• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Communication about colorectal cancer screening in Britain: public preferences for an expert recommendation.英国结直肠癌筛查的沟通:公众对专家建议的偏好。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Dec 4;107(12):1938-43. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.512. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
2
Ethnic minority women prefer strong recommendations to be screened for cancer.少数民族女性更倾向于接受关于癌症筛查的强烈建议。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Feb 3;17(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4093-2.
3
Effects of Promotional Materials on Attitudes and Fear towards Colorectal Cancer Screening among Chinese Older Adults: An Experimental Study.宣传材料对中国老年人结直肠癌筛查态度及恐惧的影响:一项实验研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jul 13;14(7):769. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070769.
4
Patient preferences on general health and colorectal cancer screening decision-making: Results from a national survey.患者对一般健康和结直肠癌筛查决策的偏好:来自全国性调查的结果。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Apr;105(4):1034-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.033. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
5
Community-based preferences for stool cards versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.社区对结直肠癌筛查中粪便检测卡与结肠镜检查的偏好
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Feb;23(2):169-74. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0480-1. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
6
Colorectal cancer screening mode preferences among US veterans.美国退伍军人对结直肠癌筛查模式的偏好。
Prev Med. 2009 Nov;49(5):442-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.09.002. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
7
Decision-making on colorectal cancer screening in Curaçao - interviews with the target population.库拉索岛结直肠癌筛查决策——目标人群访谈。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 27;23(1):1437. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16335-x.
8
Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and practices preferences for decision making.结直肠癌筛查态度及决策制定的实践偏好
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Jun;28(5):439-46. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.02.006.
9
What influences the decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy?影响人们决定参与粪便潜血试验和乙状结肠镜检查进行结直肠癌筛查的因素有哪些?
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Jul;49(10):2321-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
10
Preferences for colorectal cancer screening techniques and intention to attend: a multi-criteria decision analysis.结直肠癌筛查技术的偏好与参与意愿:多标准决策分析
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Oct;11(5):499-507. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0051-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Attitudes towards being offered a choice of self-sampling or clinician sampling for cervical screening: A cross-sectional survey of women taking part in a clinical validation of HPV self-collection devices.对宫颈筛查中提供自我采样或临床医生采样选择的态度:对参与HPV自我采集设备临床验证的女性的横断面调查。
J Med Screen. 2025 Jun;32(2):93-99. doi: 10.1177/09691413241283356. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
2
Association between Recommendations from Public Health Nurses, Medical Professionals, and Family Members and Participation in Health Checkups among Middle-aged Community Residents with National Health Insurance.公共卫生护士、医学专业人员和家庭成员的建议与参加国民健康保险的中年社区居民健康检查之间的关联。
JMA J. 2022 Apr 15;5(2):199-206. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2021-0225. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
3
Barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in Asia.亚洲结直肠癌筛查的障碍与促进因素
Ecancermedicalscience. 2021 Sep 13;15:1285. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1285. eCollection 2021.
4
Autonomous and informed decision-making: The case of colorectal cancer screening.自主和知情决策:以结直肠癌筛查为例。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233308. eCollection 2020.
5
Using Nudges to Enhance Clinicians' Implementation of Shared Decision Making With Patient Decision Aids.运用助推手段促进临床医生借助患者决策辅助工具实施共同决策。
MDM Policy Pract. 2020 Apr 26;5(1):2381468320915906. doi: 10.1177/2381468320915906. eCollection 2020 Jan-Jun.
6
Defining the information needs of lung cancer screening participants: a qualitative study.定义肺癌筛查参与者的信息需求:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2019 Nov 24;6(1):e000448. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000448. eCollection 2019.
7
Impact of a Lung Cancer Screening Information Film on Informed Decision-making: A Randomized Trial.肺癌筛查信息片对知情决策的影响:一项随机试验。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Jun;16(6):744-751. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201811-841OC.
8
Fit for Cancer Treatment: a prospective feasibility study of primary care initiated prehabilitation for patients with suspected cancer.
BJGP Open. 2018 Oct 17;2(4):bjgpopen18X101608. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101608. eCollection 2018 Dec.
9
Eliciting vulnerable patients' preferences regarding colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.了解脆弱患者对结直肠癌筛查的偏好:一项系统综述
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Oct 31;12:2267-2282. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S156552. eCollection 2018.
10
Development of an evidence-based brief 'talking' intervention for non-responders to bowel screening for use in primary care: stakeholder interviews.为初级保健中肠道筛查无反应者开发基于证据的简短“谈话式”干预措施:利益相关者访谈
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jun 30;19(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0794-6.

