• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉支架置入术中抽吸与再灌注技术的效果

Effects of Aspiration and Re-transfusion Technique with Carotid Artery Stenting.

作者信息

Tokuyama Yoshiaki, Takada Tatsuro, Usuki Noriko, Takaishi Satoshi, Tatsuno Kentaro, Hamada Yuki, Otubo Haruki, Ueda Toshihiro

机构信息

Department of Strokology, Stroke Center, St. Marianna University Toyoko Hospital, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.

出版信息

J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2020;14(11):475-480. doi: 10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0109. Epub 2020 Aug 18.

DOI:10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0109
PMID:37501761
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10370941/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Embolic stroke is the most serious complication after carotid artery stenting (CAS). The incidence rate of embolic stroke is reduced by the use of embolic protection devices (EPDs); however, there is no consensus on which EPD is the most effective. The aspiration and re-transfusion technique (ART) with CAS under distal balloon protection was adopted at our center to reduce the incidence of embolic complications. This retrospective study investigated the effects of ART.

METHODS

From November 2010, 243 consecutive patients treated by CAS under distal balloon protection were included. ART was performed on 202 patients (ART group) and the other 40 patients only received distal balloon protection (non-ART group). In ART, the blood from the aspiration catheter was continuously returned through a filter to the femoral vein. The amount of debris was assessed intermittently using a small blood sample and the rest was returned. We investigated the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-positive rate and symptomatic ischemic stroke one day after CAS.

RESULTS

Compared with the non-ART group, the incidence of DWI-positive lesions (22.7% vs 37.5%, P = 0.07) and frequency of symptomatic ischemic stroke (0.9% vs 5.0%, P = 0.12) were reduced in the ART group. The hemoglobin reduction rate was significantly reduced by ART (11.1% vs 14.9%, P <0.01). In the ART group, the frequency of multiple lesions (more than 5) and large lesions (more than 10 mm) was lower than that in the non-ART group (P <0.01, P = 0.14).

CONCLUSION

CAS under distal balloon protection with ART was effective at reducing the incidence of DWI-positive lesions and may be useful to reduce the incidence of symptomatic ischemic stroke.

摘要

目的

栓塞性卒中是颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)后最严重的并发症。使用栓塞保护装置(EPD)可降低栓塞性卒中的发生率;然而,对于哪种EPD最有效尚无共识。我们中心采用在远端球囊保护下的CAS联合抽吸再灌注技术(ART)来降低栓塞并发症的发生率。这项回顾性研究调查了ART的效果。

方法

从2010年11月起,纳入243例在远端球囊保护下接受CAS治疗的连续患者。202例患者接受了ART(ART组),另外40例患者仅接受远端球囊保护(非ART组)。在ART中,抽吸导管抽出的血液通过过滤器持续回输至股静脉。使用少量血样间歇性评估碎片量,其余血液回输。我们调查了CAS术后一天的扩散加权成像(DWI)阳性率和症状性缺血性卒中情况。

结果

与非ART组相比,ART组DWI阳性病变的发生率(22.7%对37.5%,P = 0.07)和症状性缺血性卒中的发生率(0.9%对5.0%,P = 0.12)有所降低。ART显著降低了血红蛋白降低率(11.1%对14.9%,P <0.01)。在ART组中,多个病变(超过5个)和大病变(超过10 mm)的发生率低于非ART组(P <0.01,P = 0.14)。

