Division of Nephrology, Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis, 660 S Euclid Avenue, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
CEN Case Rep. 2024 Apr;13(2):125-127. doi: 10.1007/s13730-023-00812-8. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
Dialysis reactions are not uncommon in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients who are undergoing in-center hemodialysis. Here we report the first case of anaphylaxis related to citric acid solutions used for dialysis machine disinfection and descaling. The patient developed repeated episodes of anaphylactic reactions during hemodialysis only in the inpatient setting leading to respiratory failure needing intubation and anaphylactic shock. This had failed to resolve despite using various combinations of different dialysis machines and dialyzer membranes and only resolved after the elimination of citric acid from the dialysis circuit. This case highlights the importance of different allergens in dialysis circuits and emphasizes the importance of looking for alternative reasons for dialyzer reactions.
透析反应在接受中心血液透析的终末期肾病 (ESRD) 患者中并不罕见。在这里,我们报告了首例与柠檬酸溶液相关的过敏反应的病例,该溶液用于透析机的消毒和除垢。该患者在住院期间仅在血液透析期间反复出现过敏反应,导致呼吸衰竭需要插管和过敏性休克。尽管使用了不同透析机和透析器膜的各种组合,但仍未解决过敏反应,只有在从透析回路中消除柠檬酸后才得到解决。该病例强调了透析回路中不同过敏原的重要性,并强调了寻找透析器反应替代原因的重要性。