Jarosz Jakub, Królikowska Paulina, Matykiewicz Patryk, Aschenbrenner Piotr, Ewertowska Paulina, Krzysztofik Michał
Institute of Sport Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, 40-065 Katowice, Poland.
Department of Biomechanics and Sports Engineering, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, 80-336 Gdansk, Poland.
Sports (Basel). 2023 Jun 23;11(7):124. doi: 10.3390/sports11070124.
The objective of this study was to compare (i) The effects of a flywheel and free-weight resistance training program; and (ii) The effects of performing lateral and frontal split squats as part of a flywheel-resistance training program on jumping performance, the 5-0-5 change of direction test time, and the one-repetition maximum (1RM) back squat in soccer players. Twenty-four male amateur soccer players participated in this study and were randomly and equally assigned to one of three different test groups: forward split-squat group (FSQ); lateral split-squat group (LSQ); and free-weight training group (TRAD). Athletes in the FSQ group performed a squat and a forward split squat on a flywheel device, while those in the LSQ group performed a squat and a lateral split squat (instead of a forward split squat) on a flywheel device. Each training lasted 4 weeks. The main finding was that all training groups, such as TRAD, FSQ, and LSQ, significantly improved broad jump length ( = 0.001; effect size [ES] = 0.36), 5-0-5 COD time with a turn on the dominant limb ( = 0.038; ES = 0.49), and 1RM back squat ( = 0.001; ES = 0.4). In turn, both flywheel-resistance training groups (FSQ and LSQ) significantly improved their counter-movement jump height ( = 0.001; ES = 0.8 and = 0.002; ES = 0.58; respectively) with no effect in the TRAD ( = 0.676; ES = 0.07) training group. Both free-weight and flywheel-resistance training lasting 4 weeks performed in-season contributed to significant improvement in 1RM back squat, broad jump performance, and 5-0-5 change of direction testing time, while flywheel-resistance training might be superior in counter-movement jump height enhancement in soccer players. Moreover, the manner in which split squats were performed was not a factor influencing the obtained results.
(i)飞轮训练和自由重量抗阻训练计划的效果;以及(ii)作为飞轮抗阻训练计划一部分进行的侧分腿蹲和前分腿蹲对足球运动员跳跃成绩、5-0-5变向测试时间和一次重复最大重量(1RM)后蹲的影响。24名男性业余足球运动员参与了本研究,并被随机且平均分配到三个不同的测试组之一:前分腿蹲组(FSQ);侧分腿蹲组(LSQ);以及自由重量训练组(TRAD)。FSQ组的运动员在飞轮装置上进行深蹲和前分腿蹲,而LSQ组的运动员在飞轮装置上进行深蹲和侧分腿蹲(而非前分腿蹲)。每次训练持续4周。主要研究结果是,所有训练组,如TRAD组、FSQ组和LSQ组,均显著提高了立定跳远成绩(P = 0.001;效应量[ES] = 0.36)、优势腿转身的5-0-5变向时间(P = 0.038;ES = 0.49)以及1RM后蹲成绩(P = 0.001;ES = 0.4)。相应地,两个飞轮抗阻训练组(FSQ组和LSQ组)均显著提高了他们的反向移动跳跃高度(分别为P = 0.001;ES = 0.8和P = 0.002;ES = 0.58),而TRAD训练组则无此效果(P = 0.676;ES = 0.07)。在赛季中进行的为期4周的自由重量训练和飞轮抗阻训练均有助于显著提高1RM后蹲成绩、立定跳远成绩和5-0-5变向测试时间,而飞轮抗阻训练在提高足球运动员反向移动跳跃高度方面可能更具优势。此外,进行分腿蹲的方式并非影响所得结果的因素。