Institute for Hygiene and Public Health, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
Institute for Hygiene and Public Health, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 30;13(7):e072284. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072284.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters on COVID-19 period prevalence in kindergartens.
The observational study follows an intervention design with the intervention group using HEPA filters and the control group not.
The study was conducted in 32 (10 intervention, 22 control) kindergartens (daycare centres) in Rhineland Palatinate (Germany).
Data of 2360 children (663 intervention, 1697 control) were reported by the kindergarten heads. Data were collected on institutional level without any identifying information on individuals. Thus, all children of all facilities were included; however, no demographic data were recorded.
The study followed a quasi-interventional design, as no formal intervention was conducted. A charity foundation equipped kindergartens with HEPA filters. These kindergartens were enrolled as intervention group. The control group was recruited from the neighbouring communities and districts.
The primary outcome measure was the number of COVID-19 cases reported by the kindergarten heads, converted into period prevalence rates per 1000 population.
The mean COVID-19 period prevalence rates of the control and intervention groups were 186 (95% CI: 137.8 to 238.9) and 372 (95% CI: 226.6 to 517.6) per 1000 children, respectively. The one-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test indicates a p value of 0.989; thus, the hypothesised preventive effect of HEPA filters could not be confirmed in the kindergarten setting.
While HEPA filters can significantly reduce the viral load in room air, this does not lead to reduced COVID-19 prevalence in the selected kindergartens in Germany. It is known that contagion mainly occurs via direct face-to-face air exchange during play and that the contaminated air does not necessarily pass through the filter prior to air exchange between children. The use of HEPA filters may also lead to a sense of security, leading to reduced preventive behaviour.
本研究旨在评估高效空气过滤器(HEPA)对幼儿园内 COVID-19 流行期患病率的影响。
本观察性研究采用干预设计,干预组使用 HEPA 过滤器,对照组则不使用。
研究在德国莱茵兰-普法尔茨州的 32 所(10 所干预组,22 所对照组)幼儿园(日托中心)进行。
由幼儿园园长报告了 2360 名儿童(663 名干预组,1697 名对照组)的数据。数据在机构层面收集,没有任何个人身份信息。因此,所有设施的所有儿童都包括在内;然而,没有记录任何人口统计学数据。
该研究遵循准干预设计,因为没有进行正式干预。一个慈善基金会为幼儿园配备了 HEPA 过滤器。这些幼儿园被纳入干预组。对照组则从附近的社区和地区招募。
主要结局测量指标为幼儿园园长报告的 COVID-19 病例数,转换为每 1000 人口的流行期患病率。
对照组和干预组的平均 COVID-19 流行期患病率分别为每 1000 名儿童 186(95%CI:137.8 至 238.9)和 372(95%CI:226.6 至 517.6)。单边 Wilcoxon 秩和检验的 p 值为 0.989;因此,在幼儿园环境中,未能证实 HEPA 过滤器的假设预防效果。
虽然 HEPA 过滤器可以显著降低室内空气中的病毒载量,但这并不会导致德国选定幼儿园 COVID-19 患病率降低。众所周知,传染主要是通过玩耍时的直接面对面空气交换发生的,并且受污染的空气在儿童之间进行空气交换之前不一定通过过滤器。使用 HEPA 过滤器也可能导致安全感增强,从而减少预防行为。