• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

这就是《危险边缘》!一种基于覆盖范围的灵活排班模型,用于解决病理学培训项目中的健康问题。

This is Jeopardy! A flexible coverage-based schedule model to address wellness for pathology training programs.

作者信息

Scapa Jason V, Naini Bita V, Pullarkat Sheeja, Sullivan Peggy S

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Acad Pathol. 2023 Jul 14;10(3):100087. doi: 10.1016/j.acpath.2023.100087. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.acpath.2023.100087
PMID:37520804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10371805/
Abstract

Scheduling rotations for a pathology training program involves balancing educational requirements, service coverage, and paid time off (PTO). Absences can affect training as residents cross-cover, managing multiple services at once. Other specialties utilize a "Jeopardy" based system for covering absences. In this system, residents on outpatient services are "jeopardized" to cover inpatient services for trainee absences. Borrowing this concept, we created a schedule model with a "Jeopardy-Elective" (JE) rotation to support resident absences. Prior to 2018-19, our residency program consisted of a 12 month-long rotation schedule. We adopted a 13 four-week block rotation model system, adding four JE rotations per resident over the course of training. The JE resident covered services during trainee absences and spent the remaining rotation on elective. We then conducted a pre- and post-intervention survey of all residents who trained in both systems. Following the change in schedule model, our results showed a statistically significant increase in resident satisfaction with taking PTO (p = 0.0014), finding coverage (p = 0.0006), and taking a sick day (p = 0.03). The mean number of days covered by the JE resident was 8.5 ± 2.7 workdays (out of 20). PTO usage increased from 16 to 20 days/resident while mean number of sick days decreased from 1.7 to 1.3 days per resident. There was overwhelming support with 82% of residents wanting to retain the new system going forward. Through use of the JE rotation, our program improved service coverage issues and resident satisfaction, with the long-term goal of enhanced resident well-being and enriched resident learning experiences.

摘要

为病理学培训项目安排轮转需要平衡教育要求、服务覆盖以及带薪休假(PTO)。由于住院医师要交叉负责多项服务,缺勤会影响培训。其他专业采用基于“危险边缘”的系统来应对缺勤情况。在这个系统中,门诊服务的住院医师会被“危及”去承担因实习生缺勤而产生的住院服务。借鉴这个概念,我们创建了一个带有“危险边缘 - 选修”(JE)轮转的排班模型来支持住院医师的缺勤。在2018 - 19学年之前,我们的住院医师培训项目采用为期12个月的轮转排班。我们采用了13个四周模块的轮转模型系统,在培训过程中每位住院医师增加了4次JE轮转。JE住院医师在实习生缺勤时承担服务,并将剩余的轮转时间用于选修。然后我们对在这两种系统中都接受过培训的所有住院医师进行了干预前后的调查。排班模型改变后,我们的结果显示住院医师在使用PTO(p = 0.0014)、找到替班(p = 0.0006)以及请病假(p = 0.03)方面的满意度有统计学意义的显著提高。JE住院医师平均承担的天数为8.5 ± 2.7个工作日(共20个工作日)。PTO的使用从每位住院医师16天增加到20天,而平均病假天数从每位住院医师1.7天减少到1.3天。有82%的住院医师表示强烈支持并希望继续保留新系统。通过使用JE轮转,我们的项目改善了服务覆盖问题和住院医师满意度,长期目标是提高住院医师的幸福感并丰富住院医师的学习体验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ad/10371805/8ff98baa9ad7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ad/10371805/f8facb625b8a/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ad/10371805/13b0867d2dbc/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ad/10371805/8ff98baa9ad7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ad/10371805/f8facb625b8a/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ad/10371805/13b0867d2dbc/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ad/10371805/8ff98baa9ad7/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
This is Jeopardy! A flexible coverage-based schedule model to address wellness for pathology training programs.这就是《危险边缘》!一种基于覆盖范围的灵活排班模型,用于解决病理学培训项目中的健康问题。
Acad Pathol. 2023 Jul 14;10(3):100087. doi: 10.1016/j.acpath.2023.100087. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
2
Evaluation of a pediatric intensive care residency curriculum.儿科重症监护住院医师培训课程评估
Crit Care Med. 1997 Nov;25(11):1898-903. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199711000-00031.
3
A real-time computer model to assess resident work-hours scenarios.一种用于评估住院医师工作时长情况的实时计算机模型。
Acad Med. 2002 Jul;77(7):752. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200207000-00043.
4
Early Results from the Flexibility in Surgical Training Research Consortium: Resident and Program Director Attitudes Toward Flexible Rotations in Senior Residency.外科培训研究联盟灵活性的早期结果:住院医师和项目主任对高级住院医师阶段灵活轮转的态度
J Surg Educ. 2015 Nov-Dec;72(6):e151-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
5
Defragmenting the Day: The Effect of Full-Day Continuity Clinics on Continuity of Care and Perceptions of Clinic.打散工作日:全日连续性临床诊疗对连续护理和临床感知的影响。
Teach Learn Med. 2021 Oct-Dec;33(5):546-553. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2021.1879652. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
6
Resident duty hour modification affects perceptions in medical education, general wellness, and ability to provide patient care.住院医师值班时长的调整会影响医学教育、总体健康状况以及提供患者护理的能力方面的认知。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 13;16:175. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0703-4.
7
An Evaluation of Off-Service Rotations in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery Residency Training.足病医学与外科住院医师培训中的非本专业轮转评估
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 May;58(3):480-483. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.09.026. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
8
Bereavement scheduling policy for emergency medicine residents: A descriptive pilot study.急诊医学住院医师的丧亲假安排政策:一项描述性试点研究。
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Jul 10;8(4):e11009. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11009. eCollection 2024 Aug.
9
Effect of the night float system on operative case volume for senior surgical residents.夜班轮替制对高年资住院医师手术量的影响。
J Surg Educ. 2009 Nov-Dec;66(6):314-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2009.07.009.
10
Analysis of Milestone-based End-of-rotation Evaluations for Ten Residents Completing a Three-year Anesthesiology Residency.对完成三年麻醉学住院医师培训的十名住院医师基于里程碑的轮转结束评估分析
Cureus. 2018 Aug 24;10(8):e3200. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3200.

