• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公园体力活动问卷(Park-PAQ):一种基于公园和总体力活动的可靠测量工具。

The park physical activity questionnaire (Park-PAQ): A reliable measurement tool for park-based and total physical activity.

机构信息

The Australian Urban Design Research Centre, School of Design, The University of Western Australia. Australia. Level 2, 1002 Hay Street, Perth, WA 6000, Australia.

出版信息

Health Place. 2023 Sep;83:103085. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103085. Epub 2023 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103085
PMID:37523876
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies have explicitly quantified the proportion of park-based physical activity to park users' overall physical activity levels. Population studies need new context-specific physical activity measurement tools to achieve this. The objective of this study was to develop a reliable measure of self-reported park use and physical activity undertaken within and outside of parks to determine the contribution that park-based physical activity makes to overall physical activity levels.

METHODS

A test-retest reliability study (n = 104) was conducted using the Park Physical Activity Questionnaire (Park-PAQ), an instrument based on the Active Australia Survey. Park-PAQ items captured the frequency and duration of walking for recreation or exercise, walking for transport, moderate and vigorous physical activity and strength, conditioning and balance activities done in parks and elsewhere.

RESULTS

Recall of doing any walking for recreation (kappa = 0.649, p < 0.001) and any vigorous physical activity (kappa = 0.772, p < 0.001) was 'substantial', recall of doing any moderate physical activity (kappa = 0.553, p < 0.001) was 'moderate/acceptable', and recall of any walking for transport (kappa = 0.840, p < 0.001) 'near perfect'. Recall of the time spent walking for recreation in parks (ICC = 0.928, p < 0.001) was 'near perfect', whilst recall of time spent doing moderate activity in parks (ICC = 0.925, p < 0.001) and vigorous activity in parks (ICC = 0.962, p < 0.001) was 'near perfect'. Time spent walking for transport in a park (ICC = 0.200, p = 0.056) showed 'poor' agreement. Repeatability of the usual level of park use was 'substantial' (kappa = 0.744).

CONCLUSIONS

The Park-PAQ reliably measures six domains of physical activity and quantifies the proportion of physical activity done in parks as a proportion of total physical activity. The Park-PAQ, used alone or embedded into park or physical activity surveys, will reliably capture context-specific activities that will optimise population level physical activity interventions, park programming and park management and design.

摘要

背景

很少有研究明确量化了在公园内进行的身体活动在公园使用者整体身体活动水平中所占的比例。人群研究需要新的特定于上下文的身体活动测量工具来实现这一目标。本研究的目的是开发一种可靠的自我报告的公园使用和在公园内外进行的身体活动测量方法,以确定公园内身体活动对整体身体活动水平的贡献。

方法

采用基于澳大利亚积极调查的活动公园问卷(Park-PAQ)进行了一项测试-重测信度研究(n=104)。Park-PAQ 项目记录了为娱乐或锻炼而进行的散步频率和持续时间、步行进行交通、中等强度和剧烈强度的身体活动以及在公园内外进行的力量、调节和平衡活动。

结果

回忆进行任何娱乐性散步(kappa=0.649,p<0.001)和任何剧烈身体活动(kappa=0.772,p<0.001)的比例为“显著”,回忆进行任何中等强度身体活动(kappa=0.553,p<0.001)的比例为“中等/可接受”,回忆进行任何步行进行交通(kappa=0.840,p<0.001)的比例为“近乎完美”。回忆在公园内散步的时间(ICC=0.928,p<0.001)近乎完美,而回忆在公园内进行中等强度活动的时间(ICC=0.925,p<0.001)和剧烈活动的时间(ICC=0.962,p<0.001)近乎完美。在公园内步行进行交通的时间(ICC=0.200,p=0.056)的一致性“较差”。公园使用频率的重复性“显著”(kappa=0.744)。

结论

Park-PAQ 可靠地测量了六个身体活动领域,并量化了在公园内进行的身体活动占总身体活动的比例。Park-PAQ 单独使用或嵌入到公园或身体活动调查中,将可靠地捕捉到特定于上下文的活动,从而优化人群水平的身体活动干预、公园规划和公园管理和设计。

相似文献

1
The park physical activity questionnaire (Park-PAQ): A reliable measurement tool for park-based and total physical activity.公园体力活动问卷(Park-PAQ):一种基于公园和总体力活动的可靠测量工具。
Health Place. 2023 Sep;83:103085. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103085. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
2
A reliability assessment of a direct-observation park evaluation tool: the parks, activity and recreation among kids (PARK) tool.一种直接观察式公园评估工具的可靠性评估:儿童公园、活动与娱乐(PARK)工具
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 17;15:906. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2209-0.
3
Positive HABITATS for physical activity: Examining use of parks and its contribution to physical activity levels in mid-to older-aged adults.促进身体活动的积极环境:考察公园的使用情况及其对中老年人群身体活动水平的贡献。
Health Place. 2020 May;63:102308. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102308. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
4
Development of a reliable measure of walking within and outside the local neighborhood: RESIDE's Neighborhood Physical Activity Questionnaire.开发一种可靠的衡量当地社区内外步行情况的方法:RESIDE邻里体育活动问卷。
Prev Med. 2006 Jun;42(6):455-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.01.019. Epub 2006 Mar 30.
5
Are park availability and satisfaction with neighbourhood parks associated with physical activity and time spent outdoors?公园的可及性以及对社区公园的满意度与身体活动和户外停留时间有关联吗?
BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 6;21(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10339-1.
6
Effects of park-based interventions on health-related outcomes: A systematic review.基于公园的干预措施对健康相关结果的影响:系统评价。
Prev Med. 2021 Jun;147:106528. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106528. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
7
Park proximity, quality and recreational physical activity among mid-older aged adults: moderating effects of individual factors and area of residence.中老年人的公园可达性、质量与休闲体育活动:个体因素和居住区域的调节作用
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Apr 2;12:46. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0205-5.
8
Associations of park access, park use and physical activity in parks with wellbeing in an Asian urban environment: a cross-sectional study.亚洲城市环境中公园可达性、公园使用和公园内体力活动与幸福感的关系:一项横断面研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jul 2;18(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01147-2.
9
Parks Visitation, Physical Activity Engagement, and Older People's Motivation for Visiting Local Parks.公园使用、身体活动参与度与老年人游览本地公园的动机。
J Aging Phys Act. 2023 Oct 26;32(2):141-150. doi: 10.1123/japa.2022-0416. Print 2024 Apr 1.
10
How active are people in metropolitan parks? An observational study of park visitation in Australia.人们在城市公园中的活动情况如何?澳大利亚公园游客量的一项观察性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 4;15:610. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1960-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Is leisure sedentary time associated with mental health issues? Evidence from China Health and Nutrition Survey.休闲久坐时间与心理健康问题有关吗?来自中国健康与营养调查的证据。
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 6;13:1517830. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1517830. eCollection 2025.
2
Small Urban Green Spaces: Insights into Perception, Preference, and Psychological Well-being in a Densely Populated Areas of Tehran, Iran.小型城市绿地:伊朗德黑兰人口密集地区的认知、偏好与心理健康洞察
Environ Health Insights. 2024 May 15;18:11786302241248314. doi: 10.1177/11786302241248314. eCollection 2024.