• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进移民妇女的心理社会福祉与赋权:干预措施的系统评价

Promoting Psychosocial Well-Being and Empowerment of Immigrant Women: A Systematic Review of Interventions.

作者信息

Silva Patricia, Pereira Henrique

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Education, Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Pólo IV, 6200-209 Covilhã, Portugal.

Research Centre in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development (CIDESD), 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jul 12;13(7):579. doi: 10.3390/bs13070579.

DOI:10.3390/bs13070579
PMID:37504026
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10376121/
Abstract

This systematic review (SLR), based on the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, aims to present a current overview of interventions aimed at promoting the psychosocial well-being and/or empowerment (PWE) of immigrant women in order to guide future projects. Data collection was performed in the SCOPUS and Web of Science databases, with studies published between 2012 and 20 March 2023 in English, Portuguese, and Spanish. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were based on the PICO guidelines: (P) immigrant women, (I) interventions to improve PWE, (C) comparison between the initial and final phases, and (O) evaluated results for PWE. Risk of bias was assessed, and most of the studies met more than 80% of the JBI bias criteria and had moderate quality on GRADE. Thirteen studies with 585 participants were included, mostly non-randomized, non-equivalent, and with an experimental-control group design. The main components of interventions were health education/psychoeducation, counseling, cognitive restructuring, and expressive therapies. A descriptive synthesis of qualitative and quantitative data was made to evaluate the results of the interventions in PWE. In the experimental studies, results assessed improvements mainly in mood and depression levels, and stress reduction. Empowerment components were less covered. Experimental groups performed better in almost all variables in the comparison with control groups. The strongest interventions were psychoeducation and cognitive restructuring techniques. The main limitations of the studies were the lack of quality of several studies, sample size and representativeness, language, and the possibility of response bias. Even taking this into account, this article makes an original contribution by advocating for evidence-based practice and offering significant implications for health professionals, policy makers, and researchers that work with the integrative health of immigrant women. This SLR is registered in PROPESRO Registration: CRD42023399683. PS is a research fellow of the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) of Portugal.

摘要

本系统评价(SLR)基于PRISMA 2020指南,旨在呈现当前针对促进移民妇女心理社会福祉和/或赋权(PWE)的干预措施概述,以指导未来项目。数据收集在SCOPUS和科学网数据库中进行,纳入2012年至2023年3月20日期间以英文、葡萄牙文和西班牙文发表的研究。纳入和排除标准基于PICO指南:(P)移民妇女,(I)改善PWE的干预措施,(C)初始阶段与最终阶段的比较,以及(O)PWE的评估结果。评估了偏倚风险,大多数研究符合超过80%的JBI偏倚标准,在GRADE上质量中等。纳入了13项研究,共585名参与者,大多为非随机、非等效且采用实验对照组设计。干预措施的主要组成部分是健康教育/心理教育、咨询、认知重构和表达性疗法。对定性和定量数据进行了描述性综合分析,以评估干预措施对PWE的效果。在实验研究中,结果主要评估了情绪和抑郁水平的改善以及压力减轻情况。赋权部分的涵盖较少。与对照组相比,实验组在几乎所有变量上表现更好。最强有力的干预措施是心理教育和认知重构技术。研究的主要局限性在于多项研究质量欠佳、样本量和代表性、语言以及存在应答偏倚的可能性。即便考虑到这些因素,本文通过倡导循证实践并为致力于移民妇女综合健康的卫生专业人员、政策制定者和研究人员提供重要启示,做出了原创性贡献。本SLR已在PROSPERO注册:CRD42023399683。PS是葡萄牙科学技术基金会(FCT)的研究员。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3de/10376121/89fdb25969cc/behavsci-13-00579-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3de/10376121/89fdb25969cc/behavsci-13-00579-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3de/10376121/89fdb25969cc/behavsci-13-00579-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Promoting Psychosocial Well-Being and Empowerment of Immigrant Women: A Systematic Review of Interventions.促进移民妇女的心理社会福祉与赋权:干预措施的系统评价
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jul 12;13(7):579. doi: 10.3390/bs13070579.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
6
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
7
The effectiveness of interventions to meet family needs of critically ill patients in an adult intensive care unit: a systematic review update.成人重症监护病房中满足重症患者家庭需求的干预措施的有效性:系统评价更新
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Mar;14(3):181-234. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2477.
8
Midwives' interventions for reducing fear of childbirth in pregnant women: a scoping review.助产士减轻孕妇分娩恐惧的干预措施:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Dec 1;20(12):2867-2935. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00382.
9
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a psychosocial adaptation scale for migrant women (PAS-MW).移民妇女心理社会适应量表(PAS-MW)的编制与验证
J Migr Health. 2025 Jul 25;12:100348. doi: 10.1016/j.jmh.2025.100348. eCollection 2025.
2
Refugee mothers' mental health in Denmark: possibilities and limits of home visiting programs.丹麦难民母亲的心理健康:家访项目的可能性与局限性
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2025 Apr;28(2):245-255. doi: 10.1007/s00737-024-01529-y. Epub 2024 Nov 19.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for immigrant and limited English proficient cancer patients.移民和英语水平有限的癌症患者的心理社会干预的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychooncology. 2023 Apr;32(4):516-557. doi: 10.1002/pon.6110. Epub 2023 Feb 26.
2
The mental health and well-being of internally displaced female Yazidis in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq: a realist review of psychosocial interventions and the impact of COVID-19.伊拉克库尔德地区境内流离失所的雅兹迪族女性的心理健康与福祉:心理社会干预措施及新冠疫情影响的现实主义综述
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2022 Nov 4;9:508-520. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2022.55. eCollection 2022.
3
Interventions to Improve the Reproductive Health of Undocumented Female Migrants and Refugees in Protracted Situations: A Systematic Review.
改善长期处境中无证女性移民和难民生殖健康的干预措施:系统评价。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022 Dec 21;10(6):1-15. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00418.
4
Interventions to improve immigrant women's mental health: A systematic review.干预措施改善移民妇女的心理健康:系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jun;32(11-12):2481-2493. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16378. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
5
Psychological well-being, risk factors, and coping strategies with social isolation and new challenges in times of adversity caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.心理健康、风险因素以及应对因 COVID-19 大流行导致的逆境中的社会隔离和新挑战的策略。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 May;225:103538. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103538. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
6
Development, feasibility, acceptability and preliminary evaluation of the internet and mobile phone-based BSHAPE intervention for Immigrant survivors of cumulative trauma.基于互联网和移动电话的 BSHAPE 干预方案用于累积性创伤的移民幸存者:发展、可行性、可接受性和初步评估。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Nov;110:106591. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106591. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
7
Effects of laughter therapy on the stress response of married immigrant women in South Korea: A randomized controlled trial.笑声疗法对韩国已婚移民女性应激反应的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Health Care Women Int. 2022 May;43(5):518-531. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2021.1963968. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
8
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
9
Impact of a Web-Based Psychiatric Assessment on the Mental Health and Well-Being of Individuals Presenting With Depressive Symptoms: Longitudinal Observational Study.基于网络的精神科评估对出现抑郁症状个体的心理健康和幸福感的影响:纵向观察性研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Feb 22;8(2):e23813. doi: 10.2196/23813.
10
Discrimination and Psychosocial Well-Being of Migrants in Spain: The Moderating Role of Sense of Community.西班牙移民的歧视与心理社会福祉:社区归属感的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 18;11:2235. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02235. eCollection 2020.