本文引用的文献

1
To nudge or not to nudge: cancer screening programmes and the limits of libertarian paternalism.推动还是不推动:癌症筛查计划和自由意志家长主义的局限。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Dec;66(12):1193-6. doi: 10.1136/jech-2012-201194. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
2
Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years: a comparative modeling study of risk.倾向于支持从 40 岁开始进行筛查性乳房 X 光检查,以评估获益与危害的平衡:风险的比较建模研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 1;156(9):609-17. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-9-201205010-00002.
3
Informed choice in bowel cancer screening: a qualitative study to explore how adults with lower education use decision aids.肠癌筛查中的知情选择:一项定性研究,旨在探索受教育程度较低的成年人如何使用决策辅助工具。
Health Expect. 2014 Aug;17(4):511-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00780.x. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
4
Cancer screening - United States, 2010.癌症筛查 - 美国,2010 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012 Jan 27;61(3):41-5.
5
An independent review is under way.正在进行独立审查。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 25;343:d6843. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6843.
6
Screening for prostate cancer: the current evidence and guidelines controversy.前列腺癌筛查:当前证据与指南争议
Can J Urol. 2011 Oct;18(5):5875-83.
7
Cancer fatalism: deterring early presentation and increasing social inequalities?癌症宿命论:阻碍早期就诊并加剧社会不平等?
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Oct;20(10):2127-31. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0437. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
8
Effect of evidence based risk information on "informed choice" in colorectal cancer screening: randomised controlled trial.基于证据的风险信息对结直肠癌筛查中“知情选择”的影响:随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2011 Jun 2;342:d3193. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d3193.
9
Does information about risks and benefits improve the decision-making process in cancer screening - randomized study.风险与获益信息能否改善癌症筛查决策——随机研究
Cancer Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;35(6):574-9. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2011.04.004. Epub 2011 May 31.
10
Applying strategies from libertarian paternalism to decision making for prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening.将自由意志家长主义策略应用于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查决策。
BMC Cancer. 2011 Apr 21;11:148. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-148.

英国结直肠癌筛查的沟通:公众对专家建议的偏好。

Communication about colorectal cancer screening in Britain: public preferences for an expert recommendation.

机构信息

Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2012 Dec 4;107(12):1938-43. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.512. Epub 2012 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1038/bjc.2012.512
PMID:23175148
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3516693/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Informed decision-making approaches to cancer screening emphasise the importance of decisions being determined by individuals' own values and preferences. However, advice from a trusted source may also contribute to autonomous decision-making. This study examined preferences regarding a recommendation from the NHS and information provision in the context of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening.

METHODS

In face-to-face interviews, a population-based sample of adults across Britain (n=1964; age 50-80 years) indicated their preference between: (1) a strong recommendation to participate in CRC screening, (2) a recommendation alongside advice to make an individual decision, and (3) no recommendation but advice to make an individual decision. Other measures included trust in the NHS and preferences for information on benefits and risks.

RESULTS

Most respondents (84%) preferred a recommendation (47% strong recommendation, 37% recommendation plus individual decision-making advice), but the majority also wanted full information on risks (77%) and benefits (78%). Men were more in favour of a recommendation than women (86% vs 81%). Trust in the NHS was high overall, but the minority who expressed low trust were less likely to want a recommendation.

CONCLUSION

Most British adults want full information on risks and benefits of screening but they also want a recommendation from an authoritative source. An 'expert' view may be an important part of autonomous health decision-making.

摘要

背景

以知情决策为基础的癌症筛查方法强调了决策应取决于个人的价值观和偏好。然而,来自可信赖的来源的建议也可能有助于做出自主决策。本研究考察了在结直肠癌(CRC)筛查背景下,对来自英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的建议和信息提供的偏好。

方法

在面对面访谈中,英国各地的成年人(n=1964;年龄 50-80 岁)基于以下三种情况表示了自己的偏好:(1)强烈建议参加 CRC 筛查;(2)建议并提供个人决策的建议;(3)不建议但提供个人决策的建议。其他措施包括对 NHS 的信任度以及对益处和风险信息的偏好。

结果

大多数受访者(84%)更喜欢建议(47%的强烈建议,37%的建议加个人决策建议),但大多数人也希望获得关于风险(77%)和益处(78%)的完整信息。男性比女性更倾向于建议(86%比 81%)。总体而言,对 NHS 的信任度较高,但少数表示信任度较低的人不太希望得到建议。

结论

大多数英国成年人希望获得有关筛查风险和益处的全面信息,但他们也希望得到权威来源的建议。“专家”的观点可能是自主健康决策的重要组成部分。