• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

0.5%和0.75%布比卡因用于肢体手术的硬膜外麻醉

[Bupivacaine 0.5% and 0.75% for peridural anesthesia in operations on the extremities].

作者信息

Bischoff U, Nolte H

出版信息

Reg Anaesth. 1986 Jul;9(3):60-3.

PMID:3749544
Abstract

The safety of bupivacaine in respect of its cardiotoxicity has been discussed recently. Especially the concentration of bupivacaine 0.75% has been heavily criticized, first of all in obstetrical anaesthesia. Therefore two groups of patients receiving bupivacaine 0.5% and bupivacaine 0.75% were compared according to complications and side effects related to the local anaesthetic. 749 patients undergoing varicose vein stripping were divided in two groups: 371 patients received bupivacaine 0.5% with adrenalin 1:200,000 and 378 patients bupivacaine 0.75% with POR-8 (0.1 i.U./ml) for epidural anaesthesia. The average age was 46 years (20-71 y.). The average height 168 cm (149-196 cm), and the average weight 72 kg (40-99 kg). There were 68.7% female and 31.3% male patients in these groups. The anaesthesia charts of these patients were evaluated retrospectively. The incidence of hypotension, breadycardia, tachycardia, extrasystoles, vomiting and muscle twirching were taken as side effects. The two groups were compared. The results showed in relation to age, risk-grouping and the dosage/kg no evidence of an increased cardiotoxicity of the higher concentration of bupivacaine. Thus bupivacaine 0.75% does not show any increase in complications or side effects as long as its application is done correctly.

摘要

最近讨论了布比卡因在心脏毒性方面的安全性。尤其是0.75%的布比卡因浓度受到了严厉批评,首先是在产科麻醉中。因此,根据与局部麻醉剂相关的并发症和副作用,对两组接受0.5%布比卡因和0.75%布比卡因的患者进行了比较。749例接受大隐静脉剥脱术的患者被分为两组:371例患者接受含1:200,000肾上腺素的0.5%布比卡因,378例患者接受含POR - 8(0.1国际单位/毫升)的0.75%布比卡因用于硬膜外麻醉。平均年龄为46岁(20 - 71岁)。平均身高168厘米(149 - 196厘米),平均体重72千克(40 - 99千克)。这些组中女性患者占68.7%,男性患者占31.3%。对这些患者的麻醉记录进行了回顾性评估。将低血压、心动过缓、心动过速、早搏、呕吐和肌肉抽搐的发生率作为副作用。对两组进行了比较。结果显示,就年龄、风险分组和每千克剂量而言,没有证据表明较高浓度的布比卡因会增加心脏毒性。因此,只要正确使用,0.75%的布比卡因在并发症或副作用方面没有任何增加。

相似文献

1
[Bupivacaine 0.5% and 0.75% for peridural anesthesia in operations on the extremities].0.5%和0.75%布比卡因用于肢体手术的硬膜外麻醉
Reg Anaesth. 1986 Jul;9(3):60-3.
2
[Peridural anesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine-fentanyl. Evaluation of the pre-heating effect].[0.5%布比卡因-芬太尼硬膜外麻醉。预热效果评估]
Minerva Anestesiol. 1992 Jul-Aug;58(7-8):433-6.
3
[The question of equal potency of etidocaine and bupivacaine in peridural anesthesia].[依替卡因与布比卡因在硬膜外麻醉中效能相等的问题]
Reg Anaesth. 1984 Apr;7(2):33-8.
4
A randomized comparison of low doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery.低剂量高压布比卡因用于剖宫产腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉的随机对照研究。
Anesth Analg. 2009 Nov;109(5):1600-5. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b72d35.
5
Clinic experience of peridual administration with 0.975% bupivacaine.0.975%布比卡因硬膜外给药的临床经验
Int Surg. 1990 Apr-Jun;75(2):127-30.
6
[Bupivacaine for peridural anesthesia in cesarean section].
Reg Anaesth. 1986 Jul;9(3):64-7.
7
[The problem of the cardiotoxicity of bupivacaine 0.75%].[0.75%布比卡因的心脏毒性问题]
Reg Anaesth. 1986 Jul;9(3):57-9.
8
[Modification of oxygen consumption following major abdominal surgery by epidural anesthesia].[硬膜外麻醉对腹部大手术后氧耗的影响]
Anaesthesist. 1993 Sep;42(9):612-8.
9
Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: dose-dependent effects of hyperbaric bupivacaine on maternal hemodynamics.剖宫产联合腰麻-硬膜外麻醉:重比重布比卡因对产妇血流动力学的剂量依赖性效应。
Anesth Analg. 2006 Jul;103(1):187-90, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000220877.70380.6e.
10
Combination of low doses of intrathecal ketamine and midazolam with bupivacaine improves postoperative analgesia in orthopaedic surgery.鞘内注射低剂量氯胺酮、咪达唑仑与布比卡因联合使用可改善骨科手术术后镇痛效果。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Apr;25(4):299-306. doi: 10.1017/S0265021507002645. Epub 2007 Sep 25.