• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一家农村教学医院7年间使用罗布森分类法对剖宫产情况的分析与趋势

Analysis and trends of caesarean sections using Robson's classification over 7-year period at a rural teaching hospital.

作者信息

Nadella Mahathi, Maila Shyam S, Nagelli Indira, Basany Kalpana

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Society for Health Allied Research and Education, MediCiti Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

出版信息

J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Dec;13(12):5550-5554. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_516_24. Epub 2024 Dec 9.

DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_516_24
PMID:39790743
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11709025/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A ten-group classification system of caesarean section was proposed by Michael Robson in 2001. It is helpful in comparing the rates of caesarean section between hospitals. The objective of this study was to determine the caesarean section rates to analyse trends of caesarean section and classify according to Robson's categories.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted from 2016 to 2022. A total of 3176 women who underwent caesarean section were grouped under Robson's ten-group classification system.

RESULTS

The most common group was Group 5 (All multiparous women with at least one previous uterine scar, with single cephalic pregnancy, ≥37 weeks gestation) followed by Group 2 (Nulliparous women, with single cephalic pregnancy, >37 weeks gestation who either had labour induced or were delivered by caesarean section before labour). Results were obtained for the specified period (from 2016 to 2022), and Group 5 contributes more to the total CS rates (45% in 2016, 46% in 2017, 46% in 2018, 57% in 2019, 49% in 2020, 52% in 2021, 54% in 2022), followed by Group 2 (20% in 2016, 17% in 2017, 18% in 2018, 19% in 2019, 26% in 2020, 24% in 2021, 24% in 2022).

CONCLUSION

Pregnant women with prior uterine scars contribute more to caesarean section rates according to Robson's categories. Hence, strategies must be implemented to lower the primary caesarean section rates.

摘要

背景

2001年迈克尔·罗布森提出了剖宫产的十组分类系统。它有助于比较不同医院的剖宫产率。本研究的目的是确定剖宫产率,分析剖宫产趋势,并根据罗布森分类进行分类。

方法

本横断面研究于2016年至2022年进行。共有3176例行剖宫产的妇女按照罗布森十组分类系统进行分组。

结果

最常见的组是第5组(所有有至少一次子宫瘢痕的经产妇,单头位妊娠,妊娠≥37周),其次是第2组(未产妇,单头位妊娠,妊娠>37周,引产或临产前剖宫产)。得出了特定时期(2016年至2022年)的结果,第5组对总剖宫产率的贡献更大(2016年为45%,2017年为46%,2018年为46%,2019年为57%,2020年为49%,2021年为52%,2022年为54%),其次是第2组(2016年为20%,2017年为17%,2018年为18%,2019年为19%,2020年为26%,2021年为24%,2022年为24%)。

结论

根据罗布森分类,有子宫瘢痕的孕妇对剖宫产率的贡献更大。因此,必须实施策略以降低首次剖宫产率。

相似文献

1
Analysis and trends of caesarean sections using Robson's classification over 7-year period at a rural teaching hospital.一家农村教学医院7年间使用罗布森分类法对剖宫产情况的分析与趋势
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Dec;13(12):5550-5554. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_516_24. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
2
Caesarean section rates from Malaysian tertiary hospitals using Robson's 10-group classification.马来西亚三甲医院采用罗伯逊 10 分组分类法的剖宫产率。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2760-2.
3
Robson's Group 2 Criteria among Total Caesarean Sections in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.罗森 2 组标准在一家三级保健医院中的剖宫产率:一项描述性的横断面研究。
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2021 Nov 15;59(243):1098-1101. doi: 10.31729/jnma.7138.
4
Risk adjustment models for interhospital comparison of CS rates using Robson's ten group classification system and other socio-demographic and clinical variables.利用罗伯逊的十分组分类系统和其他社会人口学及临床变量对 CS 率进行医院间比较的风险调整模型。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Jun 21;12:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-54.
5
Assessment of Caesarean Section Rates at Kathmandu Model Hospital Using the Robson's Ten Group Classification System.使用罗布森十组分类系统评估加德满都示范医院的剖宫产率
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2020 Jan 21;17(4):491-494. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v17i4.2117.
6
Analysis of cesarean section rates and its indications using robson's classification at a tertiary care hospital, Manipur.在曼尼普尔邦的一家三级护理医院,使用罗布森分类法分析剖宫产率及其指征。
Indian J Public Health. 2022 Oct-Dec;66(4):434-438. doi: 10.4103/ijph.ijph_1928_21.
7
Caesarean section rates: applying the modified ten-group Robson classification in an Australian tertiary hospital.剖宫产率:在澳大利亚一所三级医院应用改良的 Robson 十组分类法。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jan;42(1):61-66. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1873923. Epub 2021 May 2.
8
Caesarean section rates analysed using Robson's 10-Group Classification System: a cross-sectional study at a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia.剖宫产率分析采用罗伯逊的 10 组分类系统:在埃塞俄比亚一家三级医院的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 28;10(10):e039098. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039098.
9
Using Robson's Ten-Group Classification System for comparing caesarean section rates in Europe: an analysis of routine data from the Euro-Peristat study.使用 Robson 的十组分类系统比较欧洲的剖宫产率:来自 Euro-Peristat 研究的常规数据分析。
BJOG. 2021 Aug;128(9):1444-1453. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16634. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
10
Examining caesarean section rates in Canada using the Robson classification system.使用罗布森分类系统研究加拿大的剖宫产率。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Mar;35(3):206-214. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30992-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Robson Caesarean Calc© App: A User-Friendly Tool for Healthcare Providers.罗布森剖宫产计算应用程序(Robson Caesarean Calc© App):一款面向医疗服务提供者的用户友好型工具。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2025 Jun;75(3):264-269. doi: 10.1007/s13224-025-02137-1. Epub 2025 Jun 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Towards safer childbirth: a journey of a thousand miles.迈向更安全的分娩:千里之行。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Jul;101(7):837-838. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14381. Epub 2022 May 15.
2
Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.采用罗伯逊十组分类系统对埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴一所三级教学医院剖宫产率的分析:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Dec 9;20(1):767. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03474-x.
3
Trend Prediction for Cesarean Deliveries Based on Robson Classification System at a Tertiary Referral Unit of North India.基于罗布森分类系统对印度北部一家三级转诊医院剖宫产分娩情况的趋势预测
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2020 Apr;70(2):111-118. doi: 10.1007/s13224-019-01275-7. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
4
Identification of obstetric targets for reducing cesarean section rate using the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary level hospital.在一家三级医院使用罗布森十组分类法确定降低剖宫产率的产科目标。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Jun;189:91-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.03.030. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
5
Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys.利用 Robson 分类评估 21 个国家的剖宫产趋势:两项世卫组织多国家调查的二次分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 May;3(5):e260-70. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70094-X. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
6
Two practice models in one labor and delivery unit: association with cesarean delivery rates.一个产房的两种实践模式:与剖宫产率的关联
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;212(4):491.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
7
ACOG committee opinion no. 559: Cesarean delivery on maternal request.美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见 No.559:产妇要求剖宫产。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;121(4):904-907. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000428647.67925.d3.
8
Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate.实现和维持适当剖宫产率的方法。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Apr;27(2):297-308. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.004. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
9
Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop.预防首次剖宫产:尤尼斯·肯尼迪·施莱佛国立儿童健康与人类发育研究所、母胎医学学会和美国妇产科学院联合研讨会总结。
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;120(5):1181-93. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3182704880.
10
Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery.剖宫产的循证医学手术
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Nov;193(5):1607-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.03.063.