利用匹配对照组评估成人食品 literacy 项目的效果。
Determining the Effectiveness of an Adult Food Literacy Program Using a Matched Control Group.
机构信息
School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Rural Health West, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
出版信息
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2023 Sep;55(9):659-666. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2023.06.001. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the effect of Food Sensations for Adults on food literacy behaviors and selected dietary behaviors.
METHODS
A quasi-experimental design using preprogram and postprogram questionnaires over 4 weeks with a control group (n = 75) matched for sex, age group, and socioeconomic disadvantage to program participants (n = 867). General linear mixed models assessed change in food literacy behavior frequency in 3 self-reported domains (plan and manage, selection, and preparation) and fruit and vegetable servings.
RESULTS
Postprogram, Food Sensations for Adults participants reported modest yet statistically significant score improvements in 2 of the 3 domains of food literacy behaviors in the plan and manage (12.4%) and preparation (9.8%) domains, as well as servings of vegetables (22.6% or 0.5 servings).
CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS
Quasi-experimental designs indicate food literacy programs can produce modest short-term changes across a range of food literacy and dietary behaviors.
目的
确定成人食物感知对食物素养行为和某些饮食行为的影响。
方法
采用准实验设计，在 4 周内使用预编程和后编程问卷，并设置对照组（n=75），与项目参与者（n=867）在性别、年龄组和社会经济劣势方面相匹配。使用广义线性混合模型评估 3 个自我报告领域（计划和管理、选择和准备）以及水果和蔬菜份量中食物素养行为频率的变化。
结果
成人食物感知项目参与者在后测中报告称，在计划和管理（12.4%）和准备（9.8%）领域以及蔬菜份量（22.6%或 0.5 份）这 3 个食物素养行为领域中的 2 个领域的分数有适度但具有统计学意义的提高。
结论和意义
准实验设计表明，食物素养计划可以在一系列食物素养和饮食行为方面产生适度的短期变化。
Zotero 插件