Bennett William C, Collins Katherine A, Johnson Johanna L, Slentz Cris A, Willis Leslie H, Bales Connie W, Huffman Kim M, Kraus William E
Department of Medicine, Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Divison of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Durham VA Medical Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Front Physiol. 2023 Jul 14;14:1199763. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1199763. eCollection 2023.
The purpose of this secondary analysis was to determine what portion of the effects of a Diabetes Prevention Program-like intervention on metabolic syndrome (MetS) could be achieved with exercise alone, as well as to determine the relative importance of exercise intensity and amount to the total exercise effect on MetS. Sedentary, overweight adults with prediabetes were randomly assigned to one of four 6-month interventions: 1) low-amount/moderate-intensity (10 kcal/kg/week at 50% peak ); 2) high-amount/moderate-intensity (16 kcal/kg/week at 50% peak ); 3) high-amount/vigorous-intensity (16 kcal/kg/week at 75% peak ); or 4) diet (7% weight loss) plus low-amount/moderate-intensity (10 kcal/kg/week at 50% peak ). The primary outcome of this secondary analysis was change in the MetS z-score. A total of 130 participants had complete data for all five Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III MetS criteria. The diet-and-exercise group statistically outperformed the MetS z-score and the ATP III score compared to the exercise alone group. Aerobic exercise alone achieved 24%-50% of the total effect of the combined diet-and-exercise intervention on the MetS score. Low-amount moderate-intensity exercise quantitatively performed equal to or better than the interventions of high-amount moderate-intensity or high-amount vigorous-intensity exercise in improving the MetS score. The combined diet-and-exercise intervention remains more efficacious in improving the MetS z-score. However, all three exercise interventions alone showed improvements in the MetS z-score, suggesting that a modest amount of moderate-intensity exercise is all that is required to achieve approximately half the effect of a diet-and-exercise intervention on the MetS. clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT00962962.
这项二次分析的目的是确定类似糖尿病预防计划的干预措施对代谢综合征(MetS)的影响中,仅通过运动能够实现的比例,同时确定运动强度和运动量对MetS总运动效果的相对重要性。久坐不动、超重的糖尿病前期成年人被随机分配到四种为期6个月的干预措施之一:1)低运动量/中等强度(每周10千卡/千克,强度为峰值的50%);2)高运动量/中等强度(每周16千卡/千克,强度为峰值的50%);3)高运动量/高强度(每周16千卡/千克,强度为峰值的75%);或4)饮食(减重7%)加低运动量/中等强度(每周10千卡/千克,强度为峰值的50%)。这项二次分析的主要结果是MetS z评分的变化。共有130名参与者具备所有五项成人治疗小组(ATP)III代谢综合征标准的完整数据。与单纯运动组相比,饮食加运动组在MetS z评分和ATP III评分方面在统计学上表现更优。单纯有氧运动实现了饮食加运动联合干预对MetS评分总效果的24% - 50%。在改善MetS评分方面,低运动量中等强度运动在数量上表现得与高运动量中等强度或高运动量高强度运动的干预效果相当或更好。饮食加运动联合干预在改善MetS z评分方面仍然更有效。然而,所有三种单独的运动干预都显示出MetS z评分有所改善,这表明进行适量的中等强度运动就能实现饮食加运动干预对MetS效果的大约一半。clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00962962。