引用本文的文献

1
A multi-institutional multi-methods analysis of jeopardy systems in academic hospital medicine.一项针对学术性医院内科危急值系统的多机构多方法分析。
J Hosp Med. 2025 Sep;20(9):953-962. doi: 10.1002/jhm.70045. Epub 2025 Apr 14.

本文引用的文献

1
A National Mixed-Methods Evaluation of General Surgery Residency Program Responsiveness and the Association with Resident Wellness.国家混合方法评估普通外科住院医师培训计划的反应能力及其与住院医师健康的关联。
J Surg Educ. 2022 Nov-Dec;79(6):e1-e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.05.004. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
2
Resident Physician Wellness Postpandemic: How Does Healing Occur?疫情后住院医师的健康状况:康复是如何发生的?
JAMA. 2022 Jun 7;327(21):2077-2078. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.7424.
3
A Strategy for Wellness in a Pathology Residency Program: Enhancing Chances of Success During an Epidemic of Burnout.
病理学住院医师培训项目中的健康策略:在职业倦怠流行期间提高成功几率。
Acad Pathol. 2019 Jun 10;6:2374289519851233. doi: 10.1177/2374289519851233. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
4
Design and Implementation of a Pathology-Specific Handoff Tool for Residents.住院医师专用病理交接工具的设计与实现
Acad Pathol. 2019 Apr 7;6:2374289519839186. doi: 10.1177/2374289519839186. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
5
Burnout in pathology: suggestions for individual and systemwide solutions.病理学中的职业倦怠:针对个人和系统层面解决方案的建议
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2018 May-Jun;7(3):166-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
6
Sleep and Alertness in a Duty-Hour Flexibility Trial in Internal Medicine.内科轮班灵活性试验中的睡眠与警觉性。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 7;380(10):915-923. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1810641.
7
Association of Clinical Specialty With Symptoms of Burnout and Career Choice Regret Among US Resident Physicians.临床专业与美国住院医师倦怠症状和职业选择遗憾的关联。
JAMA. 2018 Sep 18;320(11):1114-1130. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12615.
8
Education Outcomes in a Duty-Hour Flexibility Trial in Internal Medicine.内科值班时长灵活性试验中的教育成果
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 19;378(16):1494-1508. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800965. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
9
Well-Being in Residency: A Systematic Review.住院医师阶段的幸福感:一项系统评价
J Grad Med Educ. 2016 Dec;8(5):674-684. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00764.1.
10
Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US.医疗差错——美国第三大死因。
BMJ. 2016 May 3;353:i2139. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2139.