Suppr超能文献

经典扎根理论在护理研究中的应用:一项定性系统评价研究方案。

Application of classic grounded theory in nursing studies: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, CQUniversity Brisbane, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, CQUniversity, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 30;13(7):e068588. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068588.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Classic grounded theory (CGT) is a valuable method for nursing research, but the application of CGT methodology in nursing studies has not been specifically investigated. With the increasing use of CGT in nursing research, attention is now focusing on the quality of studies using this methodology. In this systematic review, we aim to develop an understanding of the application of CGT methodology, specifically appraising the quality of the methodology's application in the field of nursing research.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The reporting of this review will be guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analysis guidelines statement and data synthesis guided by the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis guideline. Publications will be uploaded to Rayyan. The quality of each article will be assessed using the Critical Appraisals Skills Programme qualitative research appraisal tool. Analysis of the selected studies will be performed using the Guideline for Reporting and Evaluating Grounded Theory Research Studies, explicitly the CGT guiding principles.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required because only secondary data will be used in this review. The results of the final study will be published in a peer-reviewed open-access journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021281103.

摘要

简介

经典扎根理论(CGT)是护理研究的一种有价值的方法,但 CGT 方法在护理研究中的应用尚未得到专门研究。随着 CGT 在护理研究中的应用越来越多,现在人们开始关注使用这种方法的研究的质量。在本次系统评价中,我们旨在了解 CGT 方法学的应用情况,特别是评估该方法在护理研究领域中的应用质量。

方法和分析

本综述的报告将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析指南声明的首选报告项目,并根据无荟萃分析指南进行数据综合。出版物将上传至 Rayyan。使用批判性评估技能计划定性研究评估工具评估每篇文章的质量。使用指导报告和评估扎根理论研究的准则,明确 CGT 指导原则,对选定的研究进行分析。

伦理和传播

由于本综述仅使用二次数据,因此不需要伦理批准。最终研究的结果将发表在同行评议的开放获取期刊上。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42021281103。

相似文献

6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

4
A systematic review of grounded theory studies in physiotherapy.系统综述物理治疗中的扎根理论研究。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2019 Dec;35(12):1139-1169. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1474403. Epub 2018 May 23.
6
What is grounded theory?什么是扎根理论?
Evid Based Nurs. 2016 Apr;19(2):34-5. doi: 10.1136/eb-2016-102306. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
10
Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework.质性框架内的方法严谨性。
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Nov;48(4):388-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03207.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验