Suppr超能文献

新冠病毒气溶胶在学校中的传播:不同干预措施的有效性。

SARS-CoV-2 aerosol transmission in schools: the effectiveness of different interventions.

机构信息

Global Studies Institute, University of Geneva, Switzerland.

European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Swiss Med Wkly. 2022 May 23;152:w30178. doi: 10.4414/smw.2022.w30178. eCollection 2022 Jun 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Indoor aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 has been widely recognised, especially in schools where children remain in closed indoor spaces and largely unvaccinated. Measures such as strategic natural ventilation and high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration remain poorly implemented and mask mandates are often progressively lifted as vaccination rollout is enhanced.

METHODS

We adapted a previously developed aerosol transmission model to study the effect of interventions (natural ventilation, face masks, HEPA filtration and their combinations) on the concentration of virus particles in a classroom of 160 m3 containing one infectious individual. The cumulative dose of viruses absorbed by exposed occupants was calculated.

RESULTS

In the absence of interventions, the cumulative dose absorbed was 1.5 times higher in winter than in spring/summer, increasing chances of indoor airborne transmission in winter. However, natural ventilation was more effective in winter, leading to up to a 20-fold decrease in cumulative dose when six windows were fully open at all times. In winter, partly opening two windows all day or fully opening six windows at the end of each class was effective as well (2.7- to 3-fold decrease). In summer, good ventilation levels could be achieved through the opening of windows all day long (2- to 7-fold decrease depending on the number of windows open). Opening windows only during yard and lunch breaks had minimal effect (≤1.5-fold decrease). One HEPA filter was as effective as two windows partly open all day in winter (3-fold decrease) whereas two filters were more effective (5-fold decrease). Surgical face masks were very effective independently of the season (8-fold decrease). Combined interventions (i.e., natural ventilation, masks, and HEPA filtration) were the most effective (≥25-fold decrease) and remained highly effective in the presence of a super-spreader.

INTERPRETATION

Natural ventilation, face masks, and HEPA filtration are effective interventions to reduce SARS-CoV-2 aerosol transmission. These measures should be combined and complemented by additional interventions (e.g., physical distancing, hygiene, testing, contact tracing and vaccination) to maximise benefit.

摘要

背景

室内气溶胶传播 SARS-CoV-2 已被广泛认可,尤其是在儿童仍处于封闭室内空间且大部分未接种疫苗的学校。战略自然通风和高效微粒空气 (HEPA) 过滤等措施仍未得到充分实施,随着疫苗接种工作的推进,口罩强制令通常会逐步取消。

方法

我们对以前开发的气溶胶传播模型进行了改编,以研究干预措施(自然通风、口罩、HEPA 过滤及其组合)对含有一名感染个体的 160m3 教室中病毒颗粒浓度的影响。计算暴露人员吸收的病毒累积剂量。

结果

在没有干预措施的情况下,冬季累积剂量比春季/夏季高 1.5 倍,增加了冬季室内空气传播的机会。然而,自然通风在冬季更有效,当六个窗户始终完全打开时,累积剂量可降低 20 倍。在冬季,整天部分打开两个窗户或在每节课结束时完全打开六个窗户也同样有效(降低 2.7-3 倍)。在夏季,通过整天打开窗户可以达到良好的通风水平(根据打开窗户的数量,降低 2-7 倍)。仅在课间休息和午餐时间打开窗户效果甚微(降低≤1.5 倍)。一个 HEPA 过滤器的效果与冬季整天部分打开两个窗户相同(降低 3 倍),而两个过滤器的效果更好(降低 5 倍)。外科口罩在任何季节都非常有效(降低 8 倍)。组合干预措施(即自然通风、口罩和 HEPA 过滤)是最有效的(降低≥25 倍),并且在存在超级传播者的情况下仍然非常有效。

解释

自然通风、口罩和 HEPA 过滤是减少 SARS-CoV-2 气溶胶传播的有效干预措施。这些措施应结合使用,并辅以其他干预措施(例如,保持社交距离、卫生、检测、接触者追踪和接种疫苗),以最大限度地提高效益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验