Mehrpour Omid, Saeedi Farhad, Abdollahi Jafar, Amirabadizadeh Alireza, Goss Foster
Michigan Poison & Drug Information Center, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, United States.
Rocky Mountain Poison and Drug Safety, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO, United States.
J Res Med Sci. 2023 Jun 12;28:49. doi: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_602_22. eCollection 2023.
Diphenhydramine (DPH) is an antihistamine medication that in overdose can result in anticholinergic symptoms and serious complications, including arrhythmia and coma. We aimed to compare the value of various machine learning (ML) models, including light gradient boosting machine (LGBM), logistic regression (LR), and random forest (RF), in the outcome prediction of DPH poisoning.
We used the National Poison Data System database and included all of the human exposures of DPH from January 01, 2017 to December 31, 2017, and excluded those cases with missing information, duplicated cases, and those who reported co-ingestion. Data were split into training and test datasets, and three ML models were compared. We developed confusion matrices for each, and standard performance metrics were calculated.
Our study population included 53,761 patients with DPH exposure. The most common reasons for exposure, outcome, chronicity of exposure, and formulation were captured. Our results showed that the average precision-recall area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84. LGBM and RF had the highest performance (average AUC of 0.91), followed by LR (average AUC of 0.90). The specificity of the models was 87.0% in the testing groups. The precision of models was 75.0%. Recall (sensitivity) of models ranged between 73% and 75% with an F1 score of 75.0%. The overall accuracy of LGBM, LR, and RF models in the test dataset was 74.8%, 74.0%, and 75.1%, respectively. In total, just 1.1% of patients (mostly those with major outcomes) received physostigmine.
Our study demonstrates the application of ML in the prediction of DPH poisoning.
苯海拉明(DPH)是一种抗组胺药物,过量服用可导致抗胆碱能症状和严重并发症,包括心律失常和昏迷。我们旨在比较各种机器学习(ML)模型,包括轻梯度提升机(LGBM)、逻辑回归(LR)和随机森林(RF),在DPH中毒结局预测中的价值。
我们使用了国家中毒数据系统数据库,纳入了2017年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间所有DPH人体暴露病例,并排除了信息缺失、重复病例以及报告同时摄入其他物质的病例。数据被分为训练集和测试集,并对三种ML模型进行了比较。我们为每个模型生成了混淆矩阵,并计算了标准性能指标。
我们的研究人群包括53761例DPH暴露患者。记录了最常见的暴露原因、结局、暴露慢性程度和制剂类型。我们的结果显示,平均精确召回曲线下面积(AUC)为0.84。LGBM和RF表现最佳(平均AUC为0.91),其次是LR(平均AUC为0.90)。测试组中模型的特异性为87.0%。模型的精确率为75.0%。模型的召回率(敏感性)在73%至75%之间,F1分数为75.0%。LGBM、LR和RF模型在测试数据集中的总体准确率分别为74.8%、74.0%和75.1%。总共只有1.1%的患者(大多数是有严重结局的患者)接受了毒扁豆碱治疗。
我们的研究证明了ML在DPH中毒预测中的应用。