Pinnock C A, Fell D, Hunt P C, Miller R, Smith G
Anaesthesia. 1985 Apr;40(4):324-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1985.tb10784.x.
Triazolam 0.25 mg, diazepam 10 mg and placebo were compared in a randomized double-blind trial of oral premedication in 90 patients undergoing minor gynaecological surgery. Both triazolam and diazepam produced a significant sedative effect as measured by patient self assessment linear analogue scales but only diazepam was more anxiolytic than placebo. Psychomotor performance assessed by the letter-search test at 3 and 6 hours after awakening showed a decrement in performance in patients receiving triazolam at 3 hours compared with the two other groups. Triazolam was shown to have a pronounced amnesic effect and whilst it might be used for premedication, its lack of anxiolysis coupled with a significant impairment of psychomotor performance at 3 hours after awakening, render the drug unsuitable for premedication in the short stay patient.
在一项针对90例接受小型妇科手术患者的口服术前用药随机双盲试验中,对三唑仑0.25毫克、地西泮10毫克和安慰剂进行了比较。通过患者自我评估线性模拟量表测量,三唑仑和地西泮均产生了显著的镇静效果,但只有地西泮比安慰剂更能缓解焦虑。觉醒后3小时和6小时通过字母搜索测试评估的精神运动表现显示,与其他两组相比,服用三唑仑的患者在3小时时表现下降。三唑仑被证明具有明显的遗忘作用,虽然它可用于术前用药,但其缺乏抗焦虑作用,且在觉醒后3小时会显著损害精神运动表现,这使得该药物不适合用于短期住院患者的术前用药。