• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习的体外受精孕妇活产预测模型的构建。

Construction of the machine learning-based live birth prediction models for the first in vitro fertilization pregnant women.

机构信息

Reproductive Medicine Center, Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, Huizhou, 516001, P.R. China.

Obstetrics and Gynecology, Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, Xiapu Branch, No. 8 Hengjiang 4Th Road, Huizhou, 516001, P.R. China.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jun 27;23(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05775-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-023-05775-3
PMID:37370040
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10294395/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was to conduct prediction models based on parameters before and after the first cycle, respectively, to predict live births in women who received fresh or frozen in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for the first time.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study population consisted of 1,857 women undergoing the IVF cycle from 2019 to 2021 at Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital. The data between 2019 and 2020 were completely randomly divided into a training set and a validation set (8:2). The data from 2021 was used as the testing set, and the bootstrap validation was carried out by extracting 30% of the data for 200 times on the total data set. In the training set, variables are divided into those before the first cycle and after the first cycle. Then, predictive factors before the first cycle and after the first cycle were screened. Based on the predictive factors, four supervised machine learning algorithms were respectively considered to build the predictive models: logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and light gradient boosting machine (LGBM). The performances of the prediction models were evaluated by the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy.

RESULTS

Totally, 851 women (45.83%) had a live birth. The LGBM model showed a robust performance in predicting live birth before the first cycle, with AUC being 0.678 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.651 to 0.706] in the training set, 0.612 (95% CI: 0.553 to 0.670) in the validation set, 0.634 (95% CI: 0.511 to 0.758) in the testing set, and 0.670 (95% CI: 0.626 to 0.715) in the bootstrap validation. The AUC value in the training set, validation set, testing set, and bootstrap of LGBM to predict live birth after the first cycle was 0.841 (95% CI: 0.821 to 0.861), 0.816 (95% CI: 0.773 to 0.859), 0.835 (95% CI: 0.743 to 0.926), and 0.839 (95% CI: 0.806 to 0.871), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The LGBM model based on the predictive factors before and after the first cycle for live birth in women showed a good predictive performance. Therefore, it may assist fertility specialists and patients to adjust the appropriate treatment strategy.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在分别基于新鲜或冷冻体外受精(IVF)或胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)的第一次周期前后的参数建立预测模型,以预测首次接受 IVF 或 ICSI 的女性的活产。

方法

本回顾性队列研究人群包括 2019 年至 2021 年在惠州市中心医院接受 IVF 周期的 1857 名女性。2019 年至 2020 年的数据完全随机分为训练集和验证集(8:2)。2021 年的数据被用作测试集,并通过在总数据集上提取 30%的数据进行 200 次 bootstrap 验证。在训练集中,变量分为第一周期前和第一周期后。然后,筛选第一周期前和第一周期后的预测因素。基于预测因素,分别考虑四种监督机器学习算法:逻辑回归(LR)、随机森林(RF)、极端梯度提升(XGBoost)和轻梯度提升机(LGBM)来构建预测模型。通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性来评估预测模型的性能。

结果

共有 851 名女性(45.83%)活产。LGBM 模型在预测第一周期前的活产方面表现出稳健的性能,在训练集的 AUC 为 0.678[95%置信区间(CI):0.651-0.706],验证集的 AUC 为 0.612(95%CI:0.553-0.670),测试集的 AUC 为 0.634(95%CI:0.511-0.758),bootstrap 验证集的 AUC 为 0.670(95%CI:0.626-0.715)。LGBM 预测第一周期后活产的训练集、验证集、测试集和 bootstrap 的 AUC 值分别为 0.841(95%CI:0.821-0.861)、0.816(95%CI:0.773-0.859)、0.835(95%CI:0.743-0.926)和 0.839(95%CI:0.806-0.871)。

