杂因素及混杂因素的控制。
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2012 Jan;19(1):19-26. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2012.01.001.
6
Bias amplification of unobserved confounding in pharmacoepidemiological studies using indication-based sampling.基于适应证抽样的药物流行病学研究中未观察到混杂的偏差放大。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2023 Aug;32(8):886-897. doi: 10.1002/pds.5614. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
7
Propensity scores for confounder adjustment when assessing the effects of medical interventions using nonexperimental study designs.使用非实验性研究设计评估医学干预措施效果时,用于混杂因素调整的倾向评分。
J Intern Med. 2014 Jun;275(6):570-80. doi: 10.1111/joim.12197. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
The Use of Active Comparators in Self-Controlled Designs.自我对照设计中活性对照剂的使用
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Oct 1;190(10):2181-2187. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab110.
10
The importance and implications of comparator selection in pharmacoepidemiologic research.药物流行病学研究中对照选择的重要性及影响
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2018 Sep;5(3):272-283. doi: 10.1007/s40471-018-0155-y. Epub 2018 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Super effect or methodological flaw: questioning the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist cancer narrative.超级效应还是方法学缺陷:质疑胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂与癌症的关系
Diabetologia. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1007/s00125-025-06538-9.
2
Literature analysis and implication of biologic therapy for children with non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis in real-world settings.现实环境中生物疗法对非系统性幼年特发性关节炎患儿的文献分析及意义
Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2025 Aug 31;14(3):162-174. doi: 10.5582/irdr.2025.01035.
3
Impact of postoperative fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography on adjuvant head and neck cancer treatment.术后氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描对辅助性头颈癌治疗的影响
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2025 Jul 1;9(4). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaf077.
4
First-Trimester Antibiotic Use for Urinary Tract Infection and Risk of Congenital Malformations.孕早期使用抗生素治疗尿路感染与先天性畸形风险
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2519544. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.19544.
5
Association between hypoglycaemic drug de-intensification, mortality and hospital admission in older adults with type 2 diabetes: a cohort study emulating a target trial.老年2型糖尿病患者降糖药物强化治疗与死亡率及住院率之间的关联:一项模拟目标试验的队列研究
Age Ageing. 2025 May 31;54(6). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf160.
6
Large-scale Empirical Identification of Candidate Comparators for Pharmacoepidemiological Studies.药物流行病学研究候选对照的大规模实证识别
Drug Saf. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1007/s40264-025-01569-y.
7
Timing of progesterone treatment to prevent preterm birth in pregnancies with a short cervix: A population-based historical cohort study.孕激素治疗预防宫颈短的妊娠早产的时机:一项基于人群的历史性队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Aug;104(8):1443-1451. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15147. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
8
Continuous-Time Causal Inference With Marked Point Process Weights: An Example on Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporters 2 Inhibitor Medications and Urinary Tract Infection.具有标记点过程权重的连续时间因果推断:以钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂药物与尿路感染为例
Stat Med. 2025 May;44(10-12):e70102. doi: 10.1002/sim.70102.
9
Comparative Outcomes of Transabdominal and Transperineal Approaches for Full-Thickness Rectal Prolapse Repair: A Fourteen-Year Retrospective Study.经腹与经会阴入路全层直肠脱垂修复术的比较结果:一项十四年回顾性研究
Gastroenterology Res. 2025 Apr;18(2):85-92. doi: 10.14740/gr2015. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
10
A Genetics-guided Integrative Framework for Drug Repurposing: Identifying Anti-hypertensive Drug Telmisartan for Type 2 Diabetes.一种用于药物再利用的遗传学引导综合框架:确定替米沙坦为2型糖尿病的抗高血压药物。
medRxiv. 2025 Mar 23:2025.03.22.25324223. doi: 10.1101/2025.03.22.25324223.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of alternative approaches to trim subjects in the tails of the propensity score distribution.比较倾向评分分布尾部中修剪受试者的替代方法。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Oct;28(10):1290-1298. doi: 10.1002/pds.4846. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
2
Restriction of Pharmacoepidemiologic Cohorts to Initiators of Medications in Unrelated Preventive Drug Classes to Reduce Confounding by Frailty in Older Adults.限制药物流行病学队列仅限于非相关预防药物类别的药物启动者,以减少老年人因体弱而产生的混杂。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 1;188(7):1371-1382. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz083.
3
The importance and implications of comparator selection in pharmacoepidemiologic research.药物流行病学研究中对照选择的重要性及影响
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2018 Sep;5(3):272-283. doi: 10.1007/s40471-018-0155-y. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
4
Nordic registry-based cohort studies: Possibilities and pitfalls when combining Nordic registry data.基于北欧注册库的队列研究:整合北欧注册库数据时的机遇与陷阱
Scand J Public Health. 2017 Jul;45(17_suppl):14-19. doi: 10.1177/1403494817702336.
5
Confounding by Indication in Clinical Research.临床研究中的指征性混杂
JAMA. 2016 Nov 1;316(17):1818-1819. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.16435.
6
Using Big Data to Emulate a Target Trial When a Randomized Trial Is Not Available.在没有随机试验时使用大数据模拟目标试验。
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr 15;183(8):758-64. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv254. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
7
The active comparator, new user study design in pharmacoepidemiology: historical foundations and contemporary application.药物流行病学中的活性对照、新用户研究设计:历史基础与当代应用。
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2015 Dec;2(4):221-228. doi: 10.1007/s40471-015-0053-5. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
8
Active-comparator design and new-user design in observational studies.观察性研究中的主动比较器设计和新用户设计。
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015 Jul;11(7):437-41. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.30. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
9
Propensity scores for confounder adjustment when assessing the effects of medical interventions using nonexperimental study designs.使用非实验性研究设计评估医学干预措施效果时,用于混杂因素调整的倾向评分。
J Intern Med. 2014 Jun;275(6):570-80. doi: 10.1111/joim.12197. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
10
Cancer incidence among those initiating insulin therapy with glargine versus human NPH insulin.起始甘精胰岛素与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素治疗人群中的癌症发病率。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Nov;36(11):3517-25. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0263. Epub 2013 Jul 22.