Wilson Michele, Lucas Aaron, Mendes Diana, Vyse Andrew, Mikudina Boglarka, Czudek Carole, Ellsbury Gillian Frances, Perdrizet Johnna
RTI Health Solutions, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, Morrisville, NC 27709, USA.
Pfizer Ltd., Walton Oaks, Dorking Road, Surrey, Tadworth KT20 7NS, UK.
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jun 28;11(7):1168. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11071168.
Currently, the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) is administered under a 1+1 (1 primary dose) pediatric schedule in the United Kingdom (UK). Higher-valency PCVs, 15-valent PCV (PCV15), or 20-valent PCV (PCV20) might be considered to expand serotype coverage. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of PCV20 or PCV15 using either a 2+1 (2 primary doses) or 1+1 schedule for pediatric immunization in the UK. Using a dynamic transmission model, we simulated future disease incidence and costs under PCV13 1+1, PCV20 2+1, PCV20 1+1, PCV15 2+1, and PCV15 1+1 schedules from the UK National Health Service perspective. We prospectively estimated disease cases, direct costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Scenario analyses were performed to estimate the impact of model assumptions and parameter uncertainty. Over a five-year period, PCV20 2+1 averted the most disease cases and gained the most additional QALYs. PCV20 2+1 and 1+1 were dominant (cost-saving and more QALYs gained) compared with PCV15 (2+1 or 1+1) and PCV13 1+1. PCV20 2+1 was cost-effective (GBP 8110/QALY) compared with PCV20 1+1. PCV20 was found cost-saving compared with PCV13 1+1, and PCV20 2+1 was cost-effective compared with PCV20 1+1. Policymakers should consider the reduction in disease cases with PCV20, which may offset vaccination costs.
目前,13价肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV13)在英国按照1+1(1剂次基础免疫)的儿童免疫程序进行接种。更高价次的肺炎球菌结合疫苗,如15价肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV15)或20价肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV20),可能会被考虑用于扩大血清型覆盖范围。我们评估了在英国儿童免疫中使用2+1(2剂次基础免疫)或1+1程序接种PCV20或PCV15的成本效益。我们使用动态传播模型,从英国国家医疗服务体系的角度模拟了在PCV13 1+1、PCV20 2+1、PCV20 1+1、PCV15 2+1和PCV15 1+1免疫程序下未来的疾病发病率和成本。我们前瞻性地估计了疾病病例数、直接成本、质量调整生命年(QALYs)和增量成本效益比。进行了情景分析以估计模型假设和参数不确定性的影响。在五年期间,PCV20 2+1预防的疾病病例数最多,获得的额外QALYs也最多。与PCV15(2+1或1+1)和PCV13 1+1相比,PCV20 2+1和1+1具有优势(节省成本且获得更多QALYs)。与PCV20 1+1相比,PCV20 2+1具有成本效益(8110英镑/QALY)。与PCV13 1+1相比,PCV20具有成本节约优势,与PCV20 1+1相比,PCV20 2+1具有成本效益。政策制定者应考虑PCV20可减少疾病病例数,这可能抵消疫苗接种成本。