Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情期间口罩内表面与全唾液的口腔微生物群

Oral microbiome of the inner surface of face masks and whole saliva during the COVID-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Lee Yeon-Hee, Kim Hyeongrok, Heo Dae Wook, Ahn In-Suk, Park Hee-Kyung

机构信息

Department of Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine, Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Life Sciences Lab, Denomics, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Front Oral Health. 2023 Jul 14;4:1178020. doi: 10.3389/froh.2023.1178020. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Wearing a face mask was strongly recommended during the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diversity of the oral microbiome, the abundance of each bacterium on the inner surface of the mask, and the effects of xerostomia on the microbiota. The study was conducted on 55 generally healthy adults (45 women and 10 men, mean age 38.18 ± 12.49 years). Unstimulated flow rate (UFR) and stimulated flow rate (SFR) were measured in whole saliva samples collected for each condition. The 14 major oral bacterial species, including , , , and on the inner surface of the mask and in the UFR and SFR samples, were analyzed by real-time PCR. We found that the total DNA copy number of oral bacteria was significantly higher in UFR and SFR than in the mask (< 0.001). On the inner surface of the mask, and were the most abundant Gram-negative and Gram-positive species, respectively The oral microbiome profile of the mask differed from that of the UFR and SFR samples. Shannon's diversity index was also significantly higher in the UFR and SFR than in the mask (2.64 ± 0.78, 2.66 ± 0.76, and 1.26 ± 1.51, respectively, < 0.001). Shannon's diversity index of UFR and SFR had a significant positive correlation with each other ( = 0.828,  < 0.001), but there was no significant relationship with Shannon's diversity index of mask. Red complex abundance, including and , was significantly higher in UFR than in the mask. Interestingly, the DNA copy number of each of the 14 bacteria, the total bacterial amount, and Shannon's diversity index did not differ in the absence or presence of xerostomia ( > 0.05). In summary, oral bacteria migrated to and existed on the inside of the mask, and the presence of xerostomia did not affect the bacterial profiles. The inner surface of the mask had an independent oral microbiome profile, although this showed lower quantity and diversity than the UFR and SFR samples.

摘要

在新冠疫情期间,强烈建议佩戴口罩。本研究的目的是调查口腔微生物群的多样性、口罩内表面每种细菌的丰度,以及口干对微生物群的影响。该研究针对55名一般健康的成年人开展(45名女性和10名男性,平均年龄38.18±12.49岁)。对每种情况下采集的全唾液样本测量非刺激性流速(UFR)和刺激性流速(SFR)。通过实时聚合酶链反应分析口罩内表面以及UFR和SFR样本中的14种主要口腔细菌种类,包括[具体细菌种类未给出]。我们发现,UFR和SFR中口腔细菌的总DNA拷贝数显著高于口罩中的(<0.001)。在口罩内表面,[具体细菌名称未给出]和[具体细菌名称未给出]分别是最丰富的革兰氏阴性菌和革兰氏阳性菌。口罩的口腔微生物群谱与UFR和SFR样本不同。UFR和SFR中的香农多样性指数也显著高于口罩中的(分别为2.64±0.78、2.66±0.76和1.26±1.51,<0.001)。UFR和SFR的香农多样性指数彼此具有显著正相关(=0.828,<0.001),但与口罩的香农多样性指数无显著关系。包括[具体细菌名称未给出]和[具体细菌名称未给出]在内的红色复合体丰度在UFR中显著高于口罩中。有趣的是,在有或无口干的情况下,14种细菌中每种细菌的DNA拷贝数、细菌总量和香农多样性指数均无差异(>0.05)。总之,口腔细菌迁移至口罩内部并存在于其中,口干的存在并未影响细菌谱。口罩内表面有独立的口腔微生物群谱,尽管其数量和多样性低于UFR和SFR样本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ffe/10379621/982f5ed405fa/froh-04-1178020-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验