结论

在远端球囊保护下联合ART的CAS在降低DWI阳性病变发生率方面有效,可能有助于降低症状性缺血性卒中的发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf81/10370941/2aa5cd9abe8c/jnet-14-475-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf81/10370941/2aa5cd9abe8c/jnet-14-475-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf81/10370941/2aa5cd9abe8c/jnet-14-475-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of Aspiration and Re-transfusion Technique with Carotid Artery Stenting.颈动脉支架置入术中抽吸与再灌注技术的效果
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2020;14(11):475-480. doi: 10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0109. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
2
Double balloon protection during carotid artery stenting for vulnerable carotid stenosis reduces the incidence of new brain lesions.在对易损性颈动脉狭窄进行颈动脉支架置入术期间采用双球囊保护可降低新发脑损伤的发生率。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Jul;158(7):1377-86. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2816-2. Epub 2016 May 2.
3
Comparison of dual protection and distal filter protection as a distal embolic protection method during carotid artery stenting: a single-center carotid artery stenting experience.颈动脉支架置入术中双保护与远端滤网保护作为远端栓塞保护方法的比较:单中心颈动脉支架置入经验
Neurosurg Rev. 2015 Oct;38(4):671-6. doi: 10.1007/s10143-015-0639-x. Epub 2015 May 9.
4
Very Low Rate of New Brain Lesions After Vulnerable Carotid Artery Stenting Cases Using Only FilterWire EZ as Distal Embolic Protection.仅使用 FilterWire EZ 作为远端栓塞保护装置时,易损颈动脉支架置入术后新发脑损伤的发生率非常低。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Sep;141:e145-e150. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.028. Epub 2020 May 11.
5
Significance of combining distal filter protection and a guiding catheter with temporary balloon occlusion for carotid artery stenting: clinical results and evaluation of debris capture.远端滤器保护联合引导导管与临时球囊阻断用于颈动脉支架置入术的意义:临床结果及碎片捕获评估
Ann Vasc Surg. 2012 Oct;26(7):929-36. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2012.04.022.
6
Cerebral ischemic lesions detected with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging after carotid artery stenting: Comparison of several anti-embolic protection devices.颈动脉支架置入术后通过磁共振扩散加权成像检测到的脑缺血性病变:几种抗栓保护装置的比较
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2009 Sep;49(9):386-93. doi: 10.2176/nmc.49.386.
7
Carotid stenting of asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid artery stenoses with and without the use of a distal embolic protection device.使用和不使用远端栓子保护装置对无症状和有症状的颈动脉狭窄进行颈动脉支架置入术。
Acta Cardiol. 2011 Aug;66(4):453-8. doi: 10.1080/ac.66.4.2126593.
8
Cerebral ischemia detected with diffusion-weighted MR imaging after protected carotid artery stenting: comparison of distal balloon and filter device.经保护颈动脉支架置入术后磁共振扩散加权成像检测到的脑缺血:远端球囊与滤网装置的比较
Korean J Radiol. 2007 Jul-Aug;8(4):276-85. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2007.8.4.276.
9
Proximal versus distal embolic protection for carotid artery stenting: a national cardiovascular data registry analysis.近端与远端保护装置在颈动脉支架置入术中的应用:一项全国心血管数据注册分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 20;8(4):609-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.02.001.
10
Comparison of embolization protection device-specific technical difficulties during carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术中不同栓塞保护装置的特定技术难点比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Jul;44(1):56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.03.035.

本文引用的文献

1
Editor's Choice - Predictors of New Ischaemic Brain Lesions on Diffusion Weighted Imaging After Carotid Stenting and Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review.编辑精选 - 颈动脉支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术后脑弥散加权成像上新的缺血性脑病变的预测因素:系统评价。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Aug;58(2):163-174. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.04.016. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
2
Carotid Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗无症状性颈动脉狭窄的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2017 Aug;48(8):2150-2157. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016824. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
3
Randomized Trial of Stent versus Surgery for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.
无症状性颈动脉狭窄支架治疗与手术治疗随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 17;374(11):1011-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515706. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
4
Characteristics of ischemic brain lesions after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: results from the international carotid stenting study-magnetic resonance imaging substudy.症状性颈动脉狭窄支架置入或内膜切除术治疗后缺血性脑损伤的特征:来自国际颈动脉支架研究-磁共振成像子研究的结果。
Stroke. 2013 Jan;44(1):80-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.673152. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
5
The PROFI study (Prevention of Cerebral Embolization by Proximal Balloon Occlusion Compared to Filter Protection During Carotid Artery Stenting): a prospective randomized trial.PROFI 研究(颈动脉支架置入术中近端球囊闭塞与滤器保护预防脑栓塞的前瞻性随机试验)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 10;59(15):1383-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.035. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
6
Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis.颈动脉狭窄的血管内支架成形术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):11-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912321. Epub 2010 May 26.
7
Safety and effectiveness of the INVATEC MO.MA proximal cerebral protection device during carotid artery stenting: results from the ARMOUR pivotal trial.在颈动脉支架置入术中 INVATEC MO.MA 近端脑保护装置的安全性和有效性:ARMOUR 关键试验结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jul 1;76(1):1-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22439.
8
Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial.症状性颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术与内膜切除术的比较(国际颈动脉支架研究):一项随机对照试验的中期分析。
Lancet. 2010 Mar 20;375(9719):985-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60239-5. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
9
Sympathetic control of the cerebral vasculature in humans.人类大脑血管的交感神经控制。
Stroke. 2010 Jan;41(1):102-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.557132. Epub 2009 Dec 10.
10
Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis.有症状的重度颈动脉狭窄患者行内膜切除术与支架置入术的比较
N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 19;355(16):1660-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061752.