Fail Stefanie, Schober Michael F, Conrad Frederick G
Department of Psychology, New School for Social Research, New York, USA.
Nuance Communications, Inc., New York, USA.
Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2021;24(2):249-364. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2020.1824629. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
To explore socially desirable responding in telephone surveys, this study examines response latencies in answers to 27 questions in 319 audio-recorded iPhone interviews from Schober et al. (2015). Response latencies were compared when respondents (a) answered questions on sensitive vs. nonsensitive topics (as classified by online raters); (b) produced more vs. less socially desirable answers; and (c) were interviewed by a professional interviewer or an automated system. Respondents answered questions on sensitive topics more quickly than on nonsensitive topics, though patterns varied by question format (categorical, numerical, ordinal). Independent of question sensitivity, respondents gave less socially desirable answers more quickly when answering categorical and ordinal questions but more slowly when answering numeric questions. Respondents were particularly quicker to answer sensitive questions when asked by interviewers than by the automated system. Findings demonstrate that response times can be (differently) revealing about question and response sensitivity in a telephone survey.
为了探究电话调查中社会期望性回应,本研究考察了来自肖伯等人(2015年)的319次iPhone录音访谈中对27个问题的回答延迟情况。比较了受访者在以下情况下的回答延迟:(a)回答敏感话题与非敏感话题的问题(由在线评分者分类);(b)给出社会期望性较高与较低的回答;(c)由专业访谈员或自动系统进行访谈。受访者回答敏感话题的问题比回答非敏感话题的问题更快,不过模式因问题格式(分类、数字、序数)而异。与问题敏感性无关,受访者在回答分类和序数问题时,给出社会期望性较低的回答更快,但在回答数字问题时则更慢。当由访谈员提问时,受访者回答敏感问题的速度尤其比由自动系统提问时更快。研究结果表明,在电话调查中,回答时间对于问题和回答的敏感性可能有(不同的)揭示作用。