Thomas D, Tipping T, Halifax R, Blogg C E, Hollands M A
Anaesthesia. 1986 Jul;41(7):692-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1986.tb12833.x.
A randomised, double blind study, of 58 female patients undergoing laparoscopic investigation was carried out to compare triazolam 0.25 mg, lorazepam 2 mg, or placebo as oral premedication. Each patient was assessed by only one of the authors both pre- and postoperatively with regard to anxiolysis, sedation and rapidity of recovery. Triazolam and lorazepam were each associated with a significant reduction in anxiety compared to the initial assessment, whereas placebo had no anxiolytic effect. Sixty minutes after premedication, patients who had received triazolam were significantly more sleepy than patients given placebo or lorazepam. Two hours after the operation, the patients who had had triazolam or lorazepam were significantly more sleepy than those who received placebo. However, at 6 hours postoperatively there was no difference between triazolam and placebo, whilst those who had been given lorazepam were still significantly more sleepy than those given placebo. Triazolam appears to offer advantages over either lorazepam or placebo in patients who require rapid recovery, sedation and reduction in pre-operative anxiety.
一项针对58名接受腹腔镜检查的女性患者的随机双盲研究,比较了0.25毫克三唑仑、2毫克劳拉西泮或安慰剂作为口服术前用药的效果。术前和术后仅由一位作者对每位患者的抗焦虑、镇静和恢复速度进行评估。与初始评估相比,三唑仑和劳拉西泮均与焦虑显著减轻相关,而安慰剂无抗焦虑作用。术前用药60分钟后,接受三唑仑的患者比接受安慰剂或劳拉西泮的患者明显更困倦。术后两小时,服用三唑仑或劳拉西泮的患者比接受安慰剂的患者明显更困倦。然而,术后6小时,三唑仑和安慰剂之间没有差异,而服用劳拉西泮的患者仍比服用安慰剂的患者明显更困倦。对于需要快速恢复、镇静和减轻术前焦虑的患者,三唑仑似乎比劳拉西泮或安慰剂更具优势。