Goodman Laura F, Birnbaum Flyer Zoe, Schomberg John, Maginas Mary, Wallace Elizabeth, Vukcevich Olivia, Awan Saeed, Gibbs David, Nahmias Jeffry, Guner Yigit S
Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, CA, United States.
Surg Open Sci. 2023 Jun 21;14:46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.06.004. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Electric bicycles (e-bikes) achieve higher speeds than pedal bicycles, but few studies have investigated the impact on injury rates specific to the pediatric population. Utilizing the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS), we compared rates of pediatric injury for e-bikes, bicycles, and gas-engine bicycles (mopeds) from 2011 to 2020.
Descriptive and bivariate inferential analyses were performed upon NEISS estimates of e-bike, bicycle, and moped injuries in children aged 2-18 years. Analyses were stratified by patient age and helmet usage. The Mann-Kendall test of trends was used.
We identified 3945 e-bike, 23,389 moped, and 2.05 million bicycle injuries. Over time, the incidence of injury increased for e-bikes (Kendall's =0.73, p = 0.004), decreased for pedal bicycles (Kendall's = - 0.91, p = 0.0003), and did not change for mopeds (Kendall's = 0.06, p = 0.85). Males accounted for 82.5 % of e-bike injuries. The age group most commonly affected by e-bike injury (44.3 %) was 10-13 years old. The proportion of injuries requiring hospitalization was significantly higher for e-bikes (11.5 %), compared to moped and bicycle (7.0 and 4.8 %, respectively, p < 0.0001). In cases where helmet use or absence was reported, 97.3 % of e-bike riders were without a helmet at the time of injury, compared to 82.1 % of pedal bicycle riders and 87.2 % of moped riders.
The rate of pediatric e-bike injuries increased over the study period. Compared to riders on pedal bicycles or mopeds, children on e-bikes had infrequent helmet use and increased rate of hospitalization. These findings suggest that attention to e-bike safety and increasing helmet usage are important to public health among the pediatric population.
IV.
电动自行车的行驶速度比普通自行车快,但很少有研究调查其对儿童群体受伤率的影响。利用国家电子伤害监测系统(NEISS),我们比较了2011年至2020年电动自行车、普通自行车和燃气发动机自行车(助力车)导致的儿童受伤率。
对NEISS估算的2至18岁儿童电动自行车、普通自行车和助力车受伤情况进行描述性和双变量推断分析。分析按患者年龄和头盔使用情况分层。采用趋势的曼-肯德尔检验。
我们识别出3945起电动自行车受伤案例、23389起助力车受伤案例和205万起普通自行车受伤案例。随着时间推移,电动自行车的受伤发生率上升(肯德尔系数=0.73,p=0.004),普通自行车的受伤发生率下降(肯德尔系数=-0.91,p=0.0003),助力车的受伤发生率没有变化(肯德尔系数=0.06,p=0.85)。电动自行车受伤案例中82.5%为男性。电动自行车受伤最常见的年龄组(44.3%)为10至13岁。电动自行车受伤后需要住院治疗的比例(11.5%)显著高于助力车和普通自行车(分别为7.0%和4.8%,p<0.0001)。在报告了是否佩戴头盔的案例中,电动自行车骑行者受伤时未佩戴头盔的比例为97.3%,相比之下,普通自行车骑行者为82.1%,助力车骑行者为87.2%。
在研究期间,儿童电动自行车受伤率上升。与普通自行车或助力车骑行者相比,电动自行车儿童骑行者佩戴头盔的情况较少,住院率更高。这些发现表明,关注电动自行车安全和提高头盔使用率对儿童群体的公共卫生很重要。
四级。