结论

基于第一周期前后预测因素的 LGBM 模型对女性活产的预测表现出良好的预测性能。因此,它可能有助于生育专家和患者调整适当的治疗策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726e/10294395/593d0c5d4b4b/12884_2023_5775_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726e/10294395/5e90ce263c91/12884_2023_5775_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726e/10294395/5668acb3e6df/12884_2023_5775_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726e/10294395/593d0c5d4b4b/12884_2023_5775_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726e/10294395/5e90ce263c91/12884_2023_5775_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726e/10294395/5668acb3e6df/12884_2023_5775_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726e/10294395/593d0c5d4b4b/12884_2023_5775_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Construction of the machine learning-based live birth prediction models for the first in vitro fertilization pregnant women.基于机器学习的体外受精孕妇活产预测模型的构建。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jun 27;23(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05775-3.
2
Personalized prediction of live birth prior to the first in vitro fertilization treatment: a machine learning method.在首次体外受精治疗前预测活产:一种机器学习方法。
J Transl Med. 2019 Sep 23;17(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-2062-5.
3
Which factors are most predictive for live birth after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatments? Analysis of 100 prospectively recorded variables in 8,400 IVF/ICSI single-embryo transfers.在体外受精和卵胞浆内单精子注射(IVF/ICSI)治疗后,哪些因素对活产的预测性最强?对8400例IVF/ICSI单胚胎移植中100个前瞻性记录变量的分析。
Fertil Steril. 2017 Mar;107(3):641-648.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.005. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
4
The vaginal microbiome as a predictor for outcome of in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective study.阴道微生物组作为体外受精(无论是否进行胞浆内单精子注射)结局的预测因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Jun 4;34(6):1042-1054. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez065.
5
Establishment and validation of a heart failure risk prediction model for elderly patients after coronary rotational atherectomy based on machine learning.基于机器学习的老年患者冠状动脉旋磨术后心力衰竭风险预测模型的建立与验证
PeerJ. 2024 Jan 31;12:e16867. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16867. eCollection 2024.
6
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
7
Live-Birth Prediction of Natural-Cycle Fertilization Using 57,558 Linked Cycle Records: A Machine Learning Perspective.利用 57558 个关联周期记录进行自然周期受精的活产预测:机器学习视角。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 22;13:838087. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.838087. eCollection 2022.
8
Prediction of Neurological Outcomes in Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Survivors Immediately after Return of Spontaneous Circulation: Ensemble Technique with Four Machine Learning Models.院外心脏骤停幸存者自主循环恢复后即刻的神经功能结局预测:四种机器学习模型的集成技术。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Jul 19;36(28):e187. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e187.
9
A Bayesian network model for prediction of low or failed fertilization in assisted reproductive technology based on a large clinical real-world data.基于大型临床真实世界数据的辅助生殖技术中低受精或受精失败预测的贝叶斯网络模型。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023 Jan 26;21(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12958-023-01065-x.
10
ICSI does not increase the cumulative live birth rate in non-male factor infertility.ICSI 并不会增加非男性因素不孕的累积活产率。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Jul 1;33(7):1322-1330. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey118.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive model for live birth outcomes in single euploid frozen embryo transfers: a comparative analysis of logistic regression and machine learning approaches.单倍体冷冻胚胎移植活产结局的预测模型:逻辑回归与机器学习方法的比较分析
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 May 22. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03524-3.
2
Machine learning center-specific models show improved IVF live birth predictions over US national registry-based model.机器学习特定中心模型在预测体外受精活产方面比基于美国国家登记处的模型表现更优。
Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 17;16(1):3661. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58744-z.
3
FertilitY Predictor-a machine learning-based web tool for the prediction of assisted reproduction outcomes in men with Y chromosome microdeletions.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of a live birth prediction model for expected poor ovarian response patients during IVF/ICSI.开发和验证 IVF/ICSI 中预期卵巢反应不良患者活产预测模型。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 31;14:1027805. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1027805. eCollection 2023.
2
Fertility With Early Reduction of Ovarian Reserve.卵巢储备功能早期下降时的生育力
Cureus. 2022 Oct 15;14(10):e30326. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30326. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Impact of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in women with non-male factor infertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
生育力预测器——一种基于机器学习的网络工具,用于预测Y染色体微缺失男性的辅助生殖结局。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Feb;42(2):473-481. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03338-9. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
4
Patient-Centric In Vitro Fertilization Prognostic Counseling Using Machine Learning for the Pragmatist.基于机器学习的以患者为中心的体外受精预后咨询:实用主义者视角。
Semin Reprod Med. 2024 Jun;42(2):112-129. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791536. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
5
Identifying key predictive features for live birth rate in advanced maternal age patients undergoing single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer.识别高龄患者行玻璃化冷冻解冻囊胚移植后活产率的关键预测特征。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 Oct 7;22(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01295-7.
6
Enhancing predictive models for egg donation: time to blastocyst hatching and machine learning insights.提高卵母细胞捐赠预测模型:囊胚孵出时间和机器学习的见解。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 Sep 11;22(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01285-9.
7
Improving IVF Utilization with Patient-Centric Artificial Intelligence-Machine Learning (AI/ML): A Retrospective Multicenter Experience.以患者为中心的人工智能-机器学习(AI/ML)提高试管婴儿(IVF)利用率:一项回顾性多中心经验。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 18;13(12):3560. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123560.
8
Development of a machine learning-based prediction model for clinical pregnancy of intrauterine insemination in a large Chinese population.基于机器学习的中国大样本人群宫腔内人工授精临床妊娠预测模型的建立。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Aug;41(8):2173-2183. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03153-2. Epub 2024 May 31.
胞浆内单精子注射对非男性因素不孕女性的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Reprod Health. 2022 Oct 28;4:1029381. doi: 10.3389/frph.2022.1029381. eCollection 2022.
4
Natural cycle increases the live-birth rate compared with hormone replacement treatment for frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer.自然周期较激素替代治疗提高冻融单囊胚移植活产率。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 28;13:969379. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.969379. eCollection 2022.
5
Applying an Improved Stacking Ensemble Model to Predict the Mortality of ICU Patients with Heart Failure.应用改进的堆叠集成模型预测重症监护病房心力衰竭患者的死亡率。
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 31;11(21):6460. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216460.
6
Predicting IVF outcome in poor ovarian responders.预测卵巢反应不良患者的 IVF 结局。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Sep 30;22(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01964-y.
7
Predicting the probability of a live birth after a freeze-all based in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatment strategy.基于全胚胎冷冻体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)治疗策略预测活产概率。
Transl Pediatr. 2022 Jun;11(6):797-812. doi: 10.21037/tp-21-589.
8
The Framing of machine learning risk prediction models illustrated by evaluation of sepsis in general wards.通过普通病房中脓毒症的评估阐述机器学习风险预测模型的构建。
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Nov 15;4(1):158. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00529-x.
9
Factors associated with livebirth in couples undergoing their first in vitro fertilization cycle: An internally validated prediction model.首次接受体外受精周期的夫妇中与活产相关的因素:一个内部验证的预测模型。
Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep 27;18(3):212-220. doi: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.71770.
10
Serum estradiol level on the day of trigger as a predictor of number of metaphase II oocytes from IVF antagonist cycles and subsequent impact on pregnancy rates.触发日血清雌二醇水平预测 IVF 拮抗剂周期的中 II 期卵母细胞数及其对妊娠率的后续影响。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2021 Jul 21;25(3):447-452. